Transfer Rumour January transfer window (222 Viewers)

Domo

Well-Known Member
So attacking wise we have

Bassette who can’t score
Simms who is immobile
Sakamoto who apparently is a one trick pony
And Raphael who’s unproven

until EMC and Wright are back in feb, with no plans to get in any other forwards
the hound will score he just has to be fed with decent balls.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Surely if there's an offer on the table for BTA King goes to Lampard for a yes or no.

If he thinks he's not up to it and isn't going to play a part cut your losses, if Lampard thinks he has more to offer and is needed then you keep him.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
stil think we should keep him.
We need squad players. You can't just go here's a decent first XI and hope you can play the same XI week in week out.

In an ideal world you'd like 2 players you consider genuine first teamers for every position but not sure many clubs can afford that luxury and even if they can you've then got to try and keep your squad players happy.
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
We need squad players. You can't just go here's a decent first XI and hope you can play the same XI week in week out.

In an ideal world you'd like 2 players you consider genuine first teamers for every position but not sure many clubs can afford that luxury and even if they can you've then got to try and keep your squad players happy.
Agreed but we play with one striker and ideally a 10 but we don’t have a 10 so BTA runs around a lot.

You could sell BTA, retain wright, simms and Bassette for that single striker role and use some of the money to loan in a 10.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
I'm open to BTA leaving to be honest, but on the basis we can bring in someone to replace him, I'd be looking at Ricky Jade Jones at Posh as a potential option.

11 goals in 32 games from LW, but there is a lot of interest in the lad so not sure if doable.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
Yes, because there’s evidence to suggest that’s been happening all along. It’s embarrassing the way some spout their anti DK agenda. He may have made mistakes but he clearly has been reinvesting the fees received from transfers.
Nobody has had a go at not reinvestment of funds received. It is how the funds have been reinvested. If you're after proof look at how most seem happy if we made a loss on a player we recently signed.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
Be an absolute pisstake if Asante and lati go and we only bring a loan in, we need a cm, rw and a cb/rb minimum
Bring in the funds, bring in loans to get us to the end of the season then rebuild during the closed season. Let Lampard put a squad together where all positions are covered with capable players.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
And of course you definitively know that there were no attempts to fill this position.
Well why didn’t we get it over the line? Plenty of other clubs don’t have problems with that, if we couldn’t fill the position as poor as palmer was, we needed someone like that
 

samccov1987

Well-Known Member
I'm told if they both go, that should give us the funds to PURCHASE the Chelsea CM.

Burroughs is being looked at as the Milan stand in until end of season, depending Lampards view

Shifting on then Tavares and Collins will mean we have funds to buy another player also
When’s lati’s move being announced? Thought we might have heard by now especially as he didn’t play Saturday.
 

Domo

Well-Known Member
I'm told if they both go, that should give us the funds to PURCHASE the Chelsea CM.

Burroughs is being looked at as the Milan stand in until end of season, depending Lampards view

Shifting on then Tavares and Collins will mean we have funds to buy another player also
Lati has versatility tho, BTA , tavares and colins can go.

who is the chelsea CM? Enzo? 😂
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
I'm told if they both go, that should give us the funds to PURCHASE the Chelsea CM.

Burroughs is being looked at as the Milan stand in until end of season, depending Lampards view

Shifting on then Tavares and Collins will mean we have funds to buy another player also
Wait what? Would they be open to selling him?

Seems a very good player for the future but seems mad they would sell?

Also based on that loan article on the two Chelsea loans maybe BYA is further along as why else would we enquire about a ST
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
I'm told if they both go, that should give us the funds to PURCHASE the Chelsea CM.

Burroughs is being looked at as the Milan stand in until end of season, depending Lampards view

Shifting on then Tavares and Collins will mean we have funds to buy another player also
And would fit into bringing our own players on instead of for other clubs. Would expect a big clause being included though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top