Philosoraptor
Well-Known Member
New Best for the fourth game in a row.
He’s average but he has his moments. We chased him all summer,like Chaplin the summer before. I wouldn’t pay money for sheaf if that is an option which I doubt it is.I agree with you on Sheaf, he does give the ball away a lot, but bring him back in to break up play, as he is ok doing that.
He’s average but he has his moments. We chased him all summer,like Chaplin the summer before. I wouldn’t pay money for sheaf if that is an option which I doubt it is.
Sheaf has the highest pass completion rate of any of our players at 84.8%. He plays the occasional hospital pass which everyone remembers and it becomes a myth that he gives it away a lot.I agree with you on Sheaf, he does give the ball away a lot, but bring him back in to break up play, as he is ok doing that.
And gives the ball away. I’m not convinced on him tbh. I’m sure he’ll improve but not convinced but with our squad I hope he’ll start with Kelly and hamer (much better players) on sat so we can play 2 upfront.£750k would be a snip for Sheaf, he’s one of the only players we have who can play on the half turn and receive in tight areas. The only way that deal isn’t happening is if we get relegated.
Short passes mean shitSheaf has the highest pass completion rate of any of our players at 84.8%. He plays the occasional hospital pass which everyone remembers and it becomes a myth that he gives it away a lot.
Doncaster fans said the same thing yet he was in the top players for passing in League One.
Short passes mean shit
Short passes mean shit
Grendell darling, right?“It doesn’t count, it was in the Cup”
Just own up to being wrong.
The ones he doesn’t give away. Have you tucked Grendel in yet? What game has this central midfield wonder influenced? NoneLol - what passes matter then?
The ones he doesn’t give away. Have you tucked Grendel in yet? What game has this central midfield wonder influenced? None
He’s not in the team to influence or win games. You show little understanding of football and certain roles
So what does he do then? Give the ball away? 84 p/c from short passes (not his fault, most of them will be taking the ball of a ch and passing it back, getting it back and making a pass to the opponents). Does he set up goals? No. Can he play the Kelly role? No. Ball retention? Not really but I’d play him on sat because we need an extra body in midfield alongside Kelly and hamer. If you think he’s made an impact as the player we chased for a month all summer then you are deluded.He’s not in the team to influence or win games. You show little understanding of football and certain roles
In joke I take it? If not we’ve won 2 promotions in 3 seasons. Btw, in new to this site and not a former member under another name. You and you’re cronies drag this site down bad boynothings changed in 5 years
So what does he do then? Give the ball away? 84 p/c from short passes (not his fault, most of them will be taking the ball of a ch and passing it back, getting it back and making a pass to the opponents). Does he set up goals? No. Can he play the Kelly role? No. Ball retention? Not really but I’d play him on sat because we need an extra body in midfield alongside Kelly and hamer. If you think he’s made an impact as the player we chased for a month all summer then you are deluded.
It’s not nonsense. He gifted a goal to Bournemouth. He’s not good at defending or attacking, he’s just taking the ball of a defender, playing it back, getting it back, playing it to another defender getting it back, give it to a midfielder, get it back, play it back, give it away. Like you said he’s young but I cannot believe we chased this player for a month. Kelly came in and results have changed. Sheaf has made very little positive impact.This is just nonsense. He’s got some of the best passing range in the squad and is always high on interceptions. We missed him on Tuesday. He’s made a couple of bad passes, but so have most of the team. They’re all young and learning the level.
So what does he do then? Give the ball away? 84 p/c from short passes (not his fault, most of them will be taking the ball of a ch and passing it back, getting it back and making a pass to the opponents). Does he set up goals? No. Can he play the Kelly role? No. Ball retention? Not really but I’d play him on sat because we need an extra body in midfield alongside Kelly and hamer. If you think he’s made an impact as the player we chased for a month all summer then you are deluded.
