Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (289 Viewers)

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
If these tests work it’s great work so quickly and needs to continue at that pace
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Question: wouldn’t you still be able to spread it even if you’re immune? So wouldn’t that bring it to everyone uninflected quicker if all the others started moving about more? Anyone know?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I read something though that suggested it's a bit like our immunity to the common cold / flu, we're never fully immune but should be sufficiently for a reasonable enough period to get over the peak

Yeah should’ve said twice in quick succession. Even a vaccine might have to be a yearly thing.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Question: wouldn’t you still be able to spread it even if you’re immune? So wouldn’t that bring it to everyone uninflected quicker if all the others started moving about more? Anyone know?

If you have immunity to a disease and you're exposed to the pathogen you will eliminate it extremely quickly.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Question: wouldn’t you still be able to spread it even if you’re immune? So wouldn’t that bring it to everyone uninflected quicker if all the others started moving about more? Anyone know?

If you're immune doesn't it just mean that your antibodies kill the virus, i.e. it is killed dead when it gets to you
 

better days

Well-Known Member
3.5m we need 80m & fast !!!
Maybe approaching that many eventually
But for now start with the big cities where the biggest numbers are appearing, especially London
And then gradually extend to towns and finally to rural areas
At present there are only a handful of cases in places like the Highlands of Scotland, Cornwall and rural Lincolnshire for example
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
I'm not arguing the point I'm more asking why the wariness exists.

basically... big pharma companies make billions by lobbying governments to make vaccinations compulsory at birth, which the pharma companies charge for. So you end up with babies being pumped full of things that they don't need and which have subsequently been linked strongly to Autism and other nasty things. I believe that in some places they have successfully got to the point where if you don't agree to have your baby vaccinated then you will never receive any kind of benefit, you are sanctioned. I also think that in some places kids end up having 20+ vaccinations, when there was nothing visibly symptomatic with any of them. There are quite a few celebs on that particular bandwagon I think- Jim Carrey being one?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
basically... big pharma companies make billions by lobbying governments to make vaccinations compulsory at birth, which the pharma companies charge for. So you end up with babies being pumped full of things that they don't need and which have subsequently been linked strongly to Autism and other nasty things. I believe that in some places they have successfully got to the point where if you don't agree to have your baby vaccinated then you will never receive any kind of benefit, you are sanctioned. I also think that in some places kids end up having 20+ vaccinations, when there was nothing visibly symptomatic with any of them. There are quite a few celebs on that particular bandwagon I think- Jim Carrey being one?

You do realise this originates from a completely debunked article in the Lancet which used a sample size of about 15?
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
But it's an insurance policy for the future of those children as they grow .
The mass are protected.

Yes I get that- and personally I think the Coronavirus vaccine is a no brainer, because without it the infection will never be controlled, I would think it would have to be compulsory.

But he is right though, there will be a lot of people that don't want it.

Just for the record for when people assume its me leading the anti-vaccination groups, I can state that at this point I would not refuse it :)

... but I do love a good conspiracy theory...
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
Vaccines are preventative in nature. To not take them out of one's own stupidity puts most of the others at needless risk.
Child vaccines are a minefield to say the least as one suggestion plenty online and on you tube regarding their ingredients probably for another day this one but don’t think for one minute Everyone will take this vaccine when it comes out many have no faith in the government or believe anything they say or do as said the numbers will be huge who refuse
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Child vaccines are a minefield to say the least as one suggestion plenty online and on you tube regarding their ingredients probably for another day this one but don’t think for one minute Everyone will take this vaccine when it comes out many have no faith in the government or believe anything they say or do as said the numbers will be huge who refuse

They won't believe experts in their field who have rigorously tested a vaccine through many different stages of scrutiny but will believe a hunch

Dumbasses deserve what they get.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Who would send their kids away now on a spring camp for two to three weeks.
So as to all catch it and come home immune?
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
They won't believe experts in their field who have rigorously tested a vaccine through many different stages of scrutiny but will believe a hunch

Dumbasses deserve what they get.
This won’t be rigorously tested though will it ? It’s gonna be rushed through without the years of testing ? I’m asthmatic so tbh I would be looking to take it my worry is where is the years of proven testing to say it’s safe,child vaccinations I’m 35 we had 12 compounds I believe it was back then now it’s 35-40 I think we are putting in.Wheh you get a moment google the ingredients in today’s child vaccines interesting read,

7 compounds I had when I was born there is 72 now in new born babies
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top