Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (37 Viewers)

wingy

Well-Known Member
Yeah just fag packet maths, but I think people forget small percentages of very large numbers are still large numbers.
It's a bit like the chat I was having with David last Autumn.
With testing what would the number of cases likely be at Wembley due to the less than 100% reliability of the test.
Think he was saying around 3000. ,equating to the shortcomings of the test .
But I couldn't see it being that due to the prevailing levels at that time in the community ,rather than assuming it would be 100% of those who'd had a rogue result.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
It's a bit like the chat I was having with David last Autumn.
With testing what would the number of cases likely be at Wembley due to the less than 100% reliability of the test.
Think he was saying around 3000. ,equating to the shortcomings of the test .
But I couldn't see it being that due to the prevailing levels at that time in the community ,rather than assuming it would be 100% of those who'd had a rogue result.

that was the % of possible false negatives and positives even if something is 97% accurate there is the potential for 30 false results per 1000. This means that if you test a Wembley sized crowd with the with the machine you mentioned there could be 2700 false results.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Good numbers coming back from recent sporting events and the raves in.Liverpool.
Very few cases, though of course everyone took tests prior to entry.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I don't have a problem with the local lockdowns being based on guidance, not really sure what the fuss is about.
Lockdown #1 showed that the public took guidance as being equal to law, e.g. the limitation on outdoor exercise which didn't exist in law but did in the guidance
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I don't have a problem with the local lockdowns being based on guidance, not really sure what the fuss is about.
Lockdown #1 showed that the public took guidance as being equal to law, e.g. the limitation on outdoor exercise which didn't exist in law but did in the guidance
I agree it’s the inability to take ownership for it. Government should have said different rules apply in these areas for the reasons they need to be rather than do it on the sly. It’s as if they don’t want to be accountable and are placing the responsibility on individuals in those areas
 
D

Deleted member 11652

Guest
Not like Grenners to not have actually seen or have any knowledge of have he is talking about,

Cummings even said it was madness he was even allowed to be at the heart of government.

Just ran this through google translate and even that is baffled? Been on the booze down the 4 p’s this morning?
 

jordan210

Well-Known Member
giphy.gif
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
He's a lunatic trying to dissolve himself of culpability - he's like a scorned woman after a divorce - he's chip paper by the end of the day

He's apologised for his own mistakes, he is not a government minister. I said this last year that it was convenient for the govt either way that he was around.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
It presumed that people would not be willing to stay at home in order to prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths. Or even to protect themselves. It's incredible to me that this was treated as consensus.

But apparently it's Labour that think the public are idiots. When will people learn the opinion the Tories have of them is far, far worse. They're just as careful as possible to not say it in public.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Funny how Cummings was a c-unit last year now he’s to some on here their best mate now and believe his every word.

Also funny how he was a legend last year to some and now the same people think he's a lying twat.

He was a c**t then and he's a c**t now.

BUT, he is at least admitting blame and fault, unlike Johnson & Hancock.

Also whilst he is probably still telling some lies he has evidence of some of the stuff he's saying.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Funny how Cummings was a c-unit last year to some on here now he’s their best mate now and believe his every word.😆👍

Oh, I don't. I'm very sceptical about the whole 'inject me with coronavirus' crap and I'm sure a lot of this is Cartman-esque in rewriting the story in his own head.

But the fact that he can say this stuff and for people to think "yeah, that might be true' is damning enough in itself. If there was any kind of competence at all everyone's immediate reaction would be "bullshit!" to what he's saying.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
And those in government will try and discredit him after backing him up about his eyesight nonsense and some will lap it up….

Wonder how long it'll be before someone lets slip that his story for making that trip was bollocks
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Oh, I don't. I'm very sceptical about the whole 'inject me with coronavirus' crap and I'm sure a lot of this is Cartman-esque in rewriting the story in his own head.

But the fact that he can say this stuff and for people to think "yeah, that might be true' is damning enough in itself. If there was any kind of competence at all everyone's immediate reaction would be "bullshit!" to what he's saying.

A lot of it is backed by evidence and what we already knew anyway. Maybe not the “and then everyone clapped because Dom is awesome” stuff, but the general thrust.
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
Funny how Cummings was a c-unit last year to some on here now he’s their best mate now and believe his every word.😆👍
That's not even remotely true. He remains a dangerous man who, as he admits himself, should have been nowhere near power. He is the architect of Brexit so if you trash him you are admitting Brexit was built by a maverick.
It all demonstrates what we've known all along that we are led by donkeys.
Nobody who knew he was in the wrong last year has changed their minds about him. What he says is only to be believed if
1) the evidence we know about (or emerges in time) supports his account.
2) the counter points made by Boris fans fall apart.

What is obvious to me is that some people are so tied to being right about Brexit and Johnson that they will ignore the truth that we have a shambolic government.
Incidentally he made two points that, to me, were beyond dispute
- he called it crackers that people like him and Johnson were anywhere near power
- he said the system that gave us a choice between two disastrous leaders, Johnson and Corbyn, was catastrophic.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top