We only had 6 managers in the 1980's.
2001-2010 15 managers
2010-2018 11 managers
Funny how our demise has gone hand in hand with a high turnover of managers.
Different expectations. Losing regularly in the PL was considered OK as long as we stayed up. After relegation we were expecting better, but were often also rans or in danger. Yes, that's also to do with financial troubles but if a manager is losing games and doesn't look like turning it around what option do you have other than change the manager.
Over the years we've seemed to be a club where many players think doing the bare minimum is sufficient - it's only Cov so they don't expect too much. So many years we could have pushed on after decent starts only to drop away as the players seemed to either get complacent or feel that was enough to reach the minimum standard required. Infuriating.
There are numerous instances of this club looking down and out and a change of manager has led to a sufficient upturn in results to stay up. We got relegated from the PL with our 4th longest serving manager in history.
Arsenal - Wenger won the PL 3 times in the first half of his tenure. None in the last half and has left them looking barely borderline good enough for Europa League. Surely with such stability they should've been walking it?
Alex Ferguson was one loss away from the sack and had to win a trophy to be given the opportunity to create the legacy he did (some of which was down to the good fortune of WHEN he did it - just as the PL/Sky revolution occured - and the fortune of a youth system set up before his tenure bore the fruit of the class of '92. If he hadn't carried on winning those trophies would he have had that long in the job - of course not.
It is a total fallacy that stability leads to success. Success leads to stability.