mark_ccfc
Well-Known Member
What is not balanced about it?
As I said it's not the whole story.
What is not balanced about it?
Can you point towards an article that does present the whole story?As I said it's not the whole story.
As I said it's not the whole story.
A failure to find one doesn't mean this one does present it.Can you point towards an article that does present the whole story?
Agree.I wouldn't want them to go bust Otis, i would like them to go back from whence they came though, then we would see how many of their new fans would be prepared to travel 100 miles each way to watch them play, a situation they seem quite happy to have bestowed upon their Wycombe based support.
I didn’t say it did. People may just be refreshed as the fire is being pointed in one of the other directions for a change.A failure to find one doesn't mean this one does present it.
Agree.For a start the article doesn’t mention the judicial reviews...where the merits or otherwise of the case are tested in a court of law.
Otherwise I thought it a decent piece.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When they moved here part of the justification was the claim that rugby fans aren’t attached to clubs the way football fans are and any who couldn’t travel would just go and watch another team. Was that a convenient lie?Very poor thinking that if you ask me.
How is it the genuine Wasps fans fault and why do they deserve to lose their club?
How many honest, true and genuine Wasps fans have let it be known to their club they don’t agree with us bring kicked out?And what about the honest, true and genuine Wasps fans?
What has that got to do with genuine Wasps fans? Do they deserve to lose their club?When they moved here part of the justification was the claim that rugby fans aren’t attached to clubs the way football fans are and any who couldn’t travel would just go and watch another team. Was that a convenient lie?
Tbh Liddle says the problems are myriad and complexFor a start the article doesn’t mention the judicial reviews...where the merits or otherwise of the case are tested in a court of law.
Otherwise I thought it a decent piece.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But he said it doesn't tell the whole story. Where in that statement means he has to find one that does?I didn’t say it did. People may just be refreshed as the fire is being pointed in one of the other directions for a change.
What’s the point in criticising a price for not telling the whole story when nothing ever has?But he said it doesn't tell the whole story. Where in that statement means he has to find one that does?
How many Wasps fans are there on that forum?How many honest, true and genuine Wasps fans have let it be known to their club they don’t agree with us bring kicked out?
The overwhelming majority of comments I have seen have no issue with it, many are celebrating it.
This seems to me a bit harsh. Without the intervention of the hedge fund monkeys, Coventry City would not exist at all and SISU have put an awful lot of money into the club, without seeing very much in the way of a return.
Again one is tempted to ask why they have done this, but as they are all financial experts I suppose they must know what they are doing.
League One is rapidly becoming a sanctum of the lost and the dispossessed, given the travails of poor Bolton Wanderers.
There was a time, fairly recently, when Coventry City had the longest unbroken spell in the top tier of any club, Arsenal and Everton excepted — 34 years of pleasant over-achievement that included a memorable FA Cup final win over Tottenham Hotspur in 1987, participation in the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup and a two-legged tie against Bayern Munich, and a top-six finish. And that delightful goal off a free kick scored by Ernie Hunt after Willie Carr’s illegal flick-up, which we all tried to copy in the playground.
They will, UNLESS we have a change of ownership.Great article.
Problem we may have is, even If wasps go bust, then what. Surely the council will go looking elsewhere again ?
Great article.
Problem we may have is, even If wasps go bust, then what. Surely the council will go looking elsewhere again to fill the Ricoh ?
To who though, realistically?
They will, UNLESS we have a change of ownership.
Too many bridges have been burned now between the council and Sisu.
Council should still do their civic duty though in terms of us finding a new stadium site, if that was ever to happen.
We said the same last time. Who knows ?
Whooo hooooo!!!Probably a fucking NFL team knowing our council and modern day sport...
Would be quite funny - the Council wondering what to do with their big white elephantTbh Liddle says the problems are myriad and complex
My take on the article is that his underlying point is that the football team are being forced out and will have to build another stadium in Coventry
But the rugby club are in such dire straits that they may themselves go out of business leaving an empty Rocoh
Do you think if Wasps were to go pop the council wouldGreat article.
Problem we may have is, even If wasps go bust, then what. Surely the council will go looking elsewhere again to fill the Ricoh ?
Personally I think the council could get away with either if they wanted to.Do you think if Wasps were to go pop the council would
A. Dare to go down the road of bringing in another franchise with all that could entail.
B. Be allowed to bring in another franchise by the fans of the football club.
I think it would be political suicide as we would be ready for it this time.
Agreed GrendelNo it isn’t I could give a toss about them
You know very well what the whole story is, stop baiting me.What’s the whole story then?
Could say that for any of Simon Gilbert's or David Conn's articles then. Why do they get criticised on here, then?What’s the point in criticising a price for not telling the whole story when nothing ever has?
No I can't, I still don't think this is a balanced article though.Can you point towards an article that does present the whole story?
Perhaps because it’s the same spin each time whereas this is different spin for a change.Could say that for any of Simon Gilbert's or David Conn's articles then. Why do they get criticised on here, then?