Fisher's thinking (1 Viewer)

Astute

Well-Known Member
What would it realistically cost to play somewhere else?
Thinking of timing here and the current whirlwind PR etc. (for next season).
I can't see them getting a cheaper deal overall anywhere than what it costs at the Ricoh.
If it were possible to reduce outgoings by say £200K, which I doubt, that may assist in maintaining a Cat 3 or 2 academy?
But we only have one more year of the deal that took us back. Wasps said they won't talk while the legal crap continues. And how do you know that the same deal will be on the table? I would guess that Wasps would want much more.

Our outgoings are going to reduce next season by a lot more than 300k. We will have a Division 4 budget. And not a top one either. But our income will also be much lower.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
So I repeat, what do they hope to gain after moving?

Last time, they took the hit because they hoped to gain something at the end of it. What, this time, would they hope to gain?
What deal have we got after next season? Do you think that the legal crap will be finished in time to sort one out? If there were talks would Wasps offer a good enough contract? Do Wasps even want us there?

Does Fisher have plans on directing us to JR3?

Take your pick.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Even fisher admitted we won't be moving.
Not happening.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Even fisher admitted we won't be moving.
Not happening.
So the Butts thing is all a lie?

Are you sure that Wasps will start talks?

Are you sure that the Butts will happen?

Do you believe what Fisher says?
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
what ||||||||||||
What don't you understand? I don't believe SISU would choose to move the club out of the city a 2nd time as any reason for them doing that would involve them significantly investing in something or alternatively chucking money away. That's something I don't think is ever going to happen given the sums required to do that, especially given the chances they've already spurned with the Ricoh would have cost much less. They only moved us the first time to try and get the Ricoh and that's off the table now. So if we do end up moving, it will be because Wasps are refusing to talk still/holding a division 4 club to rent ransom or that CRFC also refuse to do business with SISU. I didn't see his requests for mediation as anything other than a token gesture to show the FL they tried but everyone was against them.
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
What don't you understand? I don't believe SISU would choose to move the club out of the city a 2nd time as any reason for them doing that would involve them significantly investing in something or alternatively chucking money away. That's something I don't think is ever going to happen given the sums required to do that, especially given the chances they've already spurned with the Ricoh would have cost much less. They only moved us the first time to try and get the Ricoh and that's off the table now. So if we do end up moving, it will be because Wasps are refusing to talk still/holding a division 4 club to rent ransom or that CRFC also refuse to do business with SISU. I didn't see his requests for mediation as anything other than a token gesture to show the FL they tried but everyone was against them.


wasps are not for me don't do rugby at all but they would negotiate if court action is dropped thats not holding
ccfc to ransom its common sense pity our owners don't have any.if we are moved out again we will not have
been forced as there was a choice
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
So the Butts thing is all a lie?

Are you sure that Wasps will start talks?

Are you sure that the Butts will happen?

Do you believe what Fisher says?

Regarding believe whey fisher says we moved out when he said we would and no one believed him.

There are three scenarios;

1 we get a short term deal with wasps
2 we agree a move to the butts in a Withdean type arrangement with temp stands
3 we fold and why does that stop court action?
 

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
What deal have we got after next season? Do you think that the legal crap will be finished in time to sort one out? If there were talks would Wasps offer a good enough contract? Do Wasps even want us there?

Does Fisher have plans on directing us to JR3?

Take your pick.
So what do we gain by moving? Do we gain a deal? Do we gain co-operation from CCC? Why would you move the club, ahead of other options?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
I didn't see his requests for mediation as anything other than a token gesture to show the FL they tried but everyone was against them.
Which would take us out of Coventry again?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
So what do we gain by moving? Do we gain a deal? Do we gain co-operation from CCC? Why would you move the club, ahead of other options?
We don't have many options. And none are looking promising ATM.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
We don't have many options. And none are looking promising ATM.

Has Jack "council dart" Griffin hacked your account? He'd like this tinfoil conspiracy.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Can see the logic with the rail and road links, but there is no guarantee people would travel (even if it is 9 miles) to justify someone being daft enough to put money into building a new stadium by the NEC. Only plus would be its the "package" to be sold on...though i'll be the NEC would have something to say. Taking possible non-footy events away from the Arena???
There's already a possibility of a stadium at the NEC for Birmingham City as part of the Commonwealth Games bid. It would be heavily subsidised but the sticking point is Birmingham City putting their share in. If two clubs were to go in together would it be more viable?

Don't think the NEC would have an issue. They can't host concerts of that size and I would expect them to get the management contract for events there so it would actually add to their facilities and pretty much sink the Ricoh for concerts.
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
Which would take us out of Coventry again?
Yep, think the impending relegation has got them in a real panic and that they are trying to cover their arse with the FL in case Wasps really do hold out with the silent treatment and force them out. Wouldn't be the first time Fisher and SISU have horribly misjudged a situation.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
There's already a possibility of a stadium at the NEC for Birmingham City as part of the Commonwealth Games bid. It would be heavily subsidised but the sticking point is Birmingham City putting their share in. If two clubs were to go in together would it be more viable?

