Londonccfcfan
Well-Known Member
Rose 5? That high...You still think hes better defender than Hyam? Lol
Ratings (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
rob9872
Well-Known Member
Cant believe the ratings for Waghorn I thought he was awful and can't remember a single decent thing he did. In fact the front three were abysmal. Tbh everyone calling for Ohare on the radio, for me it was Sheaf we missed most. Allen could've been in behind the front 2. Hamer was stand out player and I actually thought Maatsen was ok too despite the low scores on here.
Speedies_Chips
Well-Known Member
Ditto.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Hyams had worse games and made worse mistakes. But right now, no Rose and Fadz are miles off form.
larry_david
Well-Known Member
Rose and mcfadz both been in and out of the team recently 'rotating' and now both out of form. We need to stop tinkering.
Evo1883
Well-Known Member
Not this season he hasn't mate
pusbccfc
Well-Known Member
Spot on. He's missed a lot of good chances in the last few months
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
He has. He’s been in form recently and really come on but still has the ability to lose the ball in dangerous areas, still plays people on, and still looks like a rabbit in headlights when someone runs at him.
The whole back line needs looking at TBH.
larry_david
Well-Known Member
MR has just said Jamie Allen was phenomenal...
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Maybe he really gees the boys up in the dressing room after a loss cos on the pitch he’s anonymous.
Evo1883
Well-Known Member
Hyams had a very good season to be fair .. just won a player of the month award too.
Superior to rose defensively
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Hes been excellent the last few months. Still think we need better across the board. Todays goal was poor but we’ve let in poor goals all season.
stevefloyd
Well-Known Member
To be fair he's not going to say he wasn’t very good and didn't do anything of note BUT he was probably our best passer tonight.. I can't remember him giving the ball away but he probably did
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Thats because he never does anything with it. He’s best breaking forward, but he’s never going to unlock a defence.
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee
Well-Known Member
I sat behind the goal tonight rather than our usual spot in block 18, feel like I got a different (and apparently incorrect) perspective. Thought Maatsen and Gyokeres were our best players, realise this goes against the majority so imagine I am wrong. Thought Waghorn was perfectly fine. Not sure why the negative marks. Allen was totally anonymous, feel like I could have played there and no one would have noticed. Hamer did some stuff well but also felt like he was trying too much as he was the only one doing anything from midfield. Feel like they shouldn’t have scored from that angle.
Also Godden offered absolutely nothing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also Godden offered absolutely nothing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stevefloyd
Well-Known Member
Totally agree
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Sparks thinks Gyo is a better finisher than Godden
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Wake up Godden isn’t fit
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee
Well-Known Member
Cheers Einstein. Just giving my view on tonight’s game. I’m sure if I’d written a few players off you would have fully backed it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Nobody done much Hamer possibly pick of a bad bunch
SkyblueDad
Well-Known Member
Five out of ten all round possibly 5.5 for Hamer & JCS Luton no better but for mistake by Rose almost certainly a 0-0. Poor match.
Last edited:
Wyken Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I didn't think Waghorn was bad, just breakdown in communication between some of his play and as some have said he's on some of the boo boys list so naturally going to come across worse than anyone else.
You could see him putting his arm up wanting the ball, probably a confidence thing, if he makes a good pass with fans clapping makes him feel better. Some around me last night sarcastically cheers when he went off, shocking
Majority of players were equal or worse. FP's ratings second post in are spot on
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
You could see him putting his arm up wanting the ball, probably a confidence thing, if he makes a good pass with fans clapping makes him feel better. Some around me last night sarcastically cheers when he went off, shocking
Majority of players were equal or worse. FP's ratings second post in are spot on
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
ms639
Well-Known Member
Anyone who gave waghorn higher than a 4 needs to have a word with themselves. An experiment that didn’t work. Took any pace / fluidity out of our forward play every time he got the ball. We attack at pace and it’s crucial that the player in the 10 drives at their back 4, he looked like he was carrying a house on his back
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Nick
Administrator
Did you watch the whole game?