Sheaf also completes more tackles per game than any of our other players.It’s not nonsense. He gifted a goal to Bournemouth. He’s not good at defending or attacking, he’s just taking the ball of a defender, playing it back, getting it back, playing it to another defender getting it back, give it to a midfielder, get it back, play it back, give it away. Like you said he’s young but I cannot believe we chased this player for a month. Kelly came in and results have changed. Sheaf has made very little positive impact.
It’s not nonsense. He gifted a goal to Bournemouth. He’s not good at defending or attacking, he’s just taking the ball of a defender, playing it back, getting it back, playing it to another defender getting it back, give it to a midfielder, get it back, play it back, give it away. Like you said he’s young but I cannot believe we chased this player for a month. Kelly came in and results have changed. Sheaf has made very little positive impact.
Claiming that Sheaf gifted a goal to Bournemouth is a pure fantasy scenario concocted to support your narrative. If anyone was at fault for the goals in the Bournemouth game it was Hamer.It’s not nonsense. He gifted a goal to Bournemouth. He’s not good at defending or attacking, he’s just taking the ball of a defender, playing it back, getting it back, playing it to another defender getting it back, give it to a midfielder, get it back, play it back, give it away. Like you said he’s young but I cannot believe we chased this player for a month. Kelly came in and results have changed. Sheaf has made very little positive impact.
Goal not goals, and Hamer was on the pitch when he played his atrocious back pass which led to a goal. Hardly a fantasy scenario. How was Hamer at fault for the goals? He got sent off and they scored one goal as a result.Claiming that Sheaf gifted a goal to Bournemouth is a pure fantasy scenario concocted to support your narrative. If anyone was at fault for the goals in the Bournemouth game it was Hamer.
So what does he do then? Give the ball away? 84 p/c from short passes (not his fault, most of them will be taking the ball of a ch and passing it back, getting it back and making a pass to the opponents). Does he set up goals? No. Can he play the Kelly role? No. Ball retention? Not really but I’d play him on sat because we need an extra body in midfield alongside Kelly and hamer. If you think he’s made an impact as the player we chased for a month all summer then you are deluded.
You just said he isn’t good at ball retention in one post and then described him as doing exactly that in another post. He makes space for himself with ease. He’s been sloppy a couple of times, but no more than anyone else.It’s not nonsense. He gifted a goal to Bournemouth. He’s not good at defending or attacking, he’s just taking the ball of a defender, playing it back, getting it back, playing it to another defender getting it back, give it to a midfielder, get it back, play it back, give it away. Like you said he’s young but I cannot believe we chased this player for a month. Kelly came in and results have changed. Sheaf has made very little positive impact.
New to this site?In joke I take it? If not we’ve won 2 promotions in 3 seasons. Btw, in new to this site and not a former member under another name. You and you’re cronies drag this site down bad boy
Only half the time?People take their "football knowledge" so seriously. Pure waffle half of the time.
Didn't Sheat get brought down for our penalty against Bournemouth?Goal not goals, and Hamer was on the pitch when he played his atrocious back pass which led to a goal. Hardly a fantasy scenario. How was Hamer at fault for the goals? He got sent off and they scored one goal as a result.
Did you even watch the game, or in fact even watch the highlights? None of the goals were the result of a Sheaf backpass and Hamer was sent off at 3-1.Goal not goals, and Hamer was on the pitch when he played his atrocious back pass which led to a goal. Hardly a fantasy scenario. How was Hamer at fault for the goals? He got sent off and they scored one goal as a result.
BlackLol - what passes matter then?
Looking again at the highlights I can't see anything that suggests Sheaf was to blame for any of their goals, their first came from a left wing cross, the second was Hamer's fault if anyone's, and for their 3rd Sheaf gets nutmegged but it was really a result of Dabo not being tight enough on their goalscorer, (number 4)It’s not nonsense. He gifted a goal to Bournemouth. He’s not good at defending or attacking, he’s just taking the ball of a defender, playing it back, getting it back, playing it to another defender getting it back, give it to a midfielder, get it back, play it back, give it away. Like you said he’s young but I cannot believe we chased this player for a month. Kelly came in and results have changed. Sheaf has made very little positive impact.