New FOIs. No contact. (17 Viewers)
- Thread starter CJ_covblaze
- Start date
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Thanks CJ. No surprises.
We all know a new stadium isn't happening so why we still go on about it and or consider it an option I don't know.
RFC I'm sure will find a way to conclude this is sisu doing their work but he baffles most.
It's clearly obvious the best most realistic option is a long term rent deal at the Ricoh based on league etc and work on relations and income streams and go from there.
We all know a new stadium isn't happening so why we still go on about it and or consider it an option I don't know.
RFC I'm sure will find a way to conclude this is sisu doing their work but he baffles most.
It's clearly obvious the best most realistic option is a long term rent deal at the Ricoh based on league etc and work on relations and income streams and go from there.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I wonder if this has anything to do with the big news on the new ground to be expected in the new year that gave RFC a wide on?
skybluericoh
Well-Known Member
I'm surprised that you still doubt anything SISU say. When was the last time they said or did anything that was either stupid or did not happened?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Strangely they are the most truthful people in football when it suits
To be fair all fisher needs to do is attend a sky blue trust meeting and if a question is asked if the stadium will be built and he says yes that's evidence it really is happening.
Astute
Well-Known Member
It was stupid to take us to Northampton. And for once they told the truth.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
What after he has had xmas dinner at yours
oh by the way he was asked laughed at as usual.
only one who believes any thang he says is you and your mates
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I'd believe him so long as he didn't mention 3 or weeks in his confirmation.
Nick
Administrator
Who believes Tim Fisher?
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
So was Mr strange and Mr Ward must have been misled need to take their blinkers off.
Nick
Administrator
Could be worse, they could be having blinkers on for a random rugby team and hanging on their every word
covmark
Well-Known Member
No one, unless it suits an argument.
Are you surprised that the most stupid chuckle brother is making shit up again?
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Oh so I mention people belive tim fisher and you question me but grendel mentions the trust believing everything and you says nothing get out of his bed and open your eyes.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
So what have I made up then moron.
oh that you have a brain sorry I take it back
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Ask Grendull. He seems to know.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Your missing my point. Steve Brown said on here that Eastwood said that they approached the council first and not the other way round. That proved it to be true.
So when Honest Tim gets the chance and says it Steve no doubt will say its true?
covmark
Well-Known Member
come off it, you're forever talking shite. Tbh I think most people try and block you and your attention seeking mate out now. You're both full of absolute shit.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
So when Tim said they didn't want the deal that wasps were offered he was lying?
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Could be worse, they could be having blinkers on for a random rugby team and hanging on their every word
You mean like the people who said who gives a fuck about rugby etc etc and now crying because they feel Cov and Wasps fans have been let down.
Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Says Mr Shite
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
How the fcuk is anyone supposed to know. Same as anything with him or anyone else from SISU I'll believe it when I see it so there is no way of knowing with this statement. IMO though it sounded like sour grapes to me, nothing more and nothing less.
Nick
Administrator
I personally don't believe a thing any party in this says, it's all spun to shit. The real damage is where people are like "Yes but wasps said there is no pr machine, while they were attending a fans meeting for a football team....doing PR" because he said so, whereas Tim Fisher opens his mouth and its bollocks. Unless we can use what Fisher says in our favour then it is gospel.
Whereas if you treat everything everybody says as bollocks until proven true it is easier.
Whereas if you treat everything everybody says as bollocks until proven true it is easier.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
What would be his reason for lying about that?
GaryPendrysEyes
Well-Known Member
I look forward the The Telegraph getting a response from Fisher on this. Have Sisu been lying to Cov fans and the people of Coventry for years on this or not?
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Shame you don't try blocking me just press the ignore button or is that to hard for you.
your still a moron and that is the truth,
Astute
Well-Known Member
Shall we think about it?
5.5m for the lease and take over a 14m loan for the Ricoh arena or build a stadium much smaller and without much chance of making money from it whilst it will be outside Coventry and struggle to get it built for 20m.
I say he was lying unless there is no thoughts of building a stadium and they wanted the Ricoh for nothing. And this means they didn't want to pay for it like Wasps did. But then he is still lying about the new stadium.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
No I'm not missing your point has mr eastwoods word been quetioned the has he told us lies that we know of?
Sorry but we were told that they had been in touch with the highways agency acording to the foia they haven't so who should I believe?
funny how people always try to shift the conversation when criticising Sisu is Concerned.
What has the original thread got to do with the wasps and anything they may have said?
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
There is also another scenario. Where people who have to make massive financial decisions. May not personally completely believe what SISU say about a new stadium. However when it come to making such massive decisions they can't really base them on 'well I didn't really believe them'
Then there is also the fact most of us did not believe a ground share was going to happen. Then it did.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Cant possibly reply that due to confidential restraints.
What will be will be they should just come out and tell us where it is likely to be.
Can't be that good of a location or I'm sure someone else would have snapped it up already.
covmark
Well-Known Member
If you're going to insult me by calling me a moron, then make sure you can spell you fucking helmet.
J
Jack Griffin
Guest
If this is the title of the next story they publish thin it looks like a good one if you ask me.
So how does Mr Fisher square that with reporting in a recent SCG conference call he had met with the Highways Agency.
Last edited by a moderator:
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Why I don't pretend to be the brightest spark on here if your so clever then at least come back with a better reply then that any way wasn't insulting you just pointing out a fact.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
The Telegraph and / or Trust should send a (polite!) open letter to SISU and request that an independent person be shown all the information on the new ground. They can sign confidentiality agreements and won't share any details but can simply report back if they believe anything is actually happening or not.