An interesting stat about a settled first 11 (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Note we just lost 2 of those most regular players, McCann & Sordell.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Kelly-Evans a bit surprising too.
Partly distorted by our keepers not having an absolute number one, too.
Esoterica
Well-Known Member
Yep, not arguing about the sentiment, just surprised at a couple of the names there.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Indeed.
Given Rose has been injured for much of the season, he's surprising too.
If I could be bothered, I'd check out the facts!
tisza
Well-Known Member
comes as no surprise.
Drives me batty.
Happened too much last couple of seasons particularly with strikers.
No wonder some of these strikers don't settle if they're constantly in and out of the side. What's wrong with having a 1st choice partnership and using sub appearances if necessary?
Got to wonder whether some of these loan contracts have guaranteed minutes/appearances in them.
Drives me batty.
Happened too much last couple of seasons particularly with strikers.
No wonder some of these strikers don't settle if they're constantly in and out of the side. What's wrong with having a 1st choice partnership and using sub appearances if necessary?
Got to wonder whether some of these loan contracts have guaranteed minutes/appearances in them.
Esoterica
Well-Known Member
Higher division clubs hoovering up young players then loaning them out and insisting they get game time so that they develop drives me crazy.
Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
Doesn't surprise me in the slightest. People can rightly blame sisu for a lot of bad, but you cannot ignore a set of stats like this which point directly at the management. Looking at this and the transfer window, it makes you wonder about TM and MV even more.
Last season JOB and Ruben were actually two of our better players earlier in the year. He tinkers with the team, (if anything keeps players in the team that were the ones actually underperforming) and things start going to shit. I mean, how are players supposed to keep any kind of form or morell?
Player selection cost us last year for sure, this season it has probably made a weak team even weaker.
Last season JOB and Ruben were actually two of our better players earlier in the year. He tinkers with the team, (if anything keeps players in the team that were the ones actually underperforming) and things start going to shit. I mean, how are players supposed to keep any kind of form or morell?
Player selection cost us last year for sure, this season it has probably made a weak team even weaker.
rupert_bear
Well-Known Member
And the worst culprits were the "experienced" ex Prem duo Mowbray and Venus, did they ever select the same team twice ?
st john
Well-Known Member
It looks like the most used eleven based on position, so, for example assuming Burge has played more games than Wright, he still wouldn't appear on the list. So the only players who could realistically knock Wright off the list are Thomas and Tudgay.
Chip Batch
Well-Known Member
So generally, the teams that win games at this level tend to pick the same team for the next game. Where-as the teams that lose more, tend to change things in search of Improvements.
Well I never...
Well I never...
Chip Batch
Well-Known Member
In all seriousness though, I'd have thought that's fairly standard. Although it cost us last year with Murphy and Armstrong suffering from fatigue (in my opinion).
