Was against the idea of Mike Ashley when it was a just a rumour he was interested in the CBS, but as it stands is he not the only alternative option to our current one if we want to be joined with our own ground and if he was interested in the football club?
(Genuine question btw, not rhetorical)
Surely that has to be a better situation than our current one?
But it wouldn't be joined. We would just share owners.
We need to accept that we are never going to own that arena.
What does a typical football club owning its stadium look like? A club owning it and operating it for the benefit of the club.
IF Ashley buys us, we would just be renting the stadium off of him and as he would own both, he would have free reign to charge us whatever rent he wanted. This is Mike Ashley. He isn't going to let us play there for free, even if he owned us. He isn't going to let us keep commercial revenue and all of that. This is Mike Ashley.
We need to be realistic about this.