Is the fact that he isn't using his investigative journalistic skills and instead writing open letters a good indicator that there really isn't anything to investigate? I'm waiting for there's a smoking gun and heads will roll rumours to start circulating as they did when JR1 was on it's way.
It's a bit tricky to investigate if the main player here, the Council, isn't answering any questions. The logic here seems to be that because the first judicial review failed the council can have done no wrong since then. Politely, that's not clear thinking in my opinion.
There are some very detailed questions there, to which I'd like to know the answers. There's no way that anyone can tell me all of the people on that list are SISU puppets.
As before if people don't want a enquiry because all that matters to them is that SISU lost, fair enough. Personally I think there's enough going on here, and enough public funds at risk to merit more than just a box-ticking exercise by an auditor.