stupot07
SBT Legend
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Messages
- 35,655
- Reaction score
- 15,084
Surely new owners would've had nothing to do with poor running of Highfield Road?
Welcome to Sky Blues Talk!
You're currently viewing the forum as a guest. Join thousands of fellow Coventry City fans today!
Cllr Maton
- Thread starter stupot07
- Start date
Surely new owners would've had nothing to do with poor running of Highfield Road?
TurkeyTrot
Squad Player
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 764
- Reaction score
- 0
I thought it only went dodgy when a Labour politician bought the club...
CCFC_GT
Bench Warmer
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
- Messages
- 212
- Reaction score
- 0
[QUOTE Cllr. Kevin Maton tweetref. Stuart Linnell on-air comments:- History of running Highfield Rd. poor.Sharing income deal can be done. There's more to Ricoh than the pitch.]
[QUOTE Cllr.Kevin Maton tweet ref. Stuart Linnell on-air comments:- Why obsession with owning 100% of stadium. Running Ricoh complex & CCFC should be separate but partner.]
Rather than sound bite tweets from Cllr. Maton I would like to see a full explanation from him or CCC (official or otherwise) explaining to CCFC fans:-
1) Why a shared income partnership between CCFC and CCC would be better for the football club than a situation where the football club purchases and wholly owns all the revenue streams.
2) Why shared ownership of the Arena between CCFC and CCC would be better for the football club, rather than the stadium being wholly owned by the club.
Personally I think ownership of the revenues rather than ownership of the stadium is most important for the football club, though Haskell or any other new investors may have a different agenda.
I am genuinely interested to hear Cllr Maton / CCC put forward their case to the fans and convince us that shared ownership of revenues or stadium is in the clubs best interests.
Still waiting ...
[QUOTE Cllr.Kevin Maton tweet ref. Stuart Linnell on-air comments:- Why obsession with owning 100% of stadium. Running Ricoh complex & CCFC should be separate but partner.]
Rather than sound bite tweets from Cllr. Maton I would like to see a full explanation from him or CCC (official or otherwise) explaining to CCFC fans:-
1) Why a shared income partnership between CCFC and CCC would be better for the football club than a situation where the football club purchases and wholly owns all the revenue streams.
2) Why shared ownership of the Arena between CCFC and CCC would be better for the football club, rather than the stadium being wholly owned by the club.
Personally I think ownership of the revenues rather than ownership of the stadium is most important for the football club, though Haskell or any other new investors may have a different agenda.
I am genuinely interested to hear Cllr Maton / CCC put forward their case to the fans and convince us that shared ownership of revenues or stadium is in the clubs best interests.
Still waiting ...
Last edited:
Similar threads
