A few questions for PWKH (12 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Ian1779

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Seeing as PWKH has turned up to clarify some points for us, would it be so wrong to ask him some questions I have about this saga? I have tried to read as much information as possible but some points just keep sticking in my head.

1. Is it true that ACL received an 'exit fee' from Isle of Capri to leave the Ricoh Arena complex? Is it true that ACL can distribute this fee into their yearly accounts as they wish to, and that this would have been done in the year relating to last set of accounts that were published (when CCFC were still at Ricoh arena)?

2. Is it true that ACL will ultimately receive the same amount of money from the CCFC Holdings/Ltd admin process whether they had accepted or rejected the CVA?

3. Is it true that ACL have not received this money yet, and is that because there has been a challenge to the liquidation of CCFC Holdings?

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
 
M

MichaelCCFC

New Member
Ian1779 said:
Seeing as PWKH has turned up to clarify some points for us, would it be so wrong to ask him some questions I have about this saga? I have tried to read as much information as possible but some points just keep sticking in my head.

1. Is it true that ACL received an 'exit fee' from Isle of Capri to leave the Ricoh Arena complex? Is it true that ACL can distribute this fee into their yearly accounts as they wish to, and that this would have been done in the year relating to last set of accounts that were published (when CCFC were still at Ricoh arena)?

2. Is it true that ACL will ultimately receive the same amount of money from the CCFC Holdings/Ltd admin process whether they had accepted or rejected the CVA?

3. Is it true that ACL have not received this money yet, and is that because there has been a challenge to the liquidation of CCFC Holdings?

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...


I'd add: can the last rental offer made via the FL be made public with full details and can it be confirmed whether or not that offer is still on the table?
 
chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
My understanding was that as a condition of issuing Otium the golden share they had to agree to pay ACL the same amount offered in the CVA. When last reported it hadn't been paid. I recall SISU stating this was due to delays in the liquidation process but it was never explained how that had an impact as the FL issued the condition to Otium.

Also not clear what, if any, penalty the club will receive if this doesn't happen and what the timeframe for payment is.
 
L

limoncello

Guest
chiefdave said:
My understanding was that as a condition of issuing Otium the golden share they had to agree to pay ACL the same amount offered in the CVA. When last reported it hadn't been paid. I recall SISU stating this was due to delays in the liquidation process but it was never explained how that had an impact as the FL issued the condition to Otium.

Also not clear what, if any, penalty the club will receive if this doesn't happen and what the timeframe for payment is.
Click to expand...

I think they were asking Peter.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Ian1779 said:
Seeing as PWKH has turned up to clarify some points for us, would it be so wrong to ask him some questions I have about this saga? I have tried to read as much information as possible but some points just keep sticking in my head.

1. Is it true that ACL received an 'exit fee' from Isle of Capri to leave the Ricoh Arena complex? Is it true that ACL can distribute this fee into their yearly accounts as they wish to, and that this would have been done in the year relating to last set of accounts that were published (when CCFC were still at Ricoh arena)?

2. Is it true that ACL will ultimately receive the same amount of money from the CCFC Holdings/Ltd admin process whether they had accepted or rejected the CVA?

3. Is it true that ACL have not received this money yet, and is that because there has been a challenge to the liquidation of CCFC Holdings?

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...

That's 6 questions :-/


PUSB
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Ian1779 said:
Seeing as PWKH has turned up to clarify some points for us, would it be so wrong to ask him some questions I have about this saga? I have tried to read as much information as possible but some points just keep sticking in my head.

1. Is it true that ACL received an 'exit fee' from Isle of Capri to leave the Ricoh Arena complex? Is it true that ACL can distribute this fee into their yearly accounts as they wish to, and that this would have been done in the year relating to last set of accounts that were published (when CCFC were still at Ricoh arena)?

2. Is it true that ACL will ultimately receive the same amount of money from the CCFC Holdings/Ltd admin process whether they had accepted or rejected the CVA?

3. Is it true that ACL have not received this money yet, and is that because there has been a challenge to the liquidation of CCFC Holdings?

Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...

In most the stuff I have read this sort of thing has not featured much.

Most people seem more focused on whether our football club has a financially viable plan going forward.

If PWKH says yes regarding the exit fee. That their rejection of the CVA was not about the money but that they felt the process was floored and that they have not received the money because the process has not been completed yet.

What significance would this have on things for us the everyday fans?

I ask because these to me these questions seem quite obscure questions and yet they are bothering you, so I am hoping there is a significance
 
Last edited:
lordsummerisle

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
dongonzalos said:
In most the stuff I have read this sort of thing has not featured much.

Most people seem more focused on whether our football club has a financially viable plan going forward.

If PWKH says yes regarding the exit fee. That their rejection of the CVA was not about the money but that they felt the process was floored and that they have not received the money because the process has not been completed yet.

What significance would this have on things for us the everyday fans?

