Here we go again come on another 10 pages bashing the trustAn unsurprising new development is that the trust appears to have done nothing since the meeting. No transcript, no presentation of ideas. Nothing.
I presented an idea to them. Was told it was being discussed. Nothing.Here we go again come on another 10 pages bashing the trust
An unsurprising new development is that the trust appears to have done nothing since the meeting. No transcript, no presentation of ideas. Nothing.
Maybe their input would introduce more flags and crosses.Is this why we've got a load of right wingers and no-one on the left?
Obviously not the part where I said the trust needs to not only do things but seen to be doing things, to be open.One part of what you suggested has already been implemented.
Well, it's more than the trust have done I suppose.Not quite sure how their involvement will help the situation!
View attachment 11479
Obviously not the part where I said the trust needs to not only do things but seen to be doing things, to be open.
Well, it's more than the trust have done I suppose.
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Is this a classic CT typo and it's meant to be the EFL??Not quite sure how their involvement will help the situation!
View attachment 11479
Is it ever possible?Can you appreciate that that’s not always possible?
I didn't realise this was a thing? When did it happen?Like raising enough money to save our academy?
It's a secret.I didn't realise this was a thing? When did it happen?
It hasn't but it means they've talked about itI didn't realise this was a thing? When did it happen?
I'll have a guessCan you appreciate that that’s not always possible?
I thought they had no money so unless someone has dipped their hands in their pocket as a personal contribution under the umbrella of the trust then it's not happening.
Which time roughly?The Trust raised 25 grand to save it a few years ago. That’s just one example of the positive contributions we’ve made throughout the years.
The only time I can recall a trust raising money for the academy was before the currently trust.Which time roughly?
Oh that makes a bit of sense. I assumed it was a reference to the current lot led by David Johnson.The only time I can recall a trust raising money for the academy was before the currently trust.
It was back when we had the old version with the likes of Natalie Cox and Kev Monks. The one that got killed off for being ineffective and replaced with the current one. Although in the end didn't the new trust have to end up being a continuation of the old one for it to be 'official' or something along those lines.
The academy stuff would have been before SISU were here, didn't the club think the academy wasn't worth keeping going?
David Johnson doesn’t lead the Trust.Oh that makes a bit of sense. I assumed it was a reference to the current lot led by David Johnson.
Would explain willis leaving...
We're really scraping the barrel if the SCG is being included as a positive :emoji_smiley: