Sisu and the £1m? (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

ecky

Well-Known Member
Correct me if I am wrong but if my maths are correct with the proceeds from the FA cup game at Arsenal and the sale of Clarke sisu have pocketed around £1m pound?
Mansett has left and Clarke has gone and their wages must offset the loanees, so what will happen to the £1m?
Thoughts are most welcome?
 

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member
Good, they can keep it. They want considerable recompense for their "losses" don't they? Well hopefully in a very small way this has brought forward the day when they either fuck off or "under sell."
 

ecky

Well-Known Member
Fisher said they had those costs covered for the next 3 years didn't he?
This money could see us back at Ricoh for the next 3-4 years instead of that dump in Northampton where they can't hold a football match and where we will find ourselves having to play 4 games in 2 weeks soon!
More rain forecast next week so the pitch at Sixfields won't improve
 
How much do you think it costs to run the club, week to week?

Substantially more than they are taking in at Shitfields. And you still persist in Idolising these cretins. Cretins who stole our club and absconded to foreign lands. Cretins that you hero worship. Cretins that seem to have an affinity to others of subnormal intelligence and who come on here and other sites and spout utter crap.

Rant over for now:blue::blue::blue::blue::claping hands:
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Genuinely couldn't give a shit. As much as I can't stand the fuckers they are paying to keep the club running, so i doubt it's gone into their back pocket.
 

Rusty Trombone

Well-Known Member
Genuinely couldn't give a shit. As much as I can't stand the fuckers they are paying to keep the club running, so i doubt it's gone into their back pocket.

A bit like if someone was taken hostage and those responsible keep paying for food for the hostage, they are keeping the person running. Then if they find some extra money (here's the Arsenal analogy for those keeping up), they might loan a dvd, maybe The Bridge box set, or maybe Uncle Buck, depends how old the hostage is.

I'll get my coat.
 

ExmouthNeil

Well-Known Member
Correct me if I am wrong but if my maths are correct with the proceeds from the FA cup game at Arsenal and the sale of Clarke sisu have pocketed around £1m pound?
Mansett has left and Clarke has gone and their wages must offset the loanees, so what will happen to the £1m?
Thoughts are most welcome?


Here we go again................:slap::slap::slap:
 
So they not exactly bank rolling the club are they if they use the money to fund the club , it is self generated income keeping us a live NOT SISU s cheque book !!
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
As we're already making losses they it will be used to fund losses and bring in the loan players, and fee for Seabourne.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
Loan players aren't free. Normally a loan fee as well as % of premiership wages.
 

RPHunt

New Member
The money will go towards legal expenses incurred in sending threatening letters to fans groups, suing charities and requesting judicial reviews.

This is normal expenditure for a football club, is it not?
 

Danceswithhorses

Well-Known Member
Loan players aren't free. Normally a loan fee as well as % of premiership wages.
Nonsense - any costs are at the discretion of the club that owns the player.
There could be no fee, and no wages to pay, depending on how generous the loaning club are.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
How much do you think it costs to run the club, week to week?

Nothing, their investors are paying. It's the beauty of a company like SISU. Joy takes risks for others not herself.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
So they not exactly bank rolling the club are they if they use the money to fund the club , it is self generated income keeping us a live NOT SISU s cheque book !!

Well yes, I doubt the Arsenal and Clarke money is covering the entire shambles. So I'd suggest they are bank rolling the club.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
To put it simply, they must be funding the club. There's no magic money paying the players and staff wages for a start, and they are making fuck all on ticket sales.
So how can anyone of sane mind say they aren't funding the club.
They are bellends, that we know, but to say they aren't funding the club is total lunacy.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
He can be forgiven, as a Lost fan also, he's probably still upset by the last episode as I am.

Purgatory type stuff working through their issues from life?

My fucking arse.

All the memories have just come flooding back. That last season and ending was a total clusterfuck. I loved that show.

Actually, I'm going to start it again now.
 
Last edited:

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
I heard it was all retconned so it was a daydream Bobby Ewing had in the shower, and it turned out he wasn't shot by Armin Tamzarian. I may be confusing Wikipedia articles.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
GyRZx.gif
 
Last edited:

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Nothing wrong with using the money to fund the clubs losses. However, it means that sisu aren't funding all the losses. Therefore that particular credit to sisu can't be given.

They can't have it both ways, wanting praise for funding the losses whilst using money generated from unexpected windfalls to fund it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top