Player Ratings vs Crewe (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter Jonny
- Start date
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
murphy 7
christie 7
adams 6
wood 7
edge 6
jennings 5
moussa 5
baker 6
mcsheffrey 6
clarke 5
elliott 7
dunn - 0 - i kid you not
ball - 5
bailey - 6
overall 6/10 - cant score cant defend,cant get any luck
christie 7
adams 6
wood 7
edge 6
jennings 5
moussa 5
baker 6
mcsheffrey 6
clarke 5
elliott 7
dunn - 0 - i kid you not
ball - 5
bailey - 6
overall 6/10 - cant score cant defend,cant get any luck
mark82
Super Moderator
I thought Moussa was poor. How on earth have you given him an 8?
Disagree. He looked a threat. Faded at the end though and maybe should have been taken off.
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
moussa was shit
1nilandwe...
Well-Known Member
Murphy - 7 - Not much to do really first half
Christie - 8 - Went past his man every time he went forward. Solid enough defensively. Best performance from him for ages.
Adams - 7 - Similar to Christie but tried to do too much at times. Some poor final balls.
Wood - 6 - Comfortable for long periods, exposed for the goals
Edge - 6 - See above. Won everything in the air for long periods.
Jennings - 7 - Kept things ticking. Does a good job quietly.
Moussa - 6 - Gave the ball away too often when it really mattered, still looks a threat running at defenders
Baker - 8 - Linked with Christie well. Beat his man often. Deserved more reward for his performance
McSheffrey - 8 - Took a while to get into it but looked our most threatening player second half.
Clarke - 5 - Poorest I've seen him. Poor ball control. Not in the game enough. Marked out of it.
Elliott - 7 - Impressive. Held the ball up well. Battled hard. Should have scored. Didn't.
Dunn - ? - Sat in the North stand. Difficult to judge how he did for the goals. Didn't look particularly confident
Ball - 5 - Didn't look match fit to me
Bailey - ? Not long enough to judge.
Overall, we played some really good stuff at times. Probably the most one-sided 0-3 I've ever seen. Gutted.
Christie - 8 - Went past his man every time he went forward. Solid enough defensively. Best performance from him for ages.
Adams - 7 - Similar to Christie but tried to do too much at times. Some poor final balls.
Wood - 6 - Comfortable for long periods, exposed for the goals
Edge - 6 - See above. Won everything in the air for long periods.
Jennings - 7 - Kept things ticking. Does a good job quietly.
Moussa - 6 - Gave the ball away too often when it really mattered, still looks a threat running at defenders
Baker - 8 - Linked with Christie well. Beat his man often. Deserved more reward for his performance
McSheffrey - 8 - Took a while to get into it but looked our most threatening player second half.
Clarke - 5 - Poorest I've seen him. Poor ball control. Not in the game enough. Marked out of it.
Elliott - 7 - Impressive. Held the ball up well. Battled hard. Should have scored. Didn't.
Dunn - ? - Sat in the North stand. Difficult to judge how he did for the goals. Didn't look particularly confident
Ball - 5 - Didn't look match fit to me
Bailey - ? Not long enough to judge.
Overall, we played some really good stuff at times. Probably the most one-sided 0-3 I've ever seen. Gutted.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Moussa 6 Clarke 7 can't believe people watch the same game! Bailey needed to be on before ball. Thought Clarke and Elliott linked well. Edge, wood and Christie poor defensively. Baker our mom. Dunn looked poor shot stopper. Thought Clarke did well. Needed extra man in midfield
Jackoskyblue
Well-Known Member
Callum Ball is a disgrace of a footballer how does he justify being paid someone tell me what he brings to the table, he can't head, he has no physical presence, no first touch, can't finish, has zero pace.
CCFC_Charlie
Well-Known Member
Murphy - 6
Christie - 7
Wood - 5
Edjenguele - 4
Adams - 5
Baker - 7
Moussa - 6
Jennings - 7
McSheffrey - 7
Clarke - 5
Eliott - 6
Dunn - 1
Ball - 4
Bailey - 6
Christie - 7
Wood - 5
Edjenguele - 4
Adams - 5
Baker - 7
Moussa - 6
Jennings - 7
McSheffrey - 7
Clarke - 5
Eliott - 6
Dunn - 1
Ball - 4
Bailey - 6
Speng
Well-Known Member
I agree apart from mac (4)
CCFC_Charlie
Well-Known Member
He plays in defense, we conceded three goals, thus he didn't do his job. He did nothing for the first two goals.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Agree what did you think of Clarke?
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Did you not think he was dangerous?
Nick
Administrator
Did he have any shots on target or assists? If none then no!
Otis
Well-Known Member
Would have given Clarke a 6.
Thought he looked sluggish, but at the same time he did give their defenders a bit of a torrid time.
2 most dangerous players were Baker and McSheff without any shadow of a doubt.
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
He only has to step on the pitch and stupor calls him dangerous and threatening
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
We played really well for 75 mins should have been 4-1 up by then
The last 15 were a shambles, you could see going into the last 15 they were desperate to win still an started making mistakes, we went to gung ho in the last 15 mins. The players forgot there was a second leg. 0-1 would have gave us a chance in the second leg
The last 15 were a shambles, you could see going into the last 15 they were desperate to win still an started making mistakes, we went to gung ho in the last 15 mins. The players forgot there was a second leg. 0-1 would have gave us a chance in the second leg
Sky Blue Sheepy
New Member
Whenever he had the ball McSheffrey beat his man and got crosses in. Our best player imo. Moussa was good until it mattered - careless with the ball and got needlessly tackled just like Friday. Dunn did well with pass backs; that's the nicest thing I can find to say. Edj didn't win a single header and was at fault for at least 2 of the goals. Baker wasn't at his best but still looked good for the most part.
Cannot be arsed to give numbers.
Cannot be arsed to give numbers.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Your not allowed to say that.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Would agree with nearly all that, apart from Edge, who did win some headers I thought and wasn't that bad.
For me the weak link at the back is Richard Wood. He didn't play at all badly today, but he lacks agility and has little pace. Opposition players know they can run at him and beat him for pace again and again.
Nick
Administrator
You can. How many crosses found a player?
What about when he could square it but shoots? Every game he has a greedy spell and shoots when he could pass.
He did play 1 great ball in the first half though.
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
I think it means he nearly creates something but always finds a way to cock it up at the most important part
stupot07
Well-Known Member
I didn't count them, but probably more than baker did.
Nick
Administrator
Baker hit the post...