Questions To Answer (3 Viewers)

wince

Well-Known Member
He is fronting this offer and complains about the club never answering questions?

Isn't this thread about the offer he has made?
So you are complaining about a Coventry fan (trying to break this deadlock) complaining about not getting answers from the owners , like I said before you and others are in a corner now and will just argue anything, very very sad
 

mrtrench

Well-Known Member
Maybe if it wasn't for £51987.35, which will get the owners backs up before they have even read it.

I love all this numerology. Perhaps I should go to the hill and hold up the number 0, to signify the number of shits I give about the side since they moved to Northampton.
 

Nick

Administrator
So you are complaining about a Coventry fan (trying to break this deadlock) complaining about not getting answers from the owners , like I said before you and others are in a corner now and will just argue anything, very very sad

In what corner?

I'm saying why is Michael doing exactly what he moans about the club doing?
 

Lorksalordy

New Member
This thread and its monster of a father go to show how maddening this whole situation is and how mental it is sending people.

If the "offer" means all SISU have been sent is the publicised letter then their justifiable response can be to laugh it out of town. The responses from KCIC so far today have been at a level I expect from Fisher and Labovich. Challenging and asking questions of them is one thing but stooping to their level is another.

Very poor form in my opinion and playing with fans emotions offering false hope


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
You'll forgive me for being more concerned about the actually running of our club than an offer that this fan group knows can not be taken seriously

Why can't the fanbase contribute to getting the Club home for us ,the players and the manager, with It's obvious benefits as an overall strategy? It supersedes both parties resistant to those three Substantial priorities ,vital for this clubs survival ,I'm just amazed the Chamber of commerce never got together and thrashed something like this out ages ago .
Rather than exposing agendas It could and should result In healing some of the differences between us all and the club .

If It's not this deal then a better one should be attempted ,there Is no good reason not to do this .
 

wince

Well-Known Member
In what corner?

I'm saying why is Michael doing exactly what he moans about the club doing
Just very sad , 90% of our own fans and probably 90+% of fans of other clubs ,when/if there club had been moved away ,would ask ,beg plead why can we not come home ,yet, you want to get fans getting of there arse to try and do something to explain every little detail of any plan ,without asking the only people with the power(the owners) just very sad
 

Nick

Administrator
This thread and its monster of a father go to show how maddening this whole situation is and how mental it is sending people.

If the "offer" means all SISU have been sent is the publicised letter then their justifiable response can be to laugh it out of town. The responses from KCIC so far today have been at a level I expect from Fisher and Labovich. Challenging and asking questions of them is one thing but stooping to their level is another.

Very poor form in my opinion and playing with fans emotions offering false hope


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is what I tried to get through but nobody will have it. Rise above the way sisu act and show them how it should be done rather just act like they do and then nobody likes.
 

Nick

Administrator
Just very sad , 90% of our own fans and probably 90+% of fans of other clubs ,when/if there club had been moved away ,would ask ,beg plead why can we not come home ,yet, you want to get fans getting of there arse to try and do something to explain every little detail of any plan ,without asking the only people with the power(the owners) just very sad

I don't think anybody has asked for every little deal, just the basics?
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
So how is it a fans group with no members?

So Michael does a lot of stuff he believes the fans want his own time his own money most of the time......
Don't forget he is just a normal bloke on average money not like others on here that like to gloat and make out they are something special......

I have been to numerous forums organised and secret at all of them I was 100% assured that the ground will go ahead they have also said that no one is interested in buying CCFC and that they are not interested in selling.

Why should I disbelieve them?

Just want to know where when etc.

So if you believe that I am trying to divert things you are wrong.

This takeover will never happen so it is irrelevant the new ground will?




Again you are saying it makes it ok for a fans group to ignore questions which is what they have been ranting about the club going.

Plus most people know the stadium is bollocks.

All of the people trying to divert attention away really don't make Michael look good.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Chamber of Commerce I believe our stadium leader is on it?

Why can't the fanbase contribute to getting the Club home for us ,the players and the manager, with It's obvious benefits as an overall strategy? It supersedes both parties resistant to those three Substantial priorities ,vital for this clubs survival ,I'm just amazed the Chamber of commerce never got together and thrashed something like this out ages ago .
Rather than exposing agendas It could and should result In healing some of the differences between us all and the club .

If It's not this deal then a better one should be attempted ,there Is no good reason not to do this .
 