Don't think the NEC would have an issue. They can't host concerts of that size and I would expect them to get the management contract for events there so it would actually add to their facilities and pretty much sink the Ricoh for concerts.

I think they're actually talking about the Birmingham wheels site for the main stadium with BCFC not the NEC. Birmingham wheels having been previously eyed up by BCFC but it fell through because of financing. It's also a stones throw from their existing stadium. Railway station on the doorstep also.
 

1940oldfive

Active Member
Hada bit of a bad thought what he might have planned for us.

So the mediation is a list of things he wants and everyone else involved are supposed to join in with the mediation. I can't see it getting us anywhere even if it does happen. Our contract to play at the Ricoh has one more season to go. And Wasps are refusing to talk until the legal action stops.

We are about to become a Division 4 side. Gates will be well down. But so will the player budget. It sounds like our budget will be about 8th highest in Division 4. So in other words not very high. So financially SISU will be OK.

Now the bad part. Nothing happens with the Butts. Kicked out of the Ricoh. Fisher goes to the FL to move us out of Coventry. The FL would probably agree with the move. And our budget would be so low that Fisher would expect about 3k of us again to travel to 'home' games. But what Fisher doesn't understand is there would be many less turning up this time.

Fisher isn't thick. But he certainly doesn't know what makes a football supporter tick.
he may not be thick ,but he sure is stupid.
 

1940oldfive

Active Member
Nice to see a thread about our chairman without seeing 'Timmy' or 'fish face' mentioned. I dislike the guy as much as the next man but when you resort to infantile name calling your point is hugely diminished.

I think what will happen is out of his hands, every major decision will surely have to be run past Seppalla anyway.
I thought there was no connection between sisu and ccfc.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
It also ignores the fact that the existence of HS2 will push up land values in that area, why on earth would an investor want to pay to build a football stadium for a club that is getting gates of 7k in its own city?

Ground share with Brum. Bayern Munich and 1860 Munich ( rivals ) share the Allianz Arena on the outskirts of Munich - as an example. How far is the site from the centre of Birmingham?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Ground share with Brum. Bayern Munich and 1860 Munich ( rivals ) share the Allianz Arena on the outskirts of Munich - as an example. How far is the site from the centre of Birmingham?
They've always shared haven't they? Well certainly from the Olympic stadium onwards
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
The club won't move permanently, where in the UK is better placed for a football team than Coventry? Anywhere else you'd be up against established teams or far less population.

I can't see us getting The Butts ready for 2018/19, still think a short term Ricoh deal is most likely.
 

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
where in the UK is better placed for a football team than Coventry?
If we're talking permanently, then anywhere that offers a subsidised stadium.

If Rangers went pop again, there'd be one in Glasgow available... or there could be a half-decent push for Windsor Park to be ripe for a league club.

It'd take some radical re0thinking of football in this country but hey, if Rugby Union can franchise out, and if Rugby League can have a club in Toronto in its top flight...

Anyway, that's all the philosophical end ;) they'd only move if there was a benefit to do so in some way. If there was no benefit in terms of subsidising expansion, and no benefit in what they could get out of Coventry the city, they won't be off.

OK, they might not exist anymore... but they won't move(!)
 

Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue

Well-Known Member
Has Fisher ever done anything for this club than trot out embarrasing lies??? Only a fool would take a word he says seriously.

Fisher is as pathetic as the sap in the cap - Slade!
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
If we're talking permanently, then anywhere that offers a subsidised stadium.

If Rangers went pop again, there'd be one in Glasgow available... or there could be a half-decent push for Windsor Park to be ripe for a league club.

It'd take some radical re0thinking of football in this country but hey, if Rugby Union can franchise out, and if Rugby League can have a club in Toronto in its top flight...

Anyway, that's all the philosophical end ;) they'd only move if there was a benefit to do so in some way. If there was no benefit in terms of subsidising expansion, and no benefit in what they could get out of Coventry the city, they won't be off.

OK, they might not exist anymore... but they won't move(!)
They want to keep us going in the hope of getting some money back. Killing our club wouldn't give them much. It would solidify their losses. So they will do what they can to keep us going without cost to themselves.

So what happens if no deal is done at the Ricoh because Wasps continue not to talk because of ongoing legal matters and the Butts doesn't happen? I still can't see SISU spending millions building a ground that won't be theirs. The coffin dodgers next door will put up a fight. They have nothing better to do. The surrounding roads are already gridlocked on a Saturday. The local residents will put up a fight.

And I can see this being a reason for JR3. How many on here say they have the right to sort legal matters without prejudice? That certainly isn't happening ATM. And to me it is what Fisher is aiming towards with his mediation which is as usual him saying what he wants and expecting it to be done.
 