I ask because these to me these questions seem quite obscure questions and yet they are bothering you, so I am hoping there is a significance
Click to expand...

i think, though can't be sure, that the Higgs part was all for accepting the CVA, but the CCC part wasn't?
 
jimmyhillsfanclub

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
Well Q1 is my favourite..
... As if it's true and as much as I've read elsewhere, it would mean 2 things... ACL are, in effect, on borrowed time, and are effectively a loss making business..
.. but may continue on borrowed time for several years to come meaning bad news for sisu and potentially even shitter news for us fans
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
lordsummerisle said:
i think, though can't be sure, that the Higgs part was all for accepting the CVA, but the CCC part wasn't?
Click to expand...

No.

A different Higgs ;)

Have to admit though, with Higgs as related to ACL, Higgs as related to Allard way, then Derek Higgs the former director... it's pretty easy to forget which Higgs hat is on when referring to Higgs at any one time!

Perhaps Rob S should sort out a few meetings so he can say he's spoken with the Higgs/Higgs/Higgs side of it all too.
 
lordsummerisle

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
Deleted member 5849 said:
No.

A different Higgs ;)

Have to admit though, with Higgs as related to ACL, Higgs as related to Allard way, then Derek Higgs the former director... it's pretty easy to forget which Higgs hat is on when referring to Higgs at any one time!

Perhaps Rob S should sort out a few meetings so he can say he's spoken with the Higgs/Higgs/Higgs side of it all too.
Click to expand...

Such a shame it's not the Skol Trust!
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
vu8y9y7e.jpg
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Hmmm, another new poster. Random, specific questions aimed at a non-Sisu party. Never comes back to engage.

I feel we've been here before.

Such a shame I don't know the name of the Sisu PR company, it would make the accusations so much easier.

How about this for a rule: If you're a fan and you know things others don't and you keep that information to yourself. You're an [Expletive Deleted]. Either you're on the fans' side or your not. If you play games, then for me you're no fan, you've got vested interests.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lordsummerisle

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Hmmm, another new poster. Random, specific questions aimed at a non-Sisu party. Never comes back to engage.

I feel we've been here before.

Such a shame I don't know the name of the Sisu PR company, it would make the accusations so much easier.

How about this for a rule: If you're a fan and you know things others don't and you keep that information to yourself. You're a c**t. Either you're on the club's side or your not.
Click to expand...

I think the club one is Advent, the one owned by Adam Dent, though think they also do stuff for CCC.

Simon Gilbert used to work for them..
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
To be fair though if JS TF or ML had the courtesy to come on here and answer fans questions. My posting history would be full if questions to them.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Hmmm, another new poster. Random, specific questions aimed at a non-Sisu party. Never comes back to engage.

I feel we've been here before.

Such a shame I don't know the name of the Sisu PR company, it would make the accusations so much easier.

How about this for a rule: If you're a fan and you know things others don't and you keep that information to yourself. You're a c**t. Either you're on the fans' side or your not. If you play games, then for me you're no fan, you've got vested interests.
Click to expand...

Doesn't John Clarke run a PR company these days?

I imagine SISU have an in house PR officer to be fair.
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
dongonzalos said:
To be fair though if JS TF or ML had the courtesy to come on here and answer fans questions. My posting history would be full if questions to them.
Click to expand...

Isn't it anyway?

Sorry to go off on a rant, and genuinely sorry to Ian if I'm off the mark, but get sick of people doing this. If you've got info, share, if you came across it a certain way, share. Why on earth wouldn't you. Smacks of the SCG and the Forum fans with their slight sense of superiority and "I'm heavily involved with SBITC don't you know!".

Fans are fans man.
 
lordsummerisle

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Isn't it anyway?

Sorry to go off on a rant, and genuinely sorry to Ian if I'm off the mark, but get sick of people doing this. If you've got info, share, if you came across it a certain way, share. Why on earth wouldn't you. Smacks of the SCG and the Forum fans with their slight sense of superiority and "I'm heavily involved with SBITC don't you know!".

Fans are fans man.
Click to expand...

To be fair, some members of the Trust have sometimes come across that way as well, more so when Haskell/Hoffma/Elliot were around.

Lots of "Watch this space", and "I can't tell you yet, but some news coming soon".

If you can't tell us anything yet, then don't hint so as to make yourself out as more important than mere plebs.

Always driven me mad, from whichever side, especially as it's generally bollocks anyway.
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
lordsummerisle said:
To be fair, some members of the Trust have sometimes come across that way as well, more so when Haskell/Hoffma/Elliot were around.

Lots of "Watch this space", and "I can't tell you yet, but some news coming soon".

If you can't tell us anything yet, then don't hint so as to make yourself out as more important than mere plebs.

Always driven me mad, from whichever side, especially as it's generally bollocks anyway.
Click to expand...

I completely agree. One of the more frustrating issues I have with the Trust is the feeling anything at all needs to be kept secret. Should just be a conduit to the fans.

The biggest crime on all sides is treating the fans like mushrooms. We shouldn't indulge as well.
 
lordsummerisle

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
I completely agree. One of the more frustrating issues I have with the Trust is the feeling anything at all needs to be kept secret. Should just be a conduit to the fans.

The biggest crime on all sides is treating the fans like mushrooms. We shouldn't indulge as well.
Click to expand...

Yep, can't criticise others for being secretive when are yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)
Top