No future with SISU
New Member
What is a normal forum?
A few questions for PWKH (40 Viewers)
- Thread starter Ian1779
- Start date
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Ha ha. I wish I could be arsed to find that post you made about me where you were going of on one about how pathetic I was for referring to RFC as Mark. Whatever it was you said, right back at ya.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Not really. In this instance the comment is entirely justified. Why would a poster try and answer a question on Peter's behalf. Its logical as they are so interested in questions to Peter that they are indeed Peter.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
In your warped mind maybe.
skybluefred
New Member
If the Club wanted the money from parking--pies--hospitality boxes etc, WHY did THEY SELL those rights?. Having sold them why should they get them back for free?.
skybluefred
New Member
When a Company is in admin the only person you can deal with is the Administrator. The club is still in admin until Appleton finish's his investigations.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Why not? Why if you supported the club would you want that? Only a cretin or a troll would want that. Which are you?
Astute
Well-Known Member
So you don't want a charity to get their money back. What does that make you?
skybluefred
New Member
It's time you stopped looking in the mirror and talking to yourself, your becoming more stupid with every post you make.
sky blue john
Well-Known Member
I support ccfc but I don't want the club paying Arvo 1million + every year in interest.
Probably why the club can't afford the Ricoh ?
James Smith
Well-Known Member
I wasn't trying to answer on behalf of PWKH, you mentioned GMK and previously I thought someone had said that they didn't take new registrations. Hence my question and why I thanked you for the answer when you kindly gave it.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
With that logic why don't we get CCC to double the council tax and donate all the extra money to the club. You would be in favour of that if you supported the club wouldn't you? Surely only a cretin or a troll would be against that.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I'd support it.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Realistic. The charity will never get its money back - they didn't invest wisely - according to CCC and their valuation if the Higgs share. Or are you saying they lied about that?
You don't exactly live in Coventry then , do you ?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Minor detail.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
And would you assert that anyone who didn't was being unreasonable?
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Ian do you think Les Reid could post on here as himself if he wanted to? Like Simon does. Les was quite straight speaking in the CET. Would it impact in him somehow to do the same here?
Nick
Administrator
I guess so as he did on Twitter before going quiet
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Neither do the people who run our club. Neither will be the stadium if they get their way
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
It's weird as a Cov fan why he can't express his views anymore even if he is off the job
Nick
Administrator
No idea, obviously something there I guess. The same as Simon can't come on and say "I think so and so are wankers".
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
But les isn't saying anything on here 'as Les'
Nick
Administrator
He probably saw the shit Linnell got
Surprise you haven't started a thread demanding an apology from him for something...
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
He probably saw the shit Linnell got
Surprise you haven't started a thread demanding an apology from him for something...
Les or SL?
Who gave him shit on here anyway?
Les don't strike me as the type to worry about Neanderthals
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I know what you meant there I just meant which one should I ask to apologise.
Like I say can't see Les getting phased by people here.
Surprised SL did
MichaelCCFC
New Member
To be fair didn't someone fairly recently out shhmee who is only the relative of someone who is more involved in this and haven't there been some fairly unsubtle posts about OSB's 'agenda'?
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
The thing that annoyed me about Les' agenda was in my humble opinion it is easy to gig into a charity and a council as they are generally bound by law and legislation that makes them accountable.
So the stuff he was finding out was probably good but where was the hard journalism. Where was he finding out the stuff about a hedge fund notoriously secretive. Where was the info about the what's happening in the Cayman Islands where was the pressure for info about the new stadium etc etc.
it never happened because in my opinion that is harder to do.
So the stuff he was finding out was probably good but where was the hard journalism. Where was he finding out the stuff about a hedge fund notoriously secretive. Where was the info about the what's happening in the Cayman Islands where was the pressure for info about the new stadium etc etc.
it never happened because in my opinion that is harder to do.
Nick
Administrator
Could maybe ask Simon why it isn't being done then?
Nick
Administrator
I think Schmee outted himself, people seemed to know anyway.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
I did out myself, but only because people were making inaccurate accusations and I'd rather have my opinion ignored for accurate reasons!
But yeah, apparently people have known on GMK for a while and I'm not exactly secretive about it.
I think Michael's point was more that people use who I am to make aspersions about my ability to give an independent viewpoint, same as OSB since he worked for ACL (for like 3 minutes).
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Well we praise Steven Pressley and he's a Sisu employee
TBH I think the only people that need questioning are those that claim special knowledge of the situation. Everyone else can be debated on an even playing field, some on here (mostly from the pro-Sisu side TBH) play a lot of the "You'll find out" "Wait till it all comes out" which is impossible to actually discuss (which I guess is the point).