AFCCOVENTRY
Well-Known Member
It was inevitable that we wouldn't get John Terry but we have Alex Davey on trial.
Being friends with John Terry.What is he said to have done wrong?
Being friends with John Terry.
If Stokes has now got two sore thighs injuries as well then we might as well bin him off.we need stokes to sor thios injuries out or we are in trouble at left back
spent money on renewing haynes now aswel so probably not worth buying a new 1
The main word is "potentially'Both these triallists are predominently RIGHT sided. Both the players they are potentially replacing, Harries and Turnbull, are predominently LEFT sided. Presumably one of them will be signed as cover for Willis and, if necessary, at right back.
Although he is 2 years younger than Pearson, Davey is a more experienced and he is also a couple of inches taller at 6' 3". It'll be interesting to see which of them MR chooses. I imagine fitness will be a significant factor.
Both these triallists are predominently RIGHT sided. Both the players they are potentially replacing, Harries and Turnbull, are predominently LEFT sided. Presumably one of them will be signed as cover for Willis and, if necessary, at right back.
Although he is 2 years younger than Pearson, Davey is a more experienced and he is also a couple of inches taller at 6' 3". It'll be interesting to see which of them MR chooses. I imagine fitness will be a significant factor.
No, Otis. You're thinking of Thor Sios.I thought Sor Thios was an Icelandic international we were interested in.
Hyam is right sidedWe need another right-sided CB no matter what as Willis is the only option at the moment
I was thinking that!Despite all the excitement of a month ago all of a sudden the squad is starting to look very thin in certain areas.
Hyam is right sided
Maybe they will put a bit of weight on before the season starts.Despite all the excitement of a month ago all of a sudden the squad is starting to look very thin in certain areas.
nah, you're thinking of Game of Thrones.I thought Sor Thios was an Icelandic international we were interested in.
George of House Thomasnah, you're thinking of Game of Thrones.
Replace young players we have sold. Bring them on. Sell them. A lot quicker than doing it with young lads.I can't see why you would sign anybody to play in the under 23's they could win every game this season and we won't get one league point for it
Not saying this chap is just a general comment
Replace young players we have sold. Bring them on. Sell them. A lot quicker than doing it with young lads.
Younger players doing well make it into the 1st team. Not every player brought in is going to be a 1st choice. We can't afford the wages to have 2 x every position where they all are good enough to think they are good enough to be 1st on the team list.All concentration should be on promotion for the first team.
Younger players doing well make it into the 1st team. Not every player brought in is going to be a 1st choice. We can't afford the wages to have 2 x every position where they all are good enough to think they are good enough to be 1st on the team list.
Bringing in promising young players gives cover for injuries/suspensions and the chance to become 1st choice.
And what happens when injuries and suspensions kick in?Might be able to make a start but getting rid of two keepers then as we have four and as Burge seems to be the best the rest must be hopeless. I would rather have a smaller squad of better players than filling out with players you will never use.
And what happens when injuries and suspensions kick in?
And what happens when injuries and suspensions kick in?
RCC can play left back!
My word we already have four
Any fit to play/good enough?
So 7 spare players. 5 on the bench. 2 spare. 1 injury then you are already looking at youth players.A squad on 18 plus the young lads he signed from the youth would manage, but that would allow for four left backs and currently two right backs but trying more.
I was really positive about the squad building at the start but less so now