Godiva

Well-Known Member
They want to keep us going in the hope of getting some money back. Killing our club wouldn't give them much. It would solidify their losses. So they will do what they can to keep us going without cost to themselves.

Right, it took some time, but it seems most now have turned from 'they are only here short term' to 'they will liquidate us by the end of the season' to 'they are not going anywhere'.

So what happens if no deal is done at the Ricoh because Wasps continue not to talk because of ongoing legal matters and the Butts doesn't happen? I still can't see SISU spending millions building a ground that won't be theirs. The coffin dodgers next door will put up a fight. They have nothing better to do. The surrounding roads are already gridlocked on a Saturday. The local residents will put up a fight.

Is it a given that SISU are going to finance the BPA expansion (should it happen)? JS says he won't deal with SISU, and property investors are not hard to find. I can see CCRF finance the stadium expansion themselves and have CCFC as tenants on terms where CCFC pay rent and matchday costs but receive all matchday income as well as a share of non-matchday revenue. I think both parties will benefit from such a construction.

And I can see this being a reason for JR3. How many on here say they have the right to sort legal matters without prejudice? That certainly isn't happening ATM. And to me it is what Fisher is aiming towards with his mediation which is as usual him saying what he wants and expecting it to be done.

I can also see why the mediation is important to CCRF - they don't want to get caught out and being obstructed in the planning and building process, in fact they will need some good will from the council to help build infrastructure etc.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Right, it took some time, but it seems most now have turned from 'they are only here short term' to 'they will liquidate us by the end of the season' to 'they are not going anywhere'.



Is it a given that SISU are going to finance the BPA expansion (should it happen)? JS says he won't deal with SISU, and property investors are not hard to find. I can see CCRF finance the stadium expansion themselves and have CCFC as tenants on terms where CCFC pay rent and matchday costs but receive all matchday income as well as a share of non-matchday revenue. I think both parties will benefit from such a construction.



I can also see why the mediation is important to CCRF - they don't want to get caught out and being obstructed in the planning and building process, in fact they will need some good will from the council to help build infrastructure etc.
I have always said that they will stay around until they get money back in some way. And the JR'S are a part of this.

Sharp has said that they won't pay for it.

Wouldn't it be best to find out what Fisher has said he wants before cheering on the mediation that doesn't seem to include SISU in the talks? The threat of continuing with court cases if he doesn't get what he wants makes me think he might be after the other parties financing the build. And I can't see it happening.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
That's how we ended up in Northampton, everyone assumed he was talking shit and it would never actually happen.
Or when we were going to see the plans of our new stadium in 3 weeks. That was a few years ago now and we are still waiting.

You can't make out that he is telling the truth this time just because he did once a few years ago. But just the same you can't say that it is bullshit what he says unless you can decipher the actual words he says.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Yeah, doesn't really tell you anything about how CCFC could groundshare with Birmingham at the NEC though, does it?

Apart from the fact that the Allianz arena is away from the center of town and shared by two competing clubs. TF knows the directors of 1860 and likes the stadium. It can work with a major stadium sponsor.
 

Colin1883

Member
Hada bit of a bad thought what he might have planned for us.

So the mediation is a list of things he wants and everyone else involved are supposed to join in with the mediation. I can't see it getting us anywhere even if it does happen. Our contract to play at the Ricoh has one more season to go. And Wasps are refusing to talk until the legal action stops.

We are about to become a Division 4 side. Gates will be well down. But so will the player budget. It sounds like our budget will be about 8th highest in Division 4. So in other words not very high. So financially SISU will be OK.

Now the bad part. Nothing happens with the Butts. Kicked out of the Ricoh. Fisher goes to the FL to move us out of Coventry. The FL would probably agree with the move. And our budget would be so low that Fisher would expect about 3k of us again to travel to 'home' games. But what Fisher doesn't understand is there would be many less turning up this time.

Fisher isn't thick. But he certainly doesn't know what makes a football supporter tick.[/QUOT


Mr fishers thinking , from the efl to the fans ; the fk wits will believe anything i say (we don't lose anything until something happens )
 

Voice_of_Reason

Well-Known Member
My intuition tells me we will stay long term at the Ricoh. Forget the bull shit, the smokescreen, the willingness to mediate because in my opinion it's a ploy to remain at the Ricoh. It's the most sensible and affordable solution. Wasps will cave in because they need CCFC more than CCFC needs them. What do others think ?
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
That's how we ended up in Northampton, everyone assumed he was talking shit and it would never actually happen.

I think that may have been to focus people's minds as well.
When will SISU learn that withholding rent, taking the club away. Suing people, getting mauled in court then suing them again.
It really does focus people's minds, absolutely. Unfortunately you are just getting their backs up and focusing their minds completely against you. This is the the third time we are going down this type of route and the outcome unfortunately will be the same.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top