Something to be proud of? (1 Viewer)

Covstu

Well-Known Member
yes I think this is something to be happy about, we have put our stance out there straight away. well done.
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
Who was the first to come on the thread with a negative post?...Sick Boy of course. Think you need to grow up a bit mate. Anyone with an ounce of brains wouldn't welcome Evans joining our Club. Well done Fisher. The first and only thing to come out of your mouth which the vast majority of City fans will 100% agree with. Should have happened with MK as well!
 

Sick Boy

Well-Known Member
Who was the first to come on the thread with a negative post?...Sick Boy of course. Think you need to grow up a bit mate. Anyone with an ounce of brains wouldn't welcome Evans joining our Club. Well done Fisher. The first and only thing to come out of your mouth which the vast majority of City fans will 100% agree with. Should have happened with MK as well!

You mean the same way our own fans sang 'she said yes marlon'? My post was in response to the mouth breathers on here who atrack the club was any reason.

Anyway, when's your next mensa meeting mate?
 
Last edited:

Nick

Administrator
You mean the same way our own fans sang 'she said yes marlon'? My post was in response to the mouth breathers on here who atrack the club was any reason.

Anyway, when's your next mensa meeting mate?

The same fans who then sang she said no...
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Or it could just be because of why he was in prison? You know as was said.

Really ?

BBC Sport has contacted clubs in League One and Two for their stance on whether they would sign convicted rapist Ched Evans.

Where ?

I'm not giving Sisu any credit. After all didn't we sign a woman beater ?

Interestingly the case is subject to a Judicial Review so I will reserve judgement.
Anybody been drunk and had it away with a drunk girl ?
 
Last edited:

covmark

Well-Known Member
Really ?

BBC Sport has contacted clubs in League One and Two for their stance on whether they would sign convicted rapist Ched Evans.

Where ?

I'm not giving Sisu any credit. After all didn't we sign a woman beater ?

Interestingly the case is subject to a Judicial Review so I will reserve judgement.
Anybody been drunk and had it away with a drunk girl ?
Dear oh dear. Can't you just permanently transfer yourself to the Wasps forum.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Really ?

BBC Sport has contacted clubs in League One and Two for their stance on whether they would sign convicted rapist Ched Evans.

Where ?

I'm not giving Sisu any credit. After all didn't we sign a woman beater ?

Interestingly the case is subject to a Judicial Review so I will reserve judgement.
Anybody been drunk and had it away with a drunk girl ?

You do know that although Sisu own the club, that SISU and the club are 2 separate things? When i posted the OP, I meant the club, CCFC not sisu capital.

How can you reserve judgement? There has already been a judgement. There is no innocent until proven guilty - he's been proven guilty by a jury and 3 Judges where rejected his appeal. He is still serving his sentence on licence, he is a registered sex offender.. He is therefore guilty until proven innocent.

And to suggest that this is not the reason us and the other 11 clubs have said categorically that they won't sign him and that is actually football reasons is just odd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Dear oh dear. Can't you just permanently transfer yourself to the Wasps forum.

Why anyone gives the pathetic little WUM any attention is beyond me. He's getting worse every day .
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
Really ?

BBC Sport has contacted clubs in League One and Two for their stance on whether they would sign convicted rapist Ched Evans.

Where ?

I'm not giving Sisu any credit. After all didn't we sign a woman beater ?

Interestingly the case is subject to a Judicial Review so I will reserve judgement.
Anybody been drunk and had it away with a drunk girl ?

Dear dear me
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Really ?

BBC Sport has contacted clubs in League One and Two for their stance on whether they would sign convicted rapist Ched Evans.

Where ?

I'm not giving Sisu any credit. After all didn't we sign a woman beater ?

Interestingly the case is subject to a Judicial Review so I will reserve judgement.
Anybody been drunk and had it away with a drunk girl ?

Not one who couldn't say yes due to her condition.

No means no and no reply means no. If you "have it away" after that its rape, end off.
 
