Yep but he had the balls to tell the truth about sisu and said thats why he was leaving due to broken promises.
Says it all
MarkRobins said:I spoke to the owner, I sought assurances and didn’t get any assurances from the owner of Coventry. I absolutely wish them all the best, they work their socks off and as I’ve said before that club needs support from Coventry City Council... it needs support to build revenue streams and help from the council.
Can't we just move on and talk about CCFC's future on and off the pitch rather than Robins leaving and why he left etc. etc.
Nothing to do with his larger pay packet, closer to his home in a higher league then?Yep but he had the balls to tell the truth about sisu and said thats why he was leaving due to broken promises.
Says it all
Didn't Robins do both.
Firstly say it was because he was promised a budget that didn't come.
Then later say the council need to help the club more.
He just lived off DMC and the players he inherited.
His track record since showed he was nothing special.
Bloody hell, where did you dig that one up from, NW?Nah.
due to the proliferation of confidentiality clauses we will not know anything for many a year,
there is a common denominator tho,
and that is, imho,
the continued installation of poor quality at the top,
Clarke, Dulieu, Clouting, Igwe, Labowic, & present day persons etc.,
presumably they all had/have to report to JS who said/will say NO
Tis a bit strange though that he is the only manager who has made such comments isn't it.
I'm sure that Chris Coleman has said that promises from the club's owner were not honoured.
I know that, Nick and it was money poorly spent. That doesn't mean Coleman wasn't telling the truth.He did spend £1.2m on Eastwood...
He did spend £1.2m on Eastwood...
I'm sure that Chris Coleman has said that promises from the club's owner were not honoured.
Coleman spent more in his last season with us than he did the previous year. £1.5mill just on Clingan, McIndoe and Craine. We also made over £5mill that season on players sales like Dann, Best and Fox which recouped SISU's expenditure the season before on Eastwood, Dann and Fox.There were rumours after the first full season, that both Ranson and Coleman resigned as the budgets got slashed, but were persuaded to stay on after all.
All used up on Michael Doyles 100k a week.Coleman spent more in his last season with us than he did the previous year. £1.5mill just on Clingan, McIndoe and Craine. We also made over £5mill that season on players sales like Dann, Best and Fox which recouped SISU's expenditure the season before on Eastwood, Dann and Fox.
SISU have seen more money come in than they have put out. Just check the transfers in and transfers out since they arrived in 2007.
Coleman loaned him to Leeds...All used up on Michael Doyles 100k a week.
I can only think of only one manger to do well under Sisu.
Either Sisu are rubbish at finding managers or they don't back then properly, the stats don't lie I'm afraid.
Arguably the only one wheree the game changed halfway through... although I was always slightly nervous for Pressley that he'd been sold a 'vision' that never happened.
Robions always seemed to be calling it how he saw it, Pressley seemed to have an expectation of things that didn't end up happening although, again, that coyuld just have been his style of talking things up in public.
I never understood why Pressley said the freezing out of Carl Baker and the decision to let Richard Wood and Joe Murphy leave were footballing decisions, ie nothing to do with their salary. It was almost as though he was taking the flack away from Sisu and on to himself. I really can't believe that he let Baker and Murphy go for footballing reasons.
Didn't Dowie say the same?
The only thing I can think of is if he could get 3 or 4 players in for the same cost as Baker/Murphy then it kind of becomes a footballing decision. But it's scraping the barrel!I never understood why Pressley said the freezing out of Carl Baker and the decision to let Richard Wood and Joe Murphy leave were footballing decisions, ie nothing to do with their salary. It was almost as though he was taking the flack away from Sisu and on to himself. I really can't believe that he let Baker and Murphy go for footballing reasons.
It wouldn't surprise me at all. Something changed after that match and we were never the same again, certainly on the pitch.Ranson told me that he initially resigned after the Leeds game when we were 4th in the League under Bothroyd, as this was the night that SISU advised him that the investment was over. No idea if this is true or partially true - just what he told me
I never understood why Pressley said the freezing out of Carl Baker and the decision to let Richard Wood and Joe Murphy leave were footballing decisions, ie nothing to do with their salary. It was almost as though he was taking the flack away from Sisu and on to himself. I really can't believe that he let Baker and Murphy go for footballing reasons.
I could believe those two. Baker was erratic and dipped second half of the season - directly replaced by O'Brien. Jim Blyth always used to have a massive downer on Murphy and decide he just wasn't up to it. if Pressley and his advisors saw whatever Blyth did...