Nick

Administrator
So how is it a fans group with no members?

So Michael does a lot of stuff he believes the fans want his own time his own money most of the time......
Don't forget he is just a normal bloke on average money not like others on here that like to gloat and make out they are something special......

I have been to numerous forums organised and secret at all of them I was 100% assured that the ground will go ahead they have also said that no one is interested in buying CCFC and that they are not interested in selling.

Why should I disbelieve them?

Just want to know where when etc.

So if you believe that I am trying to divert things you are wrong.

This takeover will never happen so it is irrelevant the new ground will?

People make their opinions based on the facts don't they? I havent seen anything to make me believe there will be a stadium. People are entitled to ask questions but most people minds are made up.

It seems that because sisu don't answer questions it makes it ok for Michael to not answer, which most should say fair enough about if he wasn't sending and posting weekly news letters moaning about the lack of answers from sisu.

If he was to rise above their level and show them how it should be done it would be a lot better wouldn't it?

If kcic doesn't represent fans then I suggest his weekly cet polls and speaking on behalf of fans should stop.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I just have a feeling the 5,000 number is significant. I thinks it so a line can be in the next newsletter - "sisu won't play in the Ricoh for free and get twice as many as at Sixfields"

I think there is no deal - nothing discussed and its a publicity stunt which has duped an awful lot on here.

I may be wrong - I hope I am - and I hope we get an answer quickly from kcic.
 

Nick

Administrator
I just have a feeling the 5,000 number is significant. I thinks it so a line can be in the next newsletter - "sisu won't play in the Ricoh for free and get twice as many as at Sixfields"

I think there is no deal - nothing discussed and its a publicity stunt which has duped an awful lot on here.

I may be wrong - I hope I am - and I hope we get an answer quickly from kcic.

I also hope to be shown up, proven wrong and have to grovel with an apology to Michael if we are all proved wrong!
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
None of us know how serious this offer is. We all more or less know it won't get us anywhere though. It goes against what SISU have been doing to our club for a couple of years now. Why would they give up now?

I have two points.

Why should anyone pay the rent on their behalf whatever the attendances?

It is better for any negotiations to happen without all of the details out in the open until the offer is accepted, refused or ignored. Then it is time to let the world know.
 

Nick

Administrator
None of us know how serious this offer is. We all more or less know it won't get us anywhere though. It goes against what SISU have been doing to our club for a couple of years now. Why would they give up now?

I have two points.

Why should anyone pay the rent on their behalf whatever the attendances?

It is better for any negotiations to happen without all of the details out in the open until the offer is accepted, refused or ignored. Then it is time to let the world know.

I agree on both, ccfc should pay their way.

I also agree about keeping it quiet, so what's with the running the media and posting it all over the internet?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I just have a feeling the 5,000 number is significant. I thinks it so a line can be in the next newsletter - "sisu won't play in the Ricoh for free and get twice as many as at Sixfields"

I think there is no deal - nothing discussed and its a publicity stunt which has duped an awful lot on here.

I may be wrong - I hope I am - and I hope we get an answer quickly from kcic.

Surely the reality Is there would 4-5 times the attendance ,can't believe it's just a stunt to show what agenda's are ,we all know and have done for a year that ten more thousands would significantly aid the Players and manager and as I said earlier " Heal" what is a huge rift that threatens to at best leave the club in a tinpot ground with around 5-7K interested In the Nadir of league football,or DEAD.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
None of us know how serious this offer is. We all more or less know it won't get us anywhere though. It goes against what SISU have been doing to our club for a couple of years now. Why would they give up now?

I have two points.

Why should anyone pay the rent on their behalf whatever the attendances?

It is better for any negotiations to happen without all of the details out in the open until the offer is accepted, refused or ignored. Then it is time to let the world know.

There would be a very powerful reason for doing it. Michael has claimed local businessmen are prepared to pay £1 million.

There is no reason why ACL would not agree to that for at least two years to cover all costs.

Sisu would really have no choice but to agree the deal. Refusing it would be impossible to justify to the community and the Football League. They would be pushed into a corner.

We want the club back - right? If people have made the offer - make the offer.
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Lol !!!
Nick, Grendel, Trench and other social club members.
Its funny that your all whinging about the finer details of the offer from kcic, it has only been a few days.
How many years have we been waiting on answers from your buddies ???
And still waiting but you don't care !!!
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Wow that response took lots of intelligence !!!
I'm sure your post won't be deleted because it suits Nicks keep Sisu in agenda !!
 
