Rumour: Hoffman and Elliot takeover negotiations (3 Viewers)

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
I have no idea what their funds are.
Just wondered if you had any insider knowledge.
To be honest, they could all be billionaires, why should they bid over what the clubs worth and it must be currently worth very little.

But that has moved to having supporter aided funding
 

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
I have no idea what their funds are.
Just wondered if you had any insider knowledge.
To be honest, they could all be billionaires, why should they bid over what the clubs worth and it must be currently worth very little.

Yeah sorry mate I'm no insider. I think people do know things though but sometimes even people from inside the club get things wrong. For example Malaka and his takeover rumour and I heard from someone at the club that oggy had retired but seemingly that's not true either.
 

ccfchoi87

Well-Known Member
How much should they offer if the main financier has £100M in his account ?

I could understand a low first offer if they were going to come back with considerably better but I'm yet to see an offer even close to being acceptable. I'd like to see 10m offered up front and if rejected then 15m. After that I would bring in the promotion clauses etc
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Supporters contributing money is more to get fans buy in and involvement than shortage of funds.
So why not just buy the club first then worry about fan involvement rather than complicating things at this stage. You don't have to ask fans to contribute financially to allow involvement. Start with a fan rep on the board.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Was it not obvious when their first bid was less than a million?
That's about what we are worth if Sisu have Ryton. Why offer more than it's worth ?
Offering a realistic figure but give Sisu an incentive of sharing 'some' future incomes is the best way forward.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
So why not just buy the club first then worry about fan involvement rather than complicating things at this stage. You don't have to ask fans to contribute financially to allow involvement. Start with a fan rep on the board.
You can do both surely ?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
I could understand a low first offer if they were going to come back with considerably better but I'm yet to see an offer even close to being acceptable. I'd like to see 10m offered up front and if rejected then 15m. After that I would bring in the promotion clauses etc
That won't happen .
£15M is rediculous to pay out.
 

NortonSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
How much should they offer if the main financier has £100M in his account ?
Surely he had more than that? He was part of a company that was sold for 208 million so why isn't he making a mega offer for a club with little income, 12 months away from being homeless and Barretts building houses on the training pitch and div 4 status?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Supporters contributing money is more to get fans buy in and involvement than shortage of funds.

I have a feeling that could be right, but just a feeling.
I sense the trust and very keen to get fan involvement. Which, to be fair, is exactly the sort of thing the trust should be interested
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
So why not just buy the club first then worry about fan involvement rather than complicating things at this stage. You don't have to ask fans to contribute financially to allow involvement. Start with a fan rep on the board.

perhaps the trust have backed them into a corner a little bit on this one.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
That's about what we are worth if Sisu have Ryton. Why offer more than it's worth ?
Offering a realistic figure but give Sisu an incentive of sharing 'some' future incomes is the best way forward.
Totally disagree. SISU aren't going to be interested in a sale that relies on them getting there money at some point in the future if the club is successful. It also reduces the clubs ability to compete in the future. We are already in a difficult position due to the ground situation, it would be ridiculous to then hand over a chunk of future incomes.

As for Ryton why on earth would anyone want SISU as our landlords?
Or SISU are wasting everyone's time with ridiculous demands of what they want for the club. It's all a matter of prospective.
SISU are the seller which unfortunately puts them in the driving seat. No matter what price they put on it if nobody offers it they don't have to sell. I certainly can't see them selling just certain assets at a low pricewhile retaining the debt.
You can do both surely ?
Why introduce more complexity? Just get a deal done and sort the rest later. All they've done is give the impression they don't have the financial backing to get the deal done.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
SISU are the seller which unfortunately puts them in the driving seat. No matter what price they put on it if nobody offers it they don't have to sell. I certainly can't see them selling just certain assets at a low pricewhile retaining the debt.

Why does it put them in the driving seat? You're perceiving that they don't need or want to sell. That's not necessarily the case and they certainly aren't going to advertise it. That means that they're playing hard ball not that they're in the driving seat. If she has agreed to meet with them that's a softening of the ball.

Strange when it came to selling ACL your point of view was completely different yet we can make the same comparisons. CCC were claiming that they didn't need to sell, the truth however was completely different and they certainly weren't in the driving seat. Can't really see the difference myself.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Why introduce more complexity? Just get a deal done and sort the rest later. All they've done is give the impression they don't have the financial backing to get the deal done.
Or they are not stupid to pay more than it's worth ?
The question is to why they want to keep us going.? I know it's now costing them very little but what's their incentive ?
They can't ever get their money back unless they get to at least the Championship and they will need to invest to get there.
What's the point ?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Supporters contributing money is more to get fans buy in and involvement than shortage of funds.

