Wasps going into admin & the impact on CCFC (132 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
The bidding war by the sounds of it was the pre-pack admin, between MA and NEC. Any genuine bidders would have come forward then.
But it stands to reason there would be more bidders whilst in admin. SISU allegedly would have been in and this American with Dawkins (if he’s real)

I assume Ashley has bid a significant sum if they think that’s the best offer
 

Nick

Administrator
But it stands to reason there would be more bidders whilst in admin. SISU allegedly would have been in and this American with Dawkins (if he’s real)

I assume Ashley has bid a significant sum if they think that’s the best offer

So where is the significant sum going if the debts aren't being paid off?
 

Nick

Administrator
For the trustee to say there's not time to contact bondholders is quite a bold claim when bondholders have for weeks, if not months, been requesting the trustee does something as they watched their investment disappear.

Also looks as if people have been receiving letters saying "get in touch by" but the letters don't turn up until after the date.

It's all very dodgy.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
But it stands to reason there would be more bidders whilst in admin. SISU allegedly would have been in and this American with Dawkins (if he’s real)

I assume Ashley has bid a significant sum if they think that’s the best offer
Ashley must have offered a sum close to the realistic valuation of the businesses. There's a time factor to getting things done before these businesses run out of money.
Negotiating with one party (rather 4 or more ) means it isn't going to drag on - or pad out admin costs.
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
So where is the significant sum going if the debts aren't being paid off?
Not sure how it works but isn’t that down to the administrator, so much in the pound I assume, don’t think it’s just bond holders owed money. I think HMRC is one who I assume will get the lions share.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
So where is the significant sum going if the debts aren't being paid off?
Enough to pay off half the bonds would be a significant sum. Part of the problem the bondholders have in accepting a reduced pay back is that they believed the valuations in the accounts, which at the very least didn’t take any dilapidations costs in to account. I don’t think that they grasp that there aren’t all that many potential buyers.

I think liquidation is a real possibility if the administrators lose the case - not good for CCFC and not necessarily good for bondholders either.
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
I think liquidation is a real possibility if the administrators lose the case - not good for CCFC and not necessarily good for bondholders either.
So what would that mean for those owed money. There would be a stadium sat there up for grabs wouldn’t there, who would grab it.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
Enough to pay off half the bonds would be a significant sum. Part of the problem the bondholders have in accepting a reduced pay back is that they believed the valuations in the accounts, which at the very least didn’t take any dilapidations costs in to account. I don’t think that they grasp that there aren’t all that many potential buyers.

I think liquidation is a real possibility if the administrators lose the case - not good for CCFC and not necessarily good for bondholders either.
Red flag should have been when the Trustee asked them for money to pay for advertising the arena sale. Implication being there wasn't many interested in buying it.
 

Nick

Administrator
Red flag should have been when the Trustee asked them for money to pay for advertising the arena sale. Implication being there wasn't many interested in buying it.

Or that the trustees were amazing at communicating when they wanted something (changing the terms or trying to get more money) but then non existent when people were trying to find out how they can get their money.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
Still find it very hard to believe that there was an unawareness of what was going due to the "size" of the issue for the council.
You assume there is regular (if not daily) communication between Reeves and the most senior councillors.
Given the national and local media coverage of the Wasps/ Arena story it has to be an issue on which there is a lot of discussion within "the halls of power".
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I was re reading the Simon Jordan articles last night.
Bothers me those remarks around remodeling of completely moving and building another
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I just can’t believe Reeves thought £30m of funding would get past council. Fair enough it was a very early stage lightweight proposal by all accounts, but he must have known he’d have been laughed out the room. Duggins answers seemed to be very clear the council wouldn’t pump money in.

And all this apparently just to buy time for a proper bidder to come in. Just…what?? Who would pay £60m and not even get the arena? Whole things sounds off.
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
Only interested in the court result pal nothing else all this Reeves, Duggins, CCC pissing clap trap. Sit back and see what happens Wednesday, might do you good.
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
You aren't sitting back and seeing what happens though? You are replying to loads of posts saying "Who cares?"
Constant boring talk going on and on about Reeves this, Duggins that Jesus !! Bottom line.
Do you want “big” Mike to be successful in acquiring the stadium ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top