Last edited:

Nick

Administrator
Wow that response took lots of intelligence !!!
I'm sure your post won't be deleted because it suits Nicks keep Sisu in agenda !!

It was deleted before I saw this reply, although I would love to know what SISU in agenda this is or is it you just talking rubbish again?

Have you ever posted anything constructive and thought out?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Lol !!!
Nick, Grendel, Trench and other social club members.
Its funny that your all whinging about the finer details of the offer from kcic, it has only been a few days.
How many years have we been waiting on answers from your buddies ???
And still waiting but you don't care !!!

Mr trench is extremely ant-sisu as is larks, rusty and Samo. Why are they raising these concerns?
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
It was deleted before I saw this reply, although I would love to know what SISU in agenda this is or is it you just talking rubbish again?

Have you ever posted anything constructive and thought out?

As I say...
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
There would be a very powerful reason for doing it. Michael has claimed local businessmen are prepared to pay £1 million.

There is no reason why ACL would not agree to that for at least two years to cover all costs.

Sisu would really have no choice but to agree the deal. Refusing it would be impossible to justify to the community and the Football League. They would be pushed into a corner.

We want the club back - right? If people have made the offer - make the offer.

The offer made through the FL was a better offer than staying at Sixfields. The reply from the FL was that they can't force SISU to do a deal. We will have to wait for the three years to be up at least before we see if the FL has grown a backbone.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The offer made through the FL was a better offer than staying at Sixfields. The reply from the FL was that they can't force SISU to do a deal. We will have to wait for the three years to be up at least before we see if the FL has grown a backbone.

No we won't. Michael has a consortium of businessmen who are prepared to pay £1 million towards the rent.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Mr trench is extremely ant-sisu as is larks, rusty and Samo. Why are they raising these concerns?

This is how people around here, in the warped world of SkyBlueTalk, get labelled as pro-SISU.

Perish the thought they want things to have the best chance of succeeding, so want some reassurances. No, that must mean they're pro-SISU!
 

Nick

Administrator
This is how people around here, in the warped world of SkyBlueTalk, get labelled as pro-SISU.

Perish the thought they want things to have the best chance of succeeding, so want some reassurances. No, that must mean they're pro-SISU!

Didn't you warn about SISU at the start? That means that as you didn't agree with the "majority" then it means you are now Pro SISU. :)
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Didn't you warn about SISU at the start? That means that as you didn't agree with the "majority" then it means you are now Pro SISU. :)

They're bloody mentalists.

But since when did it have to be either/or and SISU have the exclusive option on mentalism?!?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
i dont get why 2 threads on the same subject are running

This is a separate thread in the hope Michael will answer the questions raised. Why?
 

Gosford Green

Well-Known Member
KCIC are fans of the club. The owners including fisher and co are not fans just ruthless business types whose primary purpose is make money that benefits not the club but a foreign owned hedge fund. They care nothing for fans that is blindingly obvious.

Fans would not move the club 35 miles away, not much matters to most of us other then the club playing in Coventry.
 

Nick

Administrator
KCIC are fans of the club. The owners including fisher and co are not fans just ruthless business types whose primary purpose is make money that benefits not the club but a foreign owned hedge fund. They care nothing for fans that is blindingly obvious.

Fans would not move the club 35 miles away, not much matters to most of us other then the club playing in Coventry.

So what is that to do with the questions?

I want the club to be back in Coventry, I just think we need to be cynical of everything.

Some of the people who want it to be blindly accepted just to bring us back are the same ones who said the high rent at the Ricoh before was SISU's fault because they accepted it....
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
So what is that to do with the questions?

I want the club to be back in Coventry, I just think we need to be cynical of everything.

Some of the people who want it to be blindly accepted just to bring us back are the same ones who said the high rent at the Ricoh before was SISU's fault because they accepted it....

Are these the same or different people that want Sisu to own the Ricoh?
 

Nick

Administrator
Are these the same or different people that want Sisu to own the Ricoh?

It probably depends on what Michael's newsletter said that week...

Do you agree that after all the shit we need to be cynical and get things right?

I don't care who owns the stadium as long as it is the best deal for the club. Surely that is the same as most fans?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top