More white potential terrorists arrested than any other group (1 Viewer)

Forums New posts
rob9872

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Yeah but includes white Muslims too :)
 
clint van damme

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
saw thread title and thought it was going to be about the mass shootings in the States.

Seems to be more frequent than usual over there at the moment.
 
Alan Dugdales Moustache

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
It's a reactive thing though isn't it ? It wouldn't be news if there had been no terror attacks on innocent people in the first place . The only thing that surprises me is that it hasn't happened earlier. It's thanks to the security services who no doubt have been able to thwart more attacks there aren't lynch mobs out on the streets.
 
chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The numbers are meaningless, you need to go off percentages and compare to the make up of the population.
White suspects accounted for 38 per cent of terror-related arrests, followed by those of Asian appearance on 37 per cent and black suspects on 9 per cent.
Click to expand...
The most recent Census in 2011 highlights that in England and Wales, 80 per cent of the population were white British. Asian (Pakistani, Indian, Bangladeshi, other) ‘groups’ made up 6.8 per cent of the population; black groups 3.4 per cent; Chinese groups 0.7 per cent; Arab groups 0.4 per cent and other groups 0.6 per cent.
Click to expand...
 
Captain Dart

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Note the phrase potential terrorist as opposed to actual terrorist who has committed violence.
 
Alan Dugdales Moustache

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Captain Dart said:
Note the phrase potential terrorist as opposed to actual terrorist who has committed violence.
Click to expand...
Indeed . If the number of attacks increases the police will be rounding up millions of "potential" terrorists.
That independent report may as well say that white people are getting pissed off at getting blown up or run over by terrorists and some of them actually want to go and stop it themselves without phoning the police first. Big deal.
 
Last edited:
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Evo1883

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
If you take a scroll through the independents social media pages, you will find countless articles where they just forever put down the nasty old white man .
It is worse than the guardian
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
chiefdave said:
The numbers are meaningless, you need to go off percentages and compare to the make up of the population.
Click to expand...

Percentages are only interesting if you want to know if white people are more likely to be terrorists (they aren’t). Which is interesting for social scientists.

Absolute numbers tell you the bigger threat to the country, which is probably more interesting to the security services.

So no point racially profiling white people, but should probably put more resource into far right British terror than far right Islamic terror.

It’s the same ideology anyway. Britain First et al and ISIS are just two sides of the same coin.
 
Evo1883

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Percentages are only interesting if you want to know if white people are more likely to be terrorists (they aren’t). Which is interesting for social scientists.

Absolute numbers tell you the bigger threat to the country, which is probably more interesting to the security services.

So no point racially profiling white people, but should probably put more resource into far right British terror than far right Islamic terror.

It’s the same ideology anyway. Britain First et al and ISIS are just two sides of the same coin.
Click to expand...
Lol that last paragraph , my word there is literally no hope
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Percentages are only interesting if you want to know if white people are more likely to be terrorists (they aren’t). Which is interesting for social scientists.

Absolute numbers tell you the bigger threat to the country, which is probably more interesting to the security services.

So no point racially profiling white people, but should probably put more resource into far right British terror than far right Islamic terror.

It’s the same ideology anyway. Britain First et al and ISIS are just two sides of the same coin.
Click to expand...

It’s truly a bizarre theory.

So Britain First - a rag tag organisation of less than 1,000 is more of a threat than an organisation that trains people in terror, has committed more deaths in one incident than any other organisation has in totality and according to our own intelligence services has 23,000 potential suspects wandering around the uk.

The comment on absolutes versus percentages is mind boggling. Percentages are obviously more relevant in stop and search as even these statistics show it’s around 4000% more likely a Muslim is carrying a bomb than a white person

Amazing really
 
dancers lance

dancers lance

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
It’s truly a bizarre theory.

So Britain First - a rag tag organisation of less than 1,000 is more of a threat than an organisation that trains people in terror, has committed more deaths in one incident than any other organisation has in totality and according to our own intelligence services has 23,000 potential suspects wandering around the uk.

The comment on absolutes versus percentages is mind boggling. Percentages are obviously more relevant in stop and search as even these statistics show it’s around 4000% more likely a Muslim is carrying a bomb than a white person

Amazing really
Click to expand...
And the 23,000 figure is an estimate (considered on the low side) of islamist terror suspects that are considered a serious threat, the true figure would be massive if they added in people who agree with the ideology.
 
dancers lance

dancers lance

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
The Independent is the young, naive, and self-hating version of Daily Mail.

It amazes me how many young and entitled people can say others are being brainwashed when this 'paper' is doing exactly the same to them.

There was an article on BBC today trying to make it sound like it was false to say Mohammed was the most popular baby name in the UK. In the end it turns out that it is, but you'd only know that if you find where they have hidden away that you have to incorporate different spellings...

Why do the press twist everything, and why are people so stupid?
 
Captain Dart

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
The Independent is the young, naive, and self-hating version of Daily Mail.

It amazes me how many young and entitled people can say others are being brainwashed when this 'paper' is doing exactly the same to them.

There was an article on BBC today trying to make it sound like it was false to say Mohammed was the most popular baby name in the UK. In the end it turns out that it is, but you'd only know that if you find where they have hidden away that you have to incorporate different spellings...

Why do the press twist everything, and why are people so stupid?
Click to expand...

On 25 March 2010, Independent News & Media was sold the newspaper to Russian oligarch Alexander Lebedev

All you need to know.
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
The Independent is the young, naive, and self-hating version of Daily Mail.

It amazes me how many young and entitled people can say others are being brainwashed when this 'paper' is doing exactly the same to them.

There was an article on BBC today trying to make it sound like it was false to say Mohammed was the most popular baby name in the UK. In the end it turns out that it is, but you'd only know that if you find where they have hidden away that you have to incorporate different spellings...

Why do the press twist everything, and why are people so stupid?[/QUOTE]
Click to expand...

people let hate and fear make them stupid. you know..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top