Hamer - MOM and Vik had some flashes of great hold up play although didn’t really look like scoring. Apart from that mainly average, with a couple of poor performances chucked in
We controlled the game well until their goal, which was poor. Thought Rose looked shaky on a few occasions (not just goal) and JCS who Im a fan of, also wasn’t as solid as usual. I generally think we look better with Hyam, Fadz and JCS as back three
Didn’t really create enough and front line looked a bit one paced until Ohare and Taveres introduced, with everything played in front of Luton for a lot of the game. I didn’t mind the three forward gamble prior to kick off….worth a crack. Pains me to say it as Jones winds me up but they were set up well for an away team and did a bit of a job on us even though some of their play was awful. Hard to break down and didn’t give many chances away apart from ohare at the end, Goddens in first minute and Viks first half (when Hamer should’ve shot)
Not getting an AM/attacker with pace in Jan has cost us.
Edit - not sure if this has been mentioned but a mate told me Luton have won something like 15 out of 16 where they have taken the lead and 7 out of 7 away…so moral of the story…don’t give them a fucking goal head start !!!
We controlled the game well until their goal, which was poor. Thought Rose looked shaky on a few occasions (not just goal) and JCS who Im a fan of, also wasn’t as solid as usual. I generally think we look better with Hyam, Fadz and JCS as back three
Didn’t really create enough and front line looked a bit one paced until Ohare and Taveres introduced, with everything played in front of Luton for a lot of the game. I didn’t mind the three forward gamble prior to kick off….worth a crack. Pains me to say it as Jones winds me up but they were set up well for an away team and did a bit of a job on us even though some of their play was awful. Hard to break down and didn’t give many chances away apart from ohare at the end, Goddens in first minute and Viks first half (when Hamer should’ve shot)
Not getting an AM/attacker with pace in Jan has cost us.
Edit - not sure if this has been mentioned but a mate told me Luton have won something like 15 out of 16 where they have taken the lead and 7 out of 7 away…so moral of the story…don’t give them a fucking goal head start !!!
Last edited:
rob9872
Well-Known Member
Tbf I agree with him. We all see differrent things grom different angles, upu thought Maatsen was awful, I think he was far more positive and created more than Waghorn even his LB back role. That said, Waghorn doesn't deserve abuse here or on other platforms and I blame Robins for the selection not the players. If his strike partners had taken any of the great chances provided albeit not by him, then we wouldn't be discussing it.
Londonccfcfan
Well-Known Member
Can see both sides of the argument with Waghorn.
Hes being made the scapegoat which is grossly unfair.
Hes being made the scapegoat which is grossly unfair.
SBAndy
Well-Known Member
Generally don’t mind Waghorn but thought his first half performance yesterday was pathetic. Given the system we play, it’s imperative that whoever is operating in that #10 position moves laterally to link play between wing back, midfielder and striker. Far too often he was on the opposite side of the pitch ambling around, almost like he was playing up top as well as the other 2. Also a real lack of drive when space opened up - I appreciate he’s not the quickest any more but at least look to commit a defender and create space elsewhere. There was a couple of minutes where I noticed him standing behind opposition players and essentially hiding from play, that was very disappointing.
Second half he did pick up a bit, but there were also times I felt a bit sorry for him as most of what he was trying just didn’t come off. His confidence is shot to shit.
Second half he did pick up a bit, but there were also times I felt a bit sorry for him as most of what he was trying just didn’t come off. His confidence is shot to shit.
AOM
Well-Known Member
Don't think Waghorn will ever win some supporters round now regardless. Offered more than Godden last night, and in hindsight think it would have been better to keep him on and sub Godden for O'Hare.
Both of them look like they're running through treacle at times though. Desperately need a bit more pace up front
Both of them look like they're running through treacle at times though. Desperately need a bit more pace up front
olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
Hamer as mom by most, when he gave the ball away countless times last night, shows where a lot of the problems lie. He was one of many who did that. So many passes going straight to the opposition frustrated the hell out of me Last night.
having said that, if we had strikers that could convert a higher % of chances, we would have won.
having said that, if we had strikers that could convert a higher % of chances, we would have won.
Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
Kane should have run toward Adebayo instead of angling to get into the box and it would have made life a bit more dificult! Moore should never have let that ball go across him into the net!