SISU ready to sell? (1 Viewer)

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest

bawtryneal

Well-Known Member
Well ideally the Brentford owner I guess. Someone who is rich and only interested in the club

He is only interested in the club if it is making money. Watch what happens when they are relegated.
There model is not sustainable long term. Brentford is another Bournemouth (in terms of fanbase and opportunity to increase revenue) albeit with a different cash injection and investment approach.
Whist you have to admire there success and agree there "ownership model" is a big step up from SISU it is sadly not sustainable in the PL.
The model only works with TV revenues
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
So that makes the type of organisation who rides roughshod over culture of clubs ideal for us now then.

And there never try and change that, nope.

It's like some don't learn from SISU or Wasps, and want to hear no evil
In fairness Jimmy Hill tried to change this club's name to Coventry Talbot in the 80s

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
He is only interested in the club if it is making money. Watch what happens when they are relegated.
There model is not sustainable long term. Brentford is another Bournemouth (in terms of fanbase and opportunity to increase revenue) albeit with a different cash injection and investment approach.
Whist you have to admire there success and agree there "ownership model" is a big step up from SISU it is sadly not sustainable in the PL.
The model only works with TV revenues
Every club in the PL to some extent is reliant on the TV deal

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

AOM

Well-Known Member
But don't Red Bull completely rebrand their football teams in their own image including the team names, kits and club badges?

1_bSgIwPXe6L6MpYZX5Y6rtg.png

Not sure if the above is completely up to date, but the only resemblance to what we were would be we have 'Coventry' in the team name.

I can understand fans wanting more success and top flight football again, but I'd not want that at the cost of losing the clubs identity as well
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I would hate for RB to take us over and rebrand us but do feel the need to remind people that’s essentially what Jimmy Hill did when he arrived.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
He may have rebranded us, but we still had our identity and culture, not a fucking shitty energy drink and F1 brand all over us. I would fucking hate that, tastes like cat piss
Agree with your comments on RB, horrible stuff. I think our current identity is all Jimmy Hill though, he introduced the sky blue shirt, the sky blues nickname and indeed wrote the original lyrics to the sky blue song and put it to the music of the Eton boating song.
 

hammerman

Member
I think Sisu have realised that they can’t take the club any further forward. Realistically, they won’t get a massive price for us either. Listening to the price of football podcast last week, they were saying that on paper you can only value players on what they were purchased for. So in real terms that’s 5-8 million tops. I’m not sure how much the training ground is worth? Maybe 5-6 million. So in essence we’re worth £15m tops and we don’t have the lease for the ground. I can’t see what Sisu’s exit plan is.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I think Sisu have realised that they can’t take the club any further forward. Realistically, they won’t get a massive price for us either. Listening to the price of football podcast last week, they were saying that on paper you can only value players on what they were purchased for. So in real terms that’s 5-8 million tops. I’m not sure how much the training ground is worth? Maybe 5-6 million. So in essence we’re worth £15m tops and we don’t have the lease for the ground. I can’t see what Sisu’s exit plan is.
Did they say the value of the Golden Share was? Did they put a value on it at all when it came to selling a club?
 

steve cooper

Well-Known Member
I think Sisu have realised that they can’t take the club any further forward. Realistically, they won’t get a massive price for us either. Listening to the price of football podcast last week, they were saying that on paper you can only value players on what they were purchased for. So in real terms that’s 5-8 million tops. I’m not sure how much the training ground is worth? Maybe 5-6 million. So in essence we’re worth £15m tops and we don’t have the lease for the ground. I can’t see what Sisu’s exit plan is.
For Sisu, it's a bit like doing the lottery every week. You know your chances of coming out on top long term are close to zero but you can't stop in case your numbers come up next week. Sisy's only hope of getting their money back is if we somehow get to the premier league. Hence their comment about third party investment.
 

hammerman

Member
Did they say the value of the Golden Share was? Did they put a value on it at all when it came to selling a club?
It’s worth no physical value what so ever. you can’t list it in the accounts as an asset. We all know it’s worth something in the long run but you can’t list it as an asset because the EFL can revoke it at any time.
 

hammerman

Member
For Sisu, it's a bit like doing the lottery every week. You know your chances of coming out on top long term are close to zero but you can't stop in case your numbers come up next week. Sisy's only hope of getting their money back is if we somehow get to the premier league. Hence their comment about third party investment.
I think your right. Ithink Sisu said that they had pumped £30m in to the club over the years and they want this money back. They're not going to sell up now when we’re worth maybe half of that amount and no stadium ownership. I can’t see how a third party investment is going to help in obtaining the lease either. Wasps or the council will not deal with the 3rd party if they are on the board of the football club.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Agree with your comments on RB, horrible stuff. I think our current identity is all Jimmy Hill though, he introduced the sky blue shirt, the sky blues nickname and indeed wrote the original lyrics to the sky blue song and put it to the music of the Eton boating song.
It is a bit weird how people talk about the identity and how it'd be sacrilege to change it when most revere the man who changed our identity in the 1960's and consider him our finest manager. We're not Singers anymore. Or the Bantams. Our first kit was black. The badge changes subtly all the time as looks nothing like our original badge.

Would I like a complete rebranding under such a deal? Not particularly. Would I like us to have a generic Red Bull crest? No. I could handle an away kit in RB corporate colours but not the home. Would Sky Blue Sam end up being a Red Bull Elephant?

Not that it matters as it's highly unlikely to ever happen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top