Only what it is worth, good business people do not over pay.
SISU don't want this albatross round their necks for ever.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Surely he had more than that? He was part of a company that was sold for 208 million so why isn't he making a mega offer for a club with little income, 12 months away from being homeless and Barretts building houses on the training pitch and div 4 status?

His net worth is estimated at around £7 million if you google him
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
Surely he had more than that? He was part of a company that was sold for 208 million so why isn't he making a mega offer for a club with little income, 12 months away from being homeless and Barretts building houses on the training pitch and div 4 status?

Because he only had a small part of the £208m?
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Totally disagree. SISU aren't going to be interested in a sale that relies on them getting there money at some point in the future if the club is successful. It also reduces the clubs ability to compete in the future. We are already in a difficult position due to the ground situation, it would be ridiculous to then hand over a chunk of future incomes.

As for Ryton why on earth would anyone want SISU as our landlords?

SISU are the seller which unfortunately puts them in the driving seat. No matter what price they put on it if nobody offers it they don't have to sell. I certainly can't see them selling just certain assets at a low pricewhile retaining the debt.

Why introduce more complexity? Just get a deal done and sort the rest later. All they've done is give the impression they don't have the financial backing to get the deal done.
We don't want Sisu as our landlords, we would let them sell it and we would find somewhere else to train
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
The offers so far have been very generous for a club which is worth basically nothing.

There is no deal to be done at the moment it seems unless Sisu drop their ridiculous expectations and realise this is the best offer they will ever get.
 

NortonSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
Because he only had a small part of the £208m?
Yes I am aware of that. However much the consortium has to play with they will be paying over the odds as there is very little in the way of assets and precious little goodwill and probably the biggest asset is the fanbase and training ground and George Thomas.
 

mark82

Moderator
Or they are not stupid to pay more than it's worth ?
The question is to why they want to keep us going.? I know it's now costing them very little but what's their incentive ?
They can't ever get their money back unless they get to at least the Championship and they will need to invest to get there.
What's the point ?

I do agree with what you are saying but its going to take more than most think is reasonable to buy the club because they are not under pressure to sell. The club is no longer hemorrhaging money in the way it was, even making a small profit. If you have a seller who doesn't want or need to sell then it will take something over the odds, particularly when they have put a significant amount of money in.
 

thekidfromstrettoncamp

Well-Known Member
I think the main thing against SISU is goodwill even as we go forward if by chance they get promotion through 2 leagues people will never trust anything they say those of us not buying S T will not commit because there previous behaviour (big millstone) .As for the last offer I think it was generous and perhaps they may think on reflection there maybe some common ground to talk.(hope so)
 

Happy_Martian

Well-Known Member
I'm almost sure you would have been able to see the dollar signs in Joy's eyes when it was announced we had a "real" millionaire backing the bid. Forget logical ideas about walking away or stones around necks. She'll probably hold out for as much as she can drain from the consortium, especially as SISU aren't pouring money away in keeping the club solvent.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Well they obviously know what they can afford.
But why would you offer all you have let's face it we all want to get as much as we can for as little as possible.
After all you will still need money for running costs.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
If they have actually spoken, at least GH will have obtained a ball park figure from JS. I imagine that figure will be astronomical, and as we all know, the lady's not for turning....
Lady? Who did Joy get to go in her place then?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
The offers so far have been very generous for a club which is worth basically nothing.

There is no deal to be done at the moment it seems unless Sisu drop their ridiculous expectations and realise this is the best offer they will ever get.
Ryton approx 6m
Player values a few million.
The name CCFC which contains the golden share. Debatable

The true value of anything is the price someone is willing to pay. They are willing to pay more than nothing.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
One more thing. Something looks to have been leaked :woot: I await those going mental about another leak :shifty:
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
I still think the key is the ground,where we play or would like to next season and how much it will cost. No indication of any Wasp deal yet and sooner or later sisu will have to confirm to the EFL where. There might well be a deal with the stadium owner but they might demand significantly more and upfront and with the sisu past re rent who could blame them. This doubt surely effects value.
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
Get all of the ST money banked first and then start thinking about a selling price. Seems sensible to me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top