I still think there's good things to come from cody...
Rather see Cody than some player who will be only here for a few months.
Why are you even debating this?
Simple question: Picture this - we're 1 nil down (as usual) and there's 20 minutes to go. AT is FORCED to make a sub (He wouldn't do it on his own) would you honestly stand there and think "Cody will change this"
He's not a game changer and I fail to see what his 'niche' is.
Platt - Bring down man
Eastwood - skill attacking from wings and form 35ish yards out
Nimley - Just skill without the right supply
Mcsheffrey - skill attacking from the wings and 35ish yards out
Can anyone define a niche for Cody? Not "I think he would be good at..." - Has to be an actual 'niche' to define him. It is simply not acceptable to keep saying "He needs time" for every player who comes in and flops.
Why are you even debating this?
Simple question: Picture this - we're 1 nil down (as usual) and there's 20 minutes to go. AT is FORCED to make a sub (He wouldn't do it on his own) would you honestly stand there and think "Cody will change this"
He's not a game changer and I fail to see what his 'niche' is.
Platt - Bring down man
Eastwood - skill attacking from wings and form 35ish yards out
Nimley - Just skill without the right supply
Mcsheffrey - skill attacking from the wings and 35ish yards out
Can anyone define a niche for Cody? Not "I think he would be good at..." - Has to be an actual 'niche' to define him. It is simply not acceptable to keep saying "He needs time" for every player who comes in and flops.
Isn't he an off the shoulder kind of player? Needs balls threading through to him.
Why are you even debating this?
Simple question: Picture this - we're 1 nil down (as usual) and there's 20 minutes to go. AT is FORCED to make a sub (He wouldn't do it on his own) would you honestly stand there and think "Cody will change this"
He's not a game changer and I fail to see what his 'niche' is.
Platt - Bring down man
Eastwood - skill attacking from wings and form 35ish yards out
Nimley - Just skill without the right supply
Mcsheffrey - skill attacking from the wings and 35ish yards out
Can anyone define a niche for Cody? Not "I think he would be good at..."Something none of the above can do on a regular basis....be a goalscorer. if hes not good enough then move him on at some point in the future. Would have him coming off the bench for the last 25-30 mins on Saturday if they need a goal or to pose their defence some different questions
According to the Norwich fans who were gutted to lose him, His niche is an all round top player and striker. They say he can score and create with both feet. He is good with his head and will be a top player.
Of course he will have to start on the bench, having him on the bench and not been forced to introduce that ungrateful twat fattie eastwood is a big bonus for CCFC
Rather see Cody than some player who will be only here for a few months.
Isn't he an off the shoulder kind of player? Needs balls threading through to him.
Seems a bit over enthusiastic considering he's only scored 4 goals for Norwich, and was deemed by them not good enough for the championship last season.
The funniest aspect of this thread is the assertion that Freddie is capable of 'attacking from the wings'.
In his current state, he couldn't run from the touch line to the box without stopping off for a pasty.
Forget the YouTube clips from his Southend days, the man is now in the sort of shape you'd expect from an ex-pro turning up for a testimonial
Has pace and when in form will be the best natural finisher at the club......That a good enough "niche"?