PWKH bares his teeth. (23 Viewers)

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
I've noticed it seems OK as long as you and yours are doing the spitting.

People come on here - who's idea of achievement will be to get their homework done before half-term's over - and spit a vitriolic, worthless diatribe out and it's an embarrassment. Nothing more or less.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Perceived in the press? We're already a national joke because or our tosser owners.

Oh yeah and it's great when a so called fan gets in the CT Limelight and decides whe will have a pop as well is it??
 

CCFCDan87

New Member
Oh yeah and it's great when a so called fan gets in the CT Limelight and decides whe will have a pop as well is it??

What he is doing is telling us the FANS what's happening. Unlike SISU who just sit back and wreck our club. Why can't you see that?
 

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
he keeps going on about being totally separate organisations - ACL and higgs trust

its just he is the common link

sorry - i am bored with him
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Oh yeah and it's great when a so called fan gets in the CT Limelight and decides whe will have a pop as well is it??

SISU are in receipt of a grant for half a million pounds, not their money, but a grant - and they can't hand over some 2 percent of this value to a charity so that their academy can be held at arm's length from this dispute: and you think it's this bloke's interview that's bringing the club into disrepute?

If your view wasn't so perverse, it'd be funny
 
Last edited:

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
What he is doing is telling us the FANS what's happening. Unlike SISU who just sit back and wreck our club. Why can't you see that?

No need to put "FANS" in higher case I can spell the word.

Did I say once that SISU haven't wrecked our club? No.

It's also funny how you respond to this comment yet the one I replied to your comment against earlier had no response...

Funny that.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
SISU are in receipt of a grant for half a million pounds, not their money, but a grant - and they can't hand over some 2 percent of this value to a charity so that their academy can be held at arm's length from this dispute: and you think it's this bloke's interview that's bringing the club into disrepute?

If your view wasn't so perverse, it'd be funny

What I have said previously is that I think this interview in the CT has been in parts based on PWKH and solely his opinion of himself at expense of the club and I am sick of it..
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
he is not telling the fans what is happening - he is putting across his own agenda - big difference

Surely he wouldn't have an agenda if the bills had been paid? He's maybe justifiably upset the club have a huge grant to run an academy and are seemingly unwilling or unable to give across a slither for it's intended purpose?
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
What I have said previously is that I think this interview in the CT has been in parts based on PWKH and solely his opinion of himself at expense of the club and I am sick of it..

So he should keep quiet and let SISU do what they want with the academy grant? He represents a charity. Isn't there a genuine public interest in him speaking out?
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Surely he wouldn't have an agenda if the bills had been paid? He's maybe justifiably upset the club have a huge grant to run an academy and are seemingly unwilling or unable to give across a slither for it's intended purpose?

“People have accused me of wrecking it and so on,”
“It was my initiative to build the centre and no-one would be keener to see the Academy back there with proper arrangements in place. I built the bloody thing – it was my idea."
“I spent a year persuading people that it would be a good thing to do and then did the whole of the build. I have put sweat and blood into it so of course I want to see the Academy there."
“It’s a thankless task sometimes and I resent it, to a certain extent, when people say all we’re trying to do is kill the Academy."


What part of that doesn't like he has his own agenda?
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
“People have accused me of wrecking it and so on,”
“It was my initiative to build the centre and no-one would be keener to see the Academy back there with proper arrangements in place. I built the bloody thing – it was my idea."
“I spent a year persuading people that it would be a good thing to do and then did the whole of the build. I have put sweat and blood into it so of course I want to see the Academy there."
“It’s a thankless task sometimes and I resent it, to a certain extent, when people say all we’re trying to do is kill the Academy."


What part of that doesn't like he has his own agenda?

Read my words again. I didn't say he didn't have an agenda. I stated it wouldn't be relevant or am issue if the bills had been paid.

He's upset. Rightly so. Rightly so as the academy are being messed about for no good reason. That's why his points are so emotive.

Still, no unpaid bills: no emotion
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
So he should keep quiet and let SISU do what they want with the academy grant? He represents a charity. Isn't there a genuine public interest in him speaking out?

I have answered this already, what PWKH could have done instead of jumping in front of the CT and spouting his opinion, is kept it quiet from the media and gone to CCFC (SISU) and said "This money needs to be paid as its owed to the centre and the charity, we give you till the end of the month". Its not like that this would have been hard to do surely in his place of authority PWKH could have pushed this through the right channels to get this money or even discussed this with other people, not jump on the CT and tell them "Well I built this from ground up", "It was my idea", "I persuaded people for a year" and so on!!

