Search results

I’ve ended going to a few games as my youngest wants to go and watch Cov. Got to admit the better team lost and to somebody that doesn’t know that much about football it looks like your one quality striker away from being one of the best teams in the league

At least it looks like they’re talking and trying to accommodate each other. There are always going to be clashes that’s unavoidable

As fans we just have to accept that some of the supporters of our clubs can be morons.

Like it or not at the moment Wasps are in control of the Ricoh, that may or may not continue to be the case but while it is you're just going to have accept it. There you go that statement should get you worked up enough that your screen will need all the spital wiping off it.

If you look at my earlier posts I totally agree with you. in a sensible world it would be easy to arrange but in the past when has sensible come into it with Wasps and SISU

you really are in turmoil aren't you. It's really not healthy to have that much anger bottled up inside so i'm happy that i can provide you with a vessel to vent your frustrations. Glad to help and here's hoping you feel just a little bit better now.

I for one have always agreed CCFC should have a share of revenues from match days. Only a fool would argue that over a season CCFC won't get more people through the gates than Wasps and as such make the Ricoh more profitable, why shouldn't you receive a fair percentage of that money.

have you ever thought about therapy you seem a very angry person? it might help

That argument works both ways. if you want a good landlord then be a good tenant.

Charming

I get that but enforcing that rule on CCFC wouldn't get them primacy it would just mean they wouldn't be able to play at the Ricoh. Hopefully this conversation is irrelevant and it's a been sorted in advance./

The EFL cannot enforce it. you are correct they could refuse to authorise a ground share without it but in that case it would be down to CCFC to find a solution it certainly wouldn't mean that Wasps would just have to do as they were told.

Ok didn't word it very well and i'm not a clear on the timelines a you guys. Did the from a website you show screen shot of comments of two people what does that prove. The Once a Wasp forum is exactly the same as one here, some people are sensible and some are dickheads.

Genuine question, primacy was agreed for the football club as part of the terms when CCC sold to Wasps was this before the move to Northampton?

Majority of Wasps fans I know are and have always been more than happy to CCFC playing at the Ricoh

I'm not disagreeing with you, just trying to point out that the EFL cannot dictate when Wasps can and can't play in the stadium. absolutely no reason why the fixture list can't be done to accommodate both teams but as we saw last time there will be fixture clashes because both the PRL & EFL will...

Not sure what is so hard to understand about this, the EFL cannot enforce their regulations on a stadium owner and their team that plays a completely different sport for a different organisation. As for "they made an exception last time" they had no choice as the team that is part of there...

If CCFC haven't got primacy (and we don't know that they haven't) the EFL may not be happy about it but you know as well as I do they won't appose the move back. Just like most sports organisations they only try to enforce their regulations when it suits them

EFL cannot enforce their regulations on a team from outside their organisation unless both teams are under the same ownership such Bristol or the football club owns the ground. In this case what Sky wants is irrelevant as Wasps are tied into contractual agreements with BT Sports through the PRL...