Huw edwards (16 Viewers)

[Deleted member 5849]

Tbf and I can't stand nonces, but from reading it someone sent them to him. How is that his fault? As long as he deleted it and didn't forward, surely they should go after whoever sent it to him however much lower profile they are.

I imagine it's the lack of deleting that's the issue!

 

---

[Deleted member 5849]

Years ago we had someone at work done for similar. First we knew was when a couple of my work colleagues got letters from him in prison! It did however explain why they took all the PCs away one day for 'virus software updates' when it was our job to do said updates!

Anyway he claimed it was his first tiime and he regretted it, he'd just surfed onto the wrong web page and then left and to begin with you thought well maybe unlucky but... I'm sure if it really was as he said, then anybody would have worked that out.

You don't go to prison for clicking on the wrong thing and hurrying away, do you. It's more repeatedly doing so and downloading the images.

 

[Otis]

Years ago we had someone at work done for similar. First we knew was when a couple of my work colleagues got letters from him in prison! It did however explain why they took all the PCs away one day for 'virus software updates' when it was our job to do said updates!

Anyway he claimed it was his first tiime and he regretted it, he'd just surfed onto the wrong web page and then left and to begin with you thought well maybe unlucky but... I'm sure if it really was as he said, then anybody would have worked that out.

You don't go to prison for clicking on the wrong thing and hurrying away, do you. It's more repeatedly doing so and downloading the images.

That's the thing.

He obviously didn't delete them and DID keep opening them

Otherwise there just wouldn't be this charge.

If they had been marked as unread it would be a different situation entirely

 

[shmmeee]

Years ago we had someone at work done for similar. First we knew was when a couple of my work colleagues got letters from him in prison! It did however explain why they took all the PCs away one day for 'virus software updates' when it was our job to do said updates!

Anyway he claimed it was his first tiime and he regretted it, he'd just surfed onto the wrong web page and then left and to begin with you thought well maybe unlucky but... I'm sure if it really was as he said, then anybody would have worked that out.

You don't go to prison for clicking on the wrong thing and hurrying away, do you. It's more repeatedly doing so and downloading the images.

Not sure if much different now. But during my degree I was taught many many ways to get images into someone’s device with no way of them knowing.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Huw Edwards pleads guilty to making indecent images of children

The former BBC newsreader will be sentenced in September after pleading guilty to three charges.

www.bbc.com

Pleading guilty may mean no custodial sentence
In fact I’d say it’s likely

 

[Sick Boy]

Tbf and I can't stand nonces, but from reading it someone sent them to him. How is that his fault? As long as he deleted it and didn't forward, surely they should go after whoever sent it to him however much lower profile they are.

They continued sending each other pictures after that.

 

[SkyBlueMatt]

Huw Edwards pleads guilty to making indecent images of children

The former BBC newsreader will be sentenced in September after pleading guilty to three charges.

www.bbc.com

Pleading guilty may mean no custodial sentence
In fact I’d say it’s likely

The Crown Prosecution Service said most of the category A images were estimated to show children aged between 13 and 15. Two clips showed a child aged about seven to nine.

He's going to jail. Hopefully for a long time.

 

[Sick Boy]

He's going to jail. Hopefully for a long time.

Doubt it; will probably be a suspended sentence.

 

[TomRad85]

Blokes got 5 kids. Gotta feel for them, can't be many things worse than finding out your old man is a raging nonce.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

 

[Sick Boy]

I’d imagine he got caught because the person sending them probably did before him.

 

[fatso]

Blokes got 5 kids. Gotta feel for them, can't be many things worse than finding out your old man is a raging nonce.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

I'm sure there's worse ways of finding out your old man's a sex case!

 

[Razzle Dazzle Dean Gordon]

Tbf and I can't stand nonces, but from reading it someone sent them to him. How is that his fault? As long as he deleted it and didn't forward, surely they should go after whoever sent it to him however much lower profile they are.

Having been sent some frankly fucking disgusting stuff he kept up his correspondence with the person and it would appear did absolutely nothing to report that person either. I get what you are saying but there's clearly enough to show that he was not exactly hostile to seeking out and receiving that kind of stuff.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

How the hell has the bloke sending him the images, who also happened to be a convicted paedophile, only got a suspended sentence?!?

 

[Sick Boy]

How the hell has the bloke sending him the images, who also happened to be a convicted paedophile, only got a suspended sentence?!?

Ridiculous. I expect Edwards will get the same if not worse.

 

[Otis]

Ridiculous. I expect Edwards will get the same if not worse.

Surely the other guy is worse. He was the one distributing the photos.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Surely the other guy is worse. He was the one distributing the photos.

