Nick
Administrator
Joy is apparently here today.
That isn't her is it?
Make Sure you have your tea before Bolton match (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter covboy1987
- Start date
That isn't her is it?
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
Sordell front cover for programmes today... :facepalm:
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
Some saying yes, some saying no, can't really see clear enough.
Nick
Administrator
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
The person who took the picture is saying it.
Nick
Administrator
The guy on Twitter?
skybluebeduff
Well-Known Member
Facebook, someone called glenn watkin.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Please tell me the CT haven't done an article on it
Nick
Administrator
Yeah, same bloke.
olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
I have no clue who's fault it is, but which bit of that says or implies it's the clubs fault?
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
More concerned that we seem to be depending on one of the Bee Gees' brothers for our f&b.
Nick
Administrator
Probably how the emphasis is on the ticket price and how the article reads.
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Aren't they all dead yet?
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
What do you think we've been serving for the past few weeks!
Otis
Well-Known Member
GLEN?????? Hmm....
Johnnythespider
Well-Known Member
Looks a bit short to be her to me
olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
I see a "no comment" from ACL that looks to me like they don't want to admit it's their fault. The pricing just emphasises that our highest paying supporters are being hard done to. Not sure where any if it says it's the clubs fault.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
They're not of a holy order that takes a vow of silence.
Nick
Administrator
Why would they not say anything because it's been Christmas?
Otis
Well-Known Member
Because maybe they are not there?
Just guessing, Nick. Complete guess.
Happy to wait until they DO issue a statement mind.
They HAVE to don't they? Don't mean legally, just from a sensible business approach and to clarify.
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
Not sure why ACL have to comment at all, and suspect they wont. There have been far more important issues and they have not commented on those in the past.
The contract is between ACL and Otium, they have no direct responsibility to the CCFC fans. So only comment is likely to be from CCFC
The contract is between ACL and Otium, they have no direct responsibility to the CCFC fans. So only comment is likely to be from CCFC
Hobo
Well-Known Member
Do Senior Management not have the longest holidays at your place? Plus it is always a good delaying tactic. Anyway you are assuming they know anything about it.
Could be that contract says there must be a certain number of people in the lounges before stuff like food is provided? Or even opening the lounges themselves, like in the checkatrade trophy there will only be 1500 people so only one stand is open.
And there simply haven't been the customers, so therefore the places aren't being opened.
Be pointless opening the corporate lounges for only a handful of supporters?
And there simply haven't been the customers, so therefore the places aren't being opened.
Be pointless opening the corporate lounges for only a handful of supporters?
Nick
Administrator
Strange how they comment when it can make CCFC look bad.
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
Can't remember ACL issuing many (any)statements at all about Ccfc in the last 6 months but you seem to be keeping count so would know better than me.
The Kingpower got Ranieri and BocelliLooks a bit short to be her to me
We get a Rene and Renatta tribute act. :-o
Skybluesince82
Well-Known Member
Let's hope the CT pursue this a little. They have looked in to it and had (in my opinion) a far from satisfactory response from The CE of ACL. 'Operating within the contract' and 'no comment'? Come on.... anyone really happy with that?
It may seem someone trivial and it has been mentioned before that it could simply be a business decision... if that's the case fair enough, but offer an explanation. I posted originally that i felt it is all to do with undermining the CCFC match day experience. More than happy to be proven wrong, but the response from Wasps/ ACL doesn't make me feel any different.
If there is a dispute or contractual issue between the landlords and the tennant, considering the fragile state of the club at the moment and the fact talks need to happen pretty soon about the longer-term of the rental agreement, isn't that in the public interest to explore a little more? That is what the CT are all about after all (as they keep telling us).
It may seem someone trivial and it has been mentioned before that it could simply be a business decision... if that's the case fair enough, but offer an explanation. I posted originally that i felt it is all to do with undermining the CCFC match day experience. More than happy to be proven wrong, but the response from Wasps/ ACL doesn't make me feel any different.
If there is a dispute or contractual issue between the landlords and the tennant, considering the fragile state of the club at the moment and the fact talks need to happen pretty soon about the longer-term of the rental agreement, isn't that in the public interest to explore a little more? That is what the CT are all about after all (as they keep telling us).
