chinamans view
Well-Known Member
What can he do or change for tues game, to get result. I don't want him to go defensive, attack we need 3 points
what can Mowbray change for tues ? (10 Viewers)
- Thread starter chinamans view
- Start date
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Get in a new keeper, centre midfielder, send back the Brentford bloke and play Odelusi as Shmmeee said.
eastwoodsdustman
Well-Known Member
Get Thomas into the team. We looked better when he was playing before he got injured.
Gint11
Well-Known Member
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Yeah, the Brentford bloke missed out on Saturday anyway. I think we desperately need another keeper. Shame we couldn't hold onto JAmie Jones, I thought he was pretty decent.
Pete in Portugal
Well-Known Member
Our defence is clearly not good enough for 4-3-3, so I think he'll go 4-4-2 with Samuel & Tudgay up front because they seem to play well together. At the back I suppose he'll have to consider bringing Webster in for his experience, in spite of his inadequacies. And if fit, I'd play Thomas instead of Barton as the holding CM with Fleck the attacking CM and Odelusi and JOB on the wings. As has been pointed out by many, he needs to impress on both wingers that they need to support their full backs.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
... his mind on his contract ?
chinamans view
Well-Known Member
He has no time to get loans in for tomorrow TORCH
eastwoodsdustman
Well-Known Member
Whats so funny? We need someone to break up play and he does that well enough. We were cruising away at Gills until he want off injured and have struggled since. Coincidence? Possibly. Possibly not.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
What time is the deadline then? I thought it was 12pm on a match day? If we're too late then he needs to sort a keeper out for Saturday.
Short term then, Barton our Odelusi in. Martin out, Webster in.
Short term then, Barton our Odelusi in. Martin out, Webster in.
skybluerors
Member
Agree with all this. The last time we played well was Walsall away and Thomas played that day.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
My team 4-4-2 would see
Burge (need an experienced keeper for the last 12 games though)
Phillips
Webster
Pennington
Stokes
Odelusi
Obrien
Fleck
Turgott
Samuel
Nouble
4-4-2 and get at them
Burge (need an experienced keeper for the last 12 games though)
Phillips
Webster
Pennington
Stokes
Odelusi
Obrien
Fleck
Turgott
Samuel
Nouble
4-4-2 and get at them
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
send back german striker
play williams in no.10 role
put thomas in for barton
odelesi in for nouble or tudgay
draft in a loan goalie
=====
just another monday
play williams in no.10 role
put thomas in for barton
odelesi in for nouble or tudgay
draft in a loan goalie
=====
just another monday
To Shore it up a little and to deal with the crosses that Bradford pump into the box - stats show they are one of the highest in the league for it, id go -
Burge
Pennington RB
Webster - absolute despise but two big lumps up top require his presense
Martin
Phillips LB
Odeluswi
O Brien
Fleck
Williams
Nouble
Samuel.
Stokes dropped as absolute awful and will be ripped AGAIN.
Burge
Pennington RB
Webster - absolute despise but two big lumps up top require his presense
Martin
Phillips LB
Odeluswi
O Brien
Fleck
Williams
Nouble
Samuel.
Stokes dropped as absolute awful and will be ripped AGAIN.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
442
...........Burge............
AP......MP....AM......RH
..........JOB....JF..........
SO........................BT
..........FN.....DS........
Keep the ball on the ground.
Do not I repeat do not let Hansen drop onto our full backs on crosses AM should follow Hansen everywhere even if he drifts out to the full back.
He has done us three times in the last few matches.
Dropping Stokes would have meant a draw or win on Saturday
Even with a bobbling pitch quick passing between the six in midfield and up front would destroy Bradford.
...........Burge............
AP......MP....AM......RH
..........JOB....JF..........
SO........................BT
..........FN.....DS........
Keep the ball on the ground.
Do not I repeat do not let Hansen drop onto our full backs on crosses AM should follow Hansen everywhere even if he drifts out to the full back.
He has done us three times in the last few matches.
Dropping Stokes would have meant a draw or win on Saturday
Even with a bobbling pitch quick passing between the six in midfield and up front would destroy Bradford.
4waspsting
Active Member
Looks he'll have to work SP's Legacy,ends up like a bad plumbing job,repair it yourself
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Williams offers no protection. To stop crosses you need wingers and full backs working together. Bradford play diagonal balls to Hansen.
If Conor Thomas is fit he should start.
rupert_bear
Well-Known Member
The problem he has is trying to gee up players who know they won't be here come the end of season, we have too many of them
-------------Burge
Phillips-Webster-Martin-Stokes
----------Pennington
-------Thomas-------Fleck
Odelusi---------------------JOB
-----------Samuel
If Thomas isn't fit move JOB inside and play Williams/Turgott. Looks pretty desperate, but I think we reached that stage a while back.
Phillips-Webster-Martin-Stokes
----------Pennington
-------Thomas-------Fleck
Odelusi---------------------JOB
-----------Samuel
If Thomas isn't fit move JOB inside and play Williams/Turgott. Looks pretty desperate, but I think we reached that stage a while back.
Played out of position ...never played wide left in his entire career competitively, enough said.
Williams offers no protection might be right but it would make them think twice if we had more flair players in the team, its the diagonals / crosses that are the worry and we need strong tackling full backs tomorrow hence I gone for Phillips left back as alot their balls come from the right, we will be slaughtered if stokes is full back tomorrow.
Thomas I agree with does the dirty work people simply do not see that is vital.
And he might need a couple more still.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
I agree, but he'll expose the centre backs playing with his roaming if he playing in a central 2. It's him or Turgott who we've not seen enough off and not trusted by TM when we were chasing the game or Williams who is similarly weak and ineffective at LM, we're left with picking the least worst option. We could play 451/451 but that hasn't worked for us either. Perhaps we should go Back to 352?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
I'd go with
-----------------Burge
Phillips--Pennington--Webster--Haynes
------------Thomas----JOB
Odelusi--------Williams--------Turgott
---------------Samuel
-----------------Burge
Phillips--Pennington--Webster--Haynes
------------Thomas----JOB
Odelusi--------Williams--------Turgott
---------------Samuel
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Ha ha it's anti stokes time - how do you ensure a win - by playing the consistently awful Haynes?
