Fisher's Money (1 Viewer)

There is obviously a reason for him being here , he has to have a financial interest somewhere and I doubt he is silly enough to work somewhere that is pretty much damaging his reputation , for free

I think his life is in danger nothing adds up.there must be something on him.no pay no shares not a fan.lies lies lies.

there is more fisher threads on here than the princess leah forum

I think Fisher must be doing his own NOPM - not one payslip more

Suffolk sky blues said:

I think his life is in danger nothing adds up.there must be something on him.no pay no shares not a fan.lies lies lies.

Click to expand...

FFS.

He is paid on performance so gets nothing as his performance is shit.

1. Even if he was on 2-300k per year he could go and earn more elsewhere despite his performance at the club. Sure he's got plenty of mates that'll get him through the right doors.
2. He no doubt earns a decent wedge from his roles at the other organisations he's involved with.
3. He could probably retire now, be mortgage free and still live very comfortably for the rest of his life without ever earning another penny.

Given the three points above you've got to ask why is he still here? It's not worth taking all the (justifiable) shit he takes. If I was in his position I'd rather sit at home or on a beach than earn the relatively small amount (if anything at all) and be called a wanker by several thousand people in unison once or twice a week.

He must either enjoy the stick and the limelight or have another reason to hang around.

Henry Ford the car manufacturer once said "don't pay me a salary, just give me expenses". Is TF following this maxim?

Is all okay in the Fisher household though ?

I'm not sure what his spin is here but he's obviously not doing it for free, he's getting some sort of financial payment.

A free ST, pie and a pint. That should be about it for his input. Maybe someone should tell him the role of Chairman of a football club is to steer it towards success and not be ruled by a financial target. All well and good being prudent but surely EVERYONE should be focused on achieving success on the pitch.

Come on you accountancy boys let's have a detailed look at the dealings. After all Dave J. got him squirming on the phone-in.
And while were at it a 'skybluestalk' yes/no vote, should Fisher stay or go ?
If, you reckon stay, please be bold enough to give your reasons.

I sent a question in to the phone skiing exactly this
'I would like to ask Mr fisher if has he claims he receives no salary or expenses or money from the club why is he still doing the job as he is not even a supporter of the Sky Blues'

As per usual eakin selects what is chosen , he is a f**king lightweight interviewer He uses his own censorship a scruffy wanker

Sbarcher said:

A free ST, pie and a pint. That should be about it for his input. Maybe someone should tell him the role of Chairman of a football club is to steer it towards success and not be ruled by a financial target. All well and good being prudent but surely EVERYONE should be focused on achieving success on the pitch.

Click to expand...

Not at the price they charge at the Ricoh

SkyBlue_Bear83 said:

I'm not sure what his spin is here but he's obviously not doing it for free, he's getting some sort of financial payment.

Click to expand...

Or needs to get something back.

CJ_covblaze said:

Or needs to get something back.

Click to expand...

Exactly my thought. He may have been one of the original investors, and therefore has taken this position and hardline to recoup his cash.

Could explain his obvious detest for us, and determination to be as rigorous as possible.

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:

Exactly my thought. He may have been one of the original investors, and therefore has taken this position and hardline to recoup his cash.

Could explain his obvious detest for us, and determination to be as rigorous as possible.

Click to expand...

I doubt he has sufficient equity to be a serious investor.

Probably paid by another SISU company which then gets re-charged to CCFC as a management charge so he can still say he isn't paid by CCFC.

rupert_bear said:

Is all okay in the Fisher household though ?

Click to expand...

It must be, his house in Kent is worth 1.6M

no_loyalty said:

It must be, his house in Kent is worth 1.6M

Click to expand...

but he invested 70m in it and it took years to find the site

He gets paid. Make no mistake

no_loyalty said:

It must be, his house in Kent is worth 1.6M

Click to expand...

That property was sold last Nov for £1.5m. His latest Company listed a different address, although that doesn't mean he lives at that address, if he does it's a bit climb down the property ladder.