OK he had a bad season with injury but for clubs like Spurs with money to spend he's surely worth the gamble. Plenty of players have been signed for 20m or more with far less potential and a far worse inury record
We all know we wouldn't see any of the money regardless, I'm not sure how much of the Maddison mo eye went back in to the playing squad but I'm sure it wasn't a lot, same goes for when we originally sold Wilson. Money coming in doesn't neccasarily mean money to spend
No we don't. Based on what? There is absolutely no basis to that statement. We seem to now be in a position where no money is being put into the club, and no money is being taken out. The club is trying to be self-sufficient, and so while all of the money might not be used for transfers in, there's no reason to suggest it won't be used to cover running costs, academy, wages etc. if the club falls below its break-even point.
Also, we have just reportedly paid up to £500k for Jones, and I'm willing to bet payments for Maddison will be staged anyway, so it's not as though we will have received all the money from Norwich yet anyway.
The Wilson money was used to cover costs, given that we went a whole season with gates of 2000, tiny revenues from merchandise and almost no sponsorship money. How do you think we paid the wages of the likes of Baker, Moussa, Clarke etc? That was entirely SISUs fault - but the idea that the Wilson money was siphoned off at a time the club was making huge losses is a nonsense.