Match Thread ⚽️ Coventry City vs Birmingham City Match Thread - Saturday 29th Apr (12 Viewers)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
harvey098
Well-Known Member
And that’s just from your wife’s account
Well tbh I think routinely threatening to fight people is also twattish behaviour too. If it was up to me than neither would be tolerated on here.
Not that I want to pull the “Raise your hand if you’ve ever been personally victimised by Regina George” card etc but you know full well that you target multiple posters off and on. I get that you think you’re doing a ‘bit’, but it’s a tedious and petty one, and it’s pretty obvious you know what you’re doing.
Nick
Administrator
But you decided to call me out for no reason and not that behaviour
Fuck off with the victim act.
Either stop with your shit or you're gone again. I don't care who has said what to you, you know full well what you're doing.
If threats of violence start showing up in every thread with the same tedious regularity as your act does, I’ll be sure to call it out as wellBut you decided to call me out for no reason and not that behaviour
mmttww
Well-Known Member
Nick
Administrator
On the subject of the match, I missed the first goal because of having to stand up to let some dickheads past who probably walked round the stadium looking for their seat about 3 times. Across every block directly through the rows waving their tickets about saying they can't find it. It was about 5 blocks away.
Then shit loads of people fucked off on half hour and came back on about 60 minutes.
Then shit loads of people fucked off on half hour and came back on about 60 minutes.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
It's also the fact that sometimes they just offer an opinion and get targeted because that opinion doesn't chime with the majority.
I dunno, I find it slightly difficult to say don't judge as we all do
but there are a fair few I'd have banned ahead of them, some of them are ones complaining about them too!
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Going against the majority who were Thornites back in the day was horrific.It's also the fact that sometimes they just offer an opinion and get targeted because that opinion doesn't chime with the majority.
I dunno, I find it slightly difficult to say don't judge as we all do
South West Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Not too unreasonable through Brum tinted lenses really. Not quite a career in punditry or analysis yet though.
He was nowhere near as bad as that Sunderland lad (who himself can be good value) who had a meltdown after the home win.
By far the best one I saw was the youngster from Stoke after our win at their place. He actually looked like he could make a career out of his stuff.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Could be worse, you could be accused of being Tim Fisher!
I do however think you can't call yourself a proper forum user until at least one person has PMd you offering to fight you!
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Anyway, this is when we're doing well on the pitch. Wait until next season, when we only win teice all season, and it turns out Seppala has a clause entitling her to all Premiership TV money...
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Most of the PMs I have had are to request vegan curry recipes, obviously, I need to up my game!
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
stop arguing.
The trolls ignoring BNC had a great defensive game!
The trolls ignoring BNC had a great defensive game!
HerneBayGaz
Well-Known Member
MOM for me
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
He is a donkey some said...
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He had a better game - frankly wasn’t great in the first half positionally and also against a team with nothing to play for.
would you want him in a Wembley final - I’d be concerned
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Praise indeed
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
He defended well all game long.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately we're unlikely to benefit from his development here. The perennial issue with using loan players, (unless we get him back next season of course).
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
If we got to said final he’d have played in both legs of the semi
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Regardless he isn't a donkey and clueless like some idiots said
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Agree, but he was very raw, that's why he got sent here! Just a shame he's going to have to go back just as he's starting to settle in to the role.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
in my opinion in the first half he didn’t - he was easily beaten on a couple of occasions with crosses against a team that generally threatened little. It’s also strange his apparent lake of pace going forward - I suspect we are stuck with him now anyway as I doubt esbrand will return looking at Bidwells performance. He had big threats and dealt easily as well as getting into attacking positions . I would rather a right footed Esbrand as he looks more disciplined and capable
Grendel
Well-Known Member
he’s not very good however you try and spin it
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Bidwell was excellent yesterday, arguably MOTM.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Same for a few of them really, Doyle especially who looked a bit lost at times mid season.
Problem with loans innit, then we get similar next season, so start slowly as they bed in, the pressure increases...
Where you need a level headed chairman like Tim Fisher to not pull the trigger on the manager.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Jake '3rd striker' Bidwell!
Couldn't believe him popping up with those two chances towards the end, arguably should have done better with the second one.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Got a bit excited after his first effort I think
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Kept hitting it with outside of his foot