That's just trying to boost your own reputation when you have the 15 minutes of fame...
 

PWKH

New Member
I have answered this already, what PWKH could have done instead of jumping in front of the CT and spouting his opinion, is kept it quiet from the media and gone to CCFC (SISU) and said "This money needs to be paid as its owed to the centre and the charity, we give you till the end of the month". Its not like that this would have been hard to do surely in his place of authority PWKH could have pushed this through the right channels to get this money or even discussed this with other people, not jump on the CT and tell them "Well I built this from ground up", "It was my idea", "I persuaded people for a year" and so on!!

That's just trying to boost your own reputation when you have the 15 minutes of fame...

Did that, got nowhere. If what you call 15 minutes of fame, and it doesn't much feel that, gets the Academy back into the Higgs Centre with Sisu paying their bills the result will be worth it. I assume nobody on here wants to risk the closure of the Academy.
The fact that they have not paid is not an opinion it is a fact.
 
Just a short note to say that there is nothing "in it for me" as was suggested earlier. I am Chairman of Trustees of the Alan Higgs Centre. The Higgs Charity spent £10m building the Centre and gave it to the Trustees of the Centre. The Club's Academy pays a discounted rate for its bookings. The charges are made by Coventry Sports Foundation to the Trust. The Trust then collects that money from the Club and passes it on to CSF. None of the Trustees are paid nor do they get any expenses, nothing. Both the Alan Higgs Centre Trust and Coventry Sports Foundation are registered charities: they are not commercial bodies. CSF have to make the Centre pay but are not out to make profits for owners.
The Alan Higgs Centre Trust and the Higgs Charity are completely separate bodies with different Trustees.

All I can say is I live very near to the AHC and try getting a pitch booked is impossible unless you want it at 9.30 at night...god forbid you ask for a grass pitch, it is ALWAYS booked by the club, if the center opened it up a little more to the community maybe you would not need to rely on the halfwits running the academy. I have ran 3 LOCAL (within 1 mile of the AHC) kids/youth football teams, and we could not get to use the facilities because of the academy...the academy that has a scouting network that does not work, again I know boys who are with Blues, Foxes, WBA, Villa, Burton, that travel from Coventry to train with these academies...I have in 8 years never seen a Coventry Scout at any youth games - when I asked a Cov scout about this he told me that if they are good enough they will get noticed :thinking about: the amount of boys in our catchment area? and look what we have brought through to the first team?:claping hands: rant over!!
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
David Buust told me and a group of mates to "F*ck Off" there once, when we were playing on a pitch we had booked and paid for.
We ended up playing indoors and got half of our money back. Should have broke his other leg.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
The comments on the Cov Telegraph web site are mostly blaming the owners.. and rightly so in my opinion, they seem to be playing a nasty tactical game here, trying to rewrite the rules in their favour by refusing not only to honour contracts but not even to negotiate in good faith.. it is pretty despicable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Read my words again. I didn't say he didn't have an agenda. I stated it wouldn't be relevant or am issue if the bills had been paid.

He's upset. Rightly so. Rightly so as the academy are being messed about for no good reason. That's why his points are so emotive.

Still, no unpaid bills: no emotion

So if he is upset go straight to CCFC?? Why take the route to go through CT to then go to CCFC, what does it gain?? It could be all settled with a simple explanation, but it doesn't sound like this option was ever given a chance..
 

Nick

Administrator
I don't know the full story but surely they would have been chasing CCFC to sort it in the first instance rather than going straight to the press?
 
S

skyblue2k

Guest
In all honesty the Higgs trust should not be taking any blame in this whatsoever, the trust was set up to help people in Coventry and in the past loaned money to CCFC to keep them alive. We have to remember that our previous owners sold our half share to the Higgs charity with i believe £4.5 million being paid to the club and a £2 million loan being written off. For this they have a half share in ACL and the lease of the Ricoh Arena, for which they have not made any profits or had any payments. So you could say they have £6.5 million tied up earning no interest or available for them to use.

For a year now CCFC have paid no rent for the Ricoh, ok ACL have taken the money from the escrow account and match day costs. But at the end of the day CCFC and Sisu, had a lot of years to renegotiate the rent and did nothing about it.

It now turns out the lease for using the Higgs centre was with CCFC Limited and has not been paid as this company is now in Admin. So it was down to CCFCH to sort this mess out but it was ignored and as the total debt was now £14k the academy is now suffering.

