cov_george
Well-Known Member
Coventry City chairman Tim Fisher's income claims rubbished by football finance expert
CCFC chairman's income claims rubbished by footy finance expert
CCFC chairman's income claims rubbished by footy finance expert
Thanks for the steer. Took a little longer than I'd have liked. But we got there in the end.as the person who got that particular line of journalistic enquiry kick started I would say that is a good article and that I agree with the contents.
only thing that probably needed highlighting was the fact that the extra income streams bring with them extra costs and it is the net benefit or loss that affects what can actually be spent
all clubs have matchday costs
So it's not a question of throwing money around as in the top two divisions but sensible use of resources
Not the one I just made up in my headall clubs have matchday costs
all clubs have matchday costs
What else can you help us with oh great covcity4lifebut do all matchday costs have clubs?
ahhhhh you still have a lot to learn my young(old) apprentice.
What else can you help us with oh great covcity4life
You can squeeze a tube of toothpaste any which way you please, you can shake itask any question my child and i will usher you in the right direction
Would you rather have sex with a dog and nobody knows or not have sex with a dog and everybody thinks you have?ask any question my child and i will usher you in the right direction
Is that another question for CC4Life ?Can this one stay at least 3/4 on topic?
Would you rather have sex with a dog and nobody knows or not have sex with a dog and everybody thinks you have?
Only comparison I know of is Portsmouth. They had to pay out £400K one season in ground maintenance. But then you have to factor in that zero maintenance had been done for around 10 years and the ground is 120 years old. The Ricoh should be nowhere near that as it is newer and you would assume maintenance has been done since day one.That's what I mean, it would be interesting to compare.
They do but matchday costs is used as a cover all term so even if you knew other clubs matchday costs you wouldn't be comparing like with like. Just look at the last couple of seasons, matchday costs have increased rapidly as our crowds have decreased. Does that really stack up or are ACL using it as a way to keep the headline rent figure down whilst still taking a significant amount from the club?but do all matchday costs have clubs?
Coconut butter!!rather do it with dog because dont want people knowing and of course any hole is a goal.
now let us get back on topic before nick gets angry.
p.s do not use toothpaste, use just water and butter and lets see how your teeth look like in 3 months.
until next time my acolytes
Isn't this chap just confirming what Fisher has stated many times in the past? That in L1 / L2 our attendances allow us to be competitive but move to the championship and that isn't the case. We know thats true as the figures have been shown many times on here - we don't need to get the bar graph out again do we?
Of course if the revenues we don't get are so insignificant I'm sure ACL won't hesitate to pass them on to the club as if they are insignificant to CCFC then surely they are even more insignificant to ACL. Even if you agree with his valuation on stadium naming rights would £200K a year really be an insignificant amount?
Do people really want Fisher to come out with a massive list of what we do and don't get every time he talks about the Ricoh or do most people have a grasp on the basic facts?
Only comparison I know of is Portsmouth. They had to pay out £400K one season in ground maintenance. But then you have to factor in that zero maintenance had been done for around 10 years and the ground is 120 years old. The Ricoh should be nowhere near that as it is newer and you would assume maintenance has been done since day one.
They do but matchday costs is used as a cover all term so even if you knew other clubs matchday costs you wouldn't be comparing like with like. Just look at the last couple of seasons, matchday costs have increased rapidly as our crowds have decreased. Does that really stack up or are ACL using it as a way to keep the headline rent figure down whilst still taking a significant amount from the club?
We still had (and have) an advantage of the number of youth team graduates in the squad which don't count towards wage restraints in Leagues 1 and 2 ?