David O'Day
Well-Known Member
wow indeed
Goal or no goal (19 Viewers)
- Thread starter robbiekeane
- Start date
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
Then you'd need a tiny line to work out if it had actually crossed.
hill83
Well-Known Member
Ah, I think that leaves it open to interpretation then though, where is the middle of the line.
Better off as it is.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
If you look closely the defender heads it, it rolls along the line and then starts to go in slightly more. I think they have stopped it exactly when the ball is furthest over.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Halfway between the two edges? I mean if we have sub mm level accuracy tech anyway…
I voted no goal before these pics BTW, I’m just saying it’s never felt right to me. Same as high feet or shepherding the ball, just something that doesn’t sit right despite being the rules.
GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee
Well-Known Member
Fucking hell, Grendel is actually right about something, you’re properly mental.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hill83
Well-Known Member
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
simply not true, video shows that
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
I'm starting to believe the Grendel slander on being a boozer might be right too as you'd have to be seeing double with all this proof.
Dave, it's the ball on the left mate.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
everyone is right about you as well
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
ok then
lifeskyblue
Well-Known Member
Are my eyes deceiving me….when the still with ball occurs is a fraction after the point the ball bounces off defenders head. Still no goal (by a millimetre), fraction before over line
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
it is after it hits their player
hill83
Well-Known Member
Yes it is, it even moves further towards the goal after it hits their players head (which is when the still is taken), I assume because as it hits him he is sliding into the goal himself.
skybluesam66
Well-Known Member
measuring the still
the line is 12cm wide maximum
we are talking about 1cm from a goal -
however it was much more of a goal than one which won England the world cup
the line is 12cm wide maximum
we are talking about 1cm from a goal -
however it was much more of a goal than one which won England the world cup
Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
We have to have the ball over the line rule or every game would finish 90 - 90
Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
Give it up. You’ve had your 15 minutes of fame
Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
The line is part of the penalty area. Yes the rule includes all lines
That still is after the ball has come back towards the line after hitting his back.
It was more advanced than that in contact on his back.
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
Yeh fair enough i was wrong I guess.
I am genuinely looking at this still below though thinking...that is a goal. If that was a throw in line people would be saying thats out for a throw. I think it would make more sense if it was whether the middle of the ball has crossed the edge of the line, no?
But anyway thats not the rule and i was wrong
I am genuinely looking at this still below though thinking...that is a goal. If that was a throw in line people would be saying thats out for a throw. I think it would make more sense if it was whether the middle of the ball has crossed the edge of the line, no?
But anyway thats not the rule and i was wrong
robbiekeane
Well-Known Member
Well yeh it was worth discussion because how many times have we grabbed a late equaliser when we have momentum and the crowds and players smell blood and are mad for it. Turns out to be the right decision anyway but to say it wasn’t worth discussing is silly
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
CT
You are correct (although I voted it as a goal!) - loads of throw ins are given, when the ball hasn't gone out of play. Always does my head in (and players, I suspect) Even less excuse for them, as lino is literally looking along the line for them.
You are correct (although I voted it as a goal!) - loads of throw ins are given, when the ball hasn't gone out of play. Always does my head in (and players, I suspect) Even less excuse for them, as lino is literally looking along the line for them.
the rumpo kid
Well-Known Member
Why wasn't it shown on the big screen In the ground at the time? When they showed every other save or near miss in the game.
Why did the ref touch the devise on his wrist straight away ? Was it switched on ?
Why were to good penalty shouts waved away ? By the same ref who waved away to good penalty shouts for us when we played Cardiff .
Why did the linesman on the east side miss throws and goal kicks that were clearly out of play ?
Why was there only 4 minutes injury time when there were 6 subs (3 mins) plus 2 sit down injuries were the players went to the touch line plus the endless time wasting from hull even in the first half ?
I think the ref at least needs to be looked at by the EFL about competency.
Why did the ref touch the devise on his wrist straight away ? Was it switched on ?
Why were to good penalty shouts waved away ? By the same ref who waved away to good penalty shouts for us when we played Cardiff .
Why did the linesman on the east side miss throws and goal kicks that were clearly out of play ?
Why was there only 4 minutes injury time when there were 6 subs (3 mins) plus 2 sit down injuries were the players went to the touch line plus the endless time wasting from hull even in the first half ?
I think the ref at least needs to be looked at by the EFL about competency.
Last edited:
Lord_Nampil
Well-Known Member
What are rules for players keeping the ball in play but aren’t in play them
Selfs? As he’s in the goal when he stops the ball going in he actually is not in play…. Does any one know??
Selfs? As he’s in the goal when he stops the ball going in he actually is not in play…. Does any one know??
mark82
Super Moderator
The replay on TV is irrelevant. The technology was working and got it right. There's no real argument to be had. Shows how deceptive an angle can be as looked miles over on the live stream last night.
Nick
Administrator
Isn't where they pause it and slow it down the same as what the goal system uses though?
MalcSB
Well-Known Member
TheQuest still is too late in the incident. It’s a goal when it hits the back of the grounded player and bounces down, well over the line, before rolling back toward the goal line and being cleared as it approaches the line from inside th goal. The point at which Quest have made the assessment. So no, I haven’t ignored it, I have discounted it because they haven’t done it correctly.
JimmyHillsbeard
Well-Known Member
Didn’t know from behind the goal last night. If the ref’s watch doesn’t buzz (and he was clearly repeatedly telling the players of both sides this) there’s no way he can give a goal.
Much more pivotal was the decision to not give a penalty for the blatant foul on Tavares - the ball had gone but he was cleaned out. If (and only if) we scored a penalty with 15 minutes to go we would have had significant momentum.
Apart from that the Ref did quite well, and Hull were excellent.
Much more pivotal was the decision to not give a penalty for the blatant foul on Tavares - the ball had gone but he was cleaned out. If (and only if) we scored a penalty with 15 minutes to go we would have had significant momentum.
Apart from that the Ref did quite well, and Hull were excellent.
CovBrummie94
Well-Known Member
We sit right in line with the goal and it split opinion between the 12 in my group. Personally I didn't think it had crossed the line at the time. The technology confirmed that.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Yeah aside from the three blatant penalties he missed and his inability to get a handle on the excessive time wasting happening from the sixth minute the ref was fine. Kinda big asides though.