Recent content by DrPoolittle

Not necessarily true. It depends on what the contract says. Normally, a part exchange deal does circumvent pay on clauses, which is why some clubs opt for it. To avoid making more payments

The problem with that is that Putin regards Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania as Russian territory. And Putin has a selective interpretation of history. Ands that being polite

For a safe, secure democracy, yes

That’s definitely true. Putin was even evasive about the scale and nature of celebrations regarding the 100th anniversary of the 1917 communist pigdog revolution.

One of the factors or trends of recent years is that the club signs players not on anyones radar.

I tend to agree that it won’t happen. but it’s a warning enough for those who are already mentally spending £12 million which the club hasn’t received and might not ever get

Tired and fatigue is caused by mental pressure as well

Didn’t they get signed by Lord Kitchener?

Unless Sporting accept the 2 player plus cash deal offered by Chelsea, apparently. Then Cov get about £2 million

One of the fun transfer rumours from Portugal is that Sporting are interested in 2 x player part exchange deal for Gyokeres, allegedly offered by Chelsea

There is still that persistent rumour that CCFC wanted two Posh players last January……

The problem with part exchanges is that other clubs don’t want our cast offs. Having said that, Godden might fancy a move back to Posh but somehow, I think they would prefer a cash deal

We know that Cov wanted another of Peterborough’s players, so I suspect we will follow up on that. but our squad is weak, why get rid of Bidwell, for example? The obvious lesson is that Robins needs a bigger squad. Let’s bring players in first. Oh and another thing ;) Allen and Bidwell wont...

would you pay £500k for a 30+ player? regardless, some of the chasing clubs don’t have £500k

For the last few games, Cov has the same stats as Rotherham at the foot of the table ;)