Yesterday morning Peter Knatchbull-Hugessen, chairman of the Alan Higgs Trust, was angrily insisting that there had been no communication and that the Sky Blues were refusing to respond to his letter, but he and the other Higgs trustees received an e-mail addressing some of the issues yesterday afternoon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

hill83

Well-Known Member
So if he is upset go straight to CCFC?? Why take the route to go through CT to then go to CCFC, what does it gain?? It could be all settled with a simple explanation, but it doesn't sound like this option was ever given a chance..



I'm taking a wild stab in the dark here, but I'm pretty certain that he probably already did go directly to Sisu long before he went to the Telegraph.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
I don't know the full story but surely they would have been chasing CCFC to sort it in the first instance rather than going straight to the press?

Read above from the man himself. He says 'did that. Got nowhere.'

So what next? More solicitors letters? High Court yet again?

No. They should be damn embarrassed via the press. This is a minute sum and a fraction of a grant they have received.

There is absolutely no justification for the Academy being dragged into this sorry mess for such a paltry value, and for which someone else has already offered grant sum. None whatsoever
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Did that, got nowhere. If what you call 15 minutes of fame, and it doesn't much feel that, gets the Academy back into the Higgs Centre with Sisu paying their bills the result will be worth it. I assume nobody on here wants to risk the closure of the Academy.
The fact that they have not paid is not an opinion it is a fact.

And I bet if I asked you to prove that you would say it's confidential??

We all want the academy in the best facilities possible as does every fan so I understand whatever it takes and not against it, but I am sure that this could have been resolved without taking it to the CT and publishing an article where all the four lines aren't about the academy, but about yourself!!! That's not thinking of the academy is it??

I am not saying its anything less than fact, but it begs the question does anyone in Coventry know how to sit around a table and discuss things like adults??
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
So if he is upset go straight to CCFC?? Why take the route to go through CT to then go to CCFC, what does it gain?? It could be all settled with a simple explanation, but it doesn't sound like this option was ever given a chance..

What part of 'Did that, got nowhere' don't you understand?

I think you should reread the CT article again before making more of your ill-informed opinions: http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/coventry-city-fc/coventry-city-fc-news/2013/04/09/sky-blues-look-to-sort-out-academy-mess-92746-33141682/
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
I don't know the full story but surely they would have been chasing CCFC to sort it in the first instance rather than going straight to the press?

Its been posted in here, ACL wrote to CCFC & CCFC(H) about it last Wednesday.
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/29306-The-Academy?p=416132&viewfull=1#post416132

AshbyJan got some more feedback
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/29306-The-Academy?p=416250&viewfull=1#post416250

Is this stalling or an attempt to let someone else shoulder the costs?

Can the trust ask what the grant money has or is being used for, it shouldn't be used so other costs, the club should be able to justify expenditure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
I'm taking a wild stab in the dark here, but I'm pretty certain that he probably already did go directly to Sisu long before he went to the Telegraph.

I for one hope so Hill83, I really do and we all know that SISU's negotiating skills behind closed doors are not great, but being in a business industry myself if I was playing hardball and looking for an immeadiate response I would go with something that just adds to the pressure of which there is already many and there is nothing in Football more pressure demanding than the public eye. I hope PWKH did as he says, but I don't trust either side at the moment and maybe that's clouding my opinion of this mess...
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Ever think that after 5 years dealing with SISU that PWKH is feeling just a little frustrated by the whole situation. He deals with SISU every day, I am finding it hard not to sympathise

The reason the academy has to pay its discounted rate in advance is that on several ....... not just once..... occassions in the past the club has failed to pay its hire chharges and contractual agreements. On at least one occassion that has meant the academy has been locked out of the centre until the bill paid. Other occassions the bill has been paid late because the club "couldnt find the papework". Problems with the academy not paying bills is not something new...... and any organisation takes payment record in to account. But the charity and centre are portrayed in the media as the bad guys in this

The reason they couldnt use it recently was that there was no valid contract for CCFCHoldings to use the centre....... the company holding the contract CCFC Ltd no longer traded, no longer had money to pay the bill. The one thing we should have all learnt is that it is necessary to have a valid water tight contract with anything concerning SISU....... they can not just please themselves, they simply had no contract to use the Alan Higgs Centre, paying the old one still gives CCFCH no rights to use it legally. So despite the implication from the CT you have to ask who's fault is it?

So whilst some may disagree with PWKH's out burst it is i feel understandable. he has done it once in 5 (for everyone) very frustrating years :facepalm:
 
Last edited:

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member

LarryGrayson

New Member

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
I would guess that it was the CT chasing PWKH for comment rather than the other way round Robo.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top