Last edited:

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Not one who couldn't say yes due to her condition.

No means no and no reply means no. If you "have it away" after that its rape, end off.

Evidently she was too drunk to know what was going on and so was he.
Evidently in the same condition she was able to have sex with someone else but he was not convicted.
As I say I will reserve judgement until after the cases JR.
 

Nick

Administrator
Evidently she was too drunk to know what was going on and so was he.
Evidently in the same condition she was able to have sex with someone else but he was not convicted.
As I say I will reserve judgement until after the cases JR.

Until then we can probably turn it into something to have a go at the club about then yeah?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Evidently she was too drunk to know what was going on and so was he.
Evidently in the same condition she was able to have sex with someone else but he was not convicted.
As I say I will reserve judgement until after the cases JR.

The case review won't decide if he's guilty or not, it will only decide whether it should go back to the court of appeal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Until then we can probably turn it into something to have a go at the club about then yeah?

I have not had a go at the club about it, your twisting things again.
I said there are other reasons that clubs, including CCFC, would not take on this guy.
All clubs would answer 'No' to the question as it's not worth being linked with this guy and his questionable morals.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
The case review won't decide if he's guilty or not, it will only decide whether it should go back to the court of appeal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

I bow to your greater knowledge as all my information only comes from listening to Question Time.
 

boatang

Active Member
While I dont condone Evans actions, hasnt he served his time and should be allowed to get on with his life?

Is this so different to the Lee Hughes affair? I hated Hughes, and his crime was serious, but there was not an outcry saying he should never play football again. He served his time.

Both committed horrible crimes, both served their time, why not both allowed to return to their jobs?

Or is there a big difference that I am missing?
 
Last edited:

stupot07

Well-Known Member
I have not had a go at the club about it, your twisting things again.
I said there are other reasons that clubs, including CCFC, would not take on this guy.
All clubs would answer 'No' to the question as it's not worth being linked with this guy and his questionable morals.

But all clubs didn't say no, only 12 did, the rest sat on the fence.

The only reason clubs would say no, given that he will pay for peanuts, is because of the conviction and its impact on every aspect of the club.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
While I dont condone Evans actions, hasnt he served his time and should be allowed to get on with his life?

Is this so different to the Lee Hughes affair? Much as I hated Hughes, and his crime was serious, but there was not an outcry saying he should never play football again. He served his time.

No he hasn't served his time, he's still on licence which is part of his sentence. He can get on with his life, but outside of football.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
While I dont condone Evans actions, hasnt he served his time and should be allowed to get on with his life?

Is this so different to the Lee Hughes affair? Much as I hated Hughes, and his crime was serious, but there was not an outcry saying he should never play football again. He served his time.

He has not served his full sentence and I guess he is a registered sex offender.
The arguments stem around him being a football idol, evidently someone to look up to (?) and whether people might believe his actions were acceptable.
 

boatang

Active Member
Did Lee Hughes then serve his entire sentence before he was allowed to play football again? And was Marlon King ever out on licence?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
But all clubs didn't say no, only 12 did, the rest sat on the fence.

The only reason clubs would say no, given that he will pay for peanuts, is because of the conviction and its impact on every aspect of the club.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

They will all say no as they don't want to be linked with him.
Those who have not answered, can't be arsed to get associated in any way with the whole sordid affair.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
They will all say no as they don't want to be linked with him.
Those who have not answered, can't be arsed to get associated in any way with the whole sordid affair.

And they said no because of football reasons? Or because of his conviction?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
While I dont condone Evans actions, hasnt he served his time and should be allowed to get on with his life?

Is this so different to the Lee Hughes affair? I hated Hughes, and his crime was serious, but there was not an outcry saying he should never play football again. He served his time.

Both committed horrible crimes, both served their time, why not both allowed to return to their jobs?

Or is there a big difference that I am missing?

There was a huge outcry when Hughes was coming back to football.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top