Match Thread Derby Match Thread (1 Viewer)

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
How many times did we play 5 at the back with our first choice backline?
How many times have played this season with our first choice team... It means very little... The management have the statistics, the analytics... They will know where we are weak, how we are losing games and they've tried to remedy it...
Do you think Robins sits there with all the data infront of him and doesn't think about what he's going to play and why?

He's playing what he thinks is going to get us points, each game at a time
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Abother good point!!!

Felt we looked comfortable all game long so annoyed to concede but this team doesnt give up and nice strike from hamer!!

I love way we play, so easy on eye.

Some thoughts:

Shipley is a passenger again. He always lets his man get away and is sloppy with even simple passes

Did mcallum have to go off? Goal came from a cross in thay corner. I thought mcallum was v good again though some sloppy mistakes today he needs to cut out

Kelly is playing really well although sometimes he passes like a pub player lol

O hare must sort out his finishing. It is costing us points

Wilson looks so assured. Marosi may have to wait to return at this rate!

Dabo looking kike Dabo of old


Good away point!!!
 

Cov kid 55

Well-Known Member
4 of Your next 5 games will be same, he shits himself at this level when playing fellow relegation strugglers, he see them as mustn’t lose games rather than very winnable.
Am I the only person who thinks this guy’s becoming a pain in the backside?
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
Abother good point!!!

Felt we looked comfortable all game long so annoyed to concede but this team doesnt give up and nice strike from hamer!!

I love way we play, so easy on eye.

Some thoughts:

Shipley is a passenger again. He always lets his man get away and is sloppy with even simple passes

Did mcallum have to go off? Goal came from a cross in thay corner. I thought mcallum was v good again though some sloppy mistakes today he needs to cut out

Kelly is playing really well although sometimes he passes like a pub player lol

O hare must sort out his finishing. It is costing us points

Wilson looks so assured. Marosi may have to wait to return at this rate!

Dabo looking kike Dabo of old


Good away point!!!
You think the way we are playing is easy on the eye ? 🤦🏻‍♂️
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Abother good point!!!

Felt we looked comfortable all game long so annoyed to concede but this team doesnt give up and nice strike from hamer!!

I love way we play, so easy on eye.

Some thoughts:

Shipley is a passenger again. He always lets his man get away and is sloppy with even simple passes

Did mcallum have to go off? Goal came from a cross in thay corner. I thought mcallum was v good again though some sloppy mistakes today he needs to cut out

Kelly is playing really well although sometimes he passes like a pub player lol

O hare must sort out his finishing. It is costing us points

Wilson looks so assured. Marosi may have to wait to return at this rate!

Dabo looking kike Dabo of old


Good away point!!!

How would you pick the side for Saturday CC4L?
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
How many times have played this season with our first choice team... It means very little... The management have the statistics, the analytics... They will know where we are weak, how we are losing games and they've tried to remedy it...
Do you think Robins sits there with all the data infront of him and doesn't think about what he's going to play and why?
Of course it means a lot. We were shipping goals while playing a left footer or a player clearly not good enough at right back and our captain and best defensive midfielder out. Now they're back we don't concede as much so we should clearly try and put some more attacking elements into our game by doing what got us scoring goals. It also means all of our best players end up in their best positions.
 

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
How many times have played this season with our first choice team... It means very little... The management have the statistics, the analytics... They will know where we are weak, how we are losing games and they've tried to remedy it...
Do you think Robins sits there with all the data infront of him and doesn't think about what he's going to play and why?

He's playing what he thinks is going to get us points, each game at a time
Who were we missing tonight from our first choice 4-2-3-1 XI aside from Marosi?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Look at each of those 7 goals and tell me how many were caused by the formation. You could perhaps argue Watford's 1st goal but let's be honest we had McCallum playing at RWB that game.

This is what happens when you just solely look at the results and not the performances or anything else.

I dont know what you want me to say, wing backs we ship goals, it's obviously a problem... The evidence is in front of you
 

higgs

Well-Known Member
Disappointing performance but this side are showing a never say die attitude again this season fighting to the end which is a good sign

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Don't mind what MR picks. Whatever formation we play same brand. Keep it on ground. Use sweeper keeper. It's all good

I imagine sheaf will be back in. I really hope Shipley will be dropped but we shall see.

Would you be inclined to go 2 up top or stay with 1?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Of course it means a lot. We were shipping goals while playing a left footer or a player clearly not good enough at right back and our captain and best defensive midfielder out. Now they're back we don't concede as much so we should clearly try and put some more attacking elements into our game by doing what got us scoring goals. It also means all of our best players end up in their best positions.

What you're actually saying is we had at any given time 1 player out of position in the back line...

Lads I'm all for playing whatever formation gets results... If it's wingbacks so be it.... But the fact is we shipped a ton of goals... Am I losing my mind here or are people being willfully blind to this
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I dont know what you want me to say, wing backs we ship goals, it's obviously a problem... The evidence is in front of you

I want you to say how that specific 5-3-2 is the reason we shipped goals and you seem to be struggling massively to show it. You can't because they weren't caused by the formation and other teams' poor finishing doesn't make this any better
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Would you be inclined to go 2 up top or stay with 1?
A lone striker has to offer more than Walker does in general play, for me we don't have that type of player for this level so we need to go 2 up top.

I really rate him, but he touched the ball just 10 times in 76 minutes, he completed just 2 of his 6 passes. That not good enough for a lone striker. He stopped even challenging for the ball in the second half, not one tackle, not one foul (like leaving one on the centre back like kazim did.

Its not his fault, its not his game.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
What you're actually saying is we had at any given time 1 player out of position in the back line...

Lads I'm all for playing whatever formation gets results... If it's wingbacks so be it.... But the fact is we shipped a ton of goals... Am I losing my mind here or are people being willfully blind to this
The goals, as have been pointed out to you, were due to mainly individual errors or poor work at set pieces. Not by playing wing backs.

They happened when we had worse defensive players available to us than we do now.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
I want you to say how that specific 5-3-2 is the reason we shipped goals and you seem to be struggling massively to show it. You can't because they weren't caused by the formation and other teams' poor finishing doesn't make this any better

I can't point you to exactly why the 532 cost us games... I can only point you to the amount of goals conceded in those games, and the amount of goals conceded in the other games when we tried a different variation of wing back systems...

Then when we play 4 at the back we stop leaking goals but stop scoring...

Obviously system comes into play here doesnt it
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
The goals, as have been pointed out to you, were due to mainly individual errors or poor work at set pieces. Not by playing wing backs.

They happened when we had worse defensive players available to us than we do now.

If it wasn't to do with the system... Robins would be playing it every week still no? If it was just because dabo was out... We'd be playing it still no?

This argument is completely flawed, because I can't blame the system for a defeat but I can praise it for wins... What is it?

I like the system BTW... But see its flaws like when we switched into it against blues and looked like we would concede?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I can't point you to exactly why the 532 cost us games... I can only point you to the amount of goals conceded in those games, and the amount of goals conceded in the other games when we tried a different variation of wing back systems...

Then when we play 4 at the back we stop leaking goals but stop scoring...

Obviously system comes into play here doesnt it

Yes. If you play ten men behind the ball for 90 mins against the worst teams in the division you don’t concede.

Except when you do.

Then you go two up top to salvage a draw.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
I can't point you to exactly why the 532 cost us games... I can only point you to the amount of goals conceded in those games, and the amount of goals conceded in the other games when we tried a different variation of wing back systems...

Then when we play 4 at the back we stop leaking goals but stop scoring...

Obviously system comes into play here doesnt it
We've scored 2 goals, one a massive error, while we've had 1 striker on the pitch in 10 games.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I can't point you to exactly why the 532 cost us games... I can only point you to the amount of goals conceded in those games, and the amount of goals conceded in the other games when we tried a different variation of wing back systems...

Then when we play 4 at the back we stop leaking goals but stop scoring...

Obviously system comes into play here doesnt it

I can point you to why we conceded each of those 7 goals and how other teams let us off the hook since. The of course we only concede a very dubious penalty at Norwich and that seems to get forgotten amidst all the backslapping about draws against the worse sides in this league
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
We've scored 2 goals, one a massive error, while we've had 1 striker on the pitch in 10 games.
So Obviously the system is a factor then isn't it... Exactly like the wing back systems being a factor in us conceding so many right?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Yes. If you play ten men behind the ball for 90 mins against the worst teams in the division you don’t concede.

Except when you do.

Then you go two up top to salvage a draw.

But like I said a minute ago we switched to 2 up against blues and almost threw it away as they suddenly took control once we switched to wing backs?
 

Tartan Specials

Well-Known Member
You think the way we are playing is easy on the eye ? 🤦🏻‍♂️
I genuinely think it is. Other than Fadz kicking the ball (and in fairness that's what he's been trained to do) aimlessly up the park, we're pretty comfortable on the ball. Derby's centre half was bought by Arsenal for 2.5 million as a seventeen year old. Perspective and all that. Anyways, here's to staying up.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Fucking hell up to 19th and 5 pts off Barnsley despite hsving played all top 7 and prem relegated teams after coming off double promotion

Yet that Barnsley lad knows more than robins lmao you slimey cunts should be ashamed of yourselves
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
But like I said a minute ago we switched to 2 up against blues and almost threw it away as they suddenly took control once we switched to wing backs?

Juke was given a free header in the first half and we also still gave the ball away in criminal areas, just Birmingham weren't as clinical. It's just weird how people seem to keep working backwards from the conclusion and still never look at the goals we conceded in relation to the shape
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
So Obviously the system is a factor then isn't it... Exactly like the wing back systems being a factor in us conceding so many right?
What I was trying to point out was that you can isolate individual statistics to make things look better or worse. The formation not being the be all and end all, our lack of scoring now isn't just down to the formation, it's down to the players we have in it being out of position, the areas in the field we play leaving the striker too isolated and playing it long at the wrong time. Just like conceding before wasn't down to playing 532 it was down to silly individual mistakes and a zonal system from set pieces.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I genuinely think it is. Other than Fadz kicking the ball (and in fairness that's what he's been trained to do) aimlessly up the park, we're pretty comfortable on the ball. Derby's centre half was bought by Arsenal for 2.5 million as a seventeen year old. Perspective and all that. Anyways, here's to staying up.

The second half was wave after wave of them coming at us and us returning possession soon after getting it back. When we play that way it needs someone to find killer passes or Walker to work a minor miracle
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Thinking our shape had nothing to do with the goals we concede is something I'm sure Andy Thorn used to think


Infact I'm positive he did because he stuck despite its flaws
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top