I would have thought so too

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Surely the other guy is worse. He was the one distributing the photos.

And has a track record!

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Huw Edwards pleads guilty to making indecent images of children

The former BBC newsreader will be sentenced in September after pleading guilty to three charges.

www.bbc.com

Pleading guilty may mean no custodial sentence
In fact I’d say it’s likely

I’m sorry it’s just the sentencing laws
And not condoning his criminal behaviour at all just saying

 

[Flying Fokker]

Huw Edwards pleads guilty to making indecent images of children

The former BBC newsreader will be sentenced in September after pleading guilty to three charges.

www.bbc.com

Pleading guilty may mean no custodial sentence
In fact I’d say it’s likely

He’s in for a rough time. If he’s out he’ll become a reclise and suicide candidate . If he’s in prison he will be very risk for both suicide and a battering anyway.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

He’s in for a rough time. If he’s out he’ll become a reclise and suicide candidate . If he’s in prison he will be very risk for both suicide and a battering anyway.

Most persons convicted off a sexual offence serve their time in a prison solely of sex offenders

 

[Nick]

How the hell has the bloke sending him the images, who also happened to be a convicted paedophile, only got a suspended sentence?!?

Really? Fucking madness. Especially if he had already been convicted of it.

 

[Sick Boy]

Surely the other guy is worse. He was the one distributing the photos.

I agree but he’s higher profile.

 

[shmmeee]

Been this way forever, as I say it was a topic on conversation in my CS degree in 2002, but as a techie this law really doesn’t sit right with me. I could make you all criminals with one DM on here. No defence of Edward’s who was clearly happy receiving “barely legal” stuff even if you take his defence as gospel, which you shouldn’t.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

Been this way forever, as I say it was a topic on conversation in my CS degree in 2002, but as a techie this law really doesn’t sit right with me. I could make you all criminals with one DM on here. No defence of Edward’s who was clearly happy receiving “barely legal” stuff even if you take his defence as gospel, which you shouldn’t.

View attachment 37309

I'd hope that automatic deletion and not soliciting more would be sufficient mind you! As you say there's clearly a difference.

 

[Sick Boy]

Been this way forever, as I say it was a topic on conversation in my CS degree in 2002, but as a techie this law really doesn’t sit right with me. I could make you all criminals with one DM on here. No defence of Edward’s who was clearly happy receiving “barely legal” stuff even if you take his defence as gospel, which you shouldn’t.

View attachment 37309

You’d like to think they’d be a fair bit of pragmatism around that.

 

[shmmeee]

You’d like to think they’d be a fair bit of pragmatism around that.

Yeah you’d hope so

 

[JAM See]

Been this way forever, as I say it was a topic on conversation in my CS degree in 2002, but as a techie this law really doesn’t sit right with me. I could make you all criminals with one DM on here. No defence of Edward’s who was clearly happy receiving “barely legal” stuff even if you take his defence as gospel, which you shouldn’t.

View attachment 37309

But surely, any right minded person would immediately reply saying that's inappropriate, and also forward immediately to the police?

I do get some silly stuff over social media, but anything as distressing as child porn would have me straight onto the authorities.

I suspect the wording is such that it can exclude wankers like that loophole lawyer when it comes to parking tickets and speeding fines.

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

He’s in for a rough time. If he’s out he’ll become a reclise and suicide candidate . If he’s in prison he will be very risk for both suicide and a battering anyway.

Hopefully they both do the decent thing.

 

[skybluetony176]

He's going to jail. Hopefully for a long time.

Only if the judge makes an example out him. Typically he’d have got more if he climbed a gantry on the M25 to protest about climate change.

 

[Grendel]

Only if the judge makes an example out him. Typically he’d have got more if he climbed a gantry on the M25 to protest about climate change.

How do you think we will do against Stoke?

 

[Liquid Gold]

I'm absolutely baffled by the notion that this wouldn't result in a custodial.

 

[shmmeee]

I'm absolutely baffled by the notion that this wouldn't result in a custodial.

These days mate, you say you’re Rwandan, they let you out of jail.

 

[Deleted member 5849]

These days mate, you say you’re Rwandan, they let you out of jail.

Please God, it's bad enough in one thread!

 

[shmmeee]

Oh fuck got my threads mixed up. Sorry.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

I'm absolutely baffled by the notion that this wouldn't result in a custodial.

If you go on some of the addiction web sites you’d get an idea of the level of activity
Rumours of 350000 to 750000 where do you expect them to be housed?
it’s an epedemic
Most people convicted the biggest loss is their careers family and friends rather than prison