Some people keep pushing this without having any real figures ?
People have given you figures, you just ignore them.
Our turnover 15k fans in 2011/12 was £10.8m. Only barnsley, peterborough's and Doncaster's was lower, despite having larger attendances than 9 over clubs, our turnover was in the 3-4 lowest in the league.
Even when you look at the 2012/13 season -
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/may/22/club-by-club-guide-championship-finances-2012-2013
Based on 15k fans and a turnover of £10.8m, our turnover is still in the bottom 3-4 in the league - only bristol, barnsley and peterborough was lower......what happened to them that season?
Ergo - little/no access to additional revenues (on top of the ones we already get i.e Pitchside advertising, etc) means regardless of the level of rent our turnover in the championship is confined to be one of the lowest 3-4 in the league. That means we are more likely to get relegated, therefore more likely to become a yoyo club. With allowable losses of £13m per annum, parachute payments, etc we will struggle even more.
We don't know what wasps will or will not allow us, we do need to have the conversation, however we cannot discount the new stadium without knowing more about the business plan, or without knowing what wasps will and won't let us have, and how much that may cost us. What we do know - the facts speak for themselves, that a rent matchday only limited/no access to revenue severely limits us and places a glass ceiling above us.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors