Search results

Block 23 arrived 16:45

You don't have to imagine it. -.they did

Who knows. The announcement might have been pre-planned for tonight

Teaser alert

Oh the irony

Do we have to synchronize announcements with the selling club?

I doubt that Bumley would have wanted McNally to come on loan to us as they want him to develop into a rounded defender, not a Coventry defender

I thought something like that when it was first announced

I think it was. A friend of mine was told a couple months sgo that it was a possibility

Rather shows the EPL /Sky priority. Media accommodation before playing conditions

You could argue that if COH hadn't been injured Hamer would not have played such an advanced role etc............... It's all what ifs

So if it's by the players entrance, what's in that space now?

Could be there's an agreement between selling and buying clubs to coordinate their announcements

I agree with that summary but we have to accept that the players we sell may be at their peak value before we want to sell them. We just have to learn to live with that and adapt.

I'll bite We tried him out on loan and lots of us on here said he wasn't good enough Thankfully the club management had better judgement than we did.

When talking about the Brentford model bear in mind that they closed their academy while in the lower leagues as being not cost effective. I think they have reinstated it now they are re-established in the PL

We can't replace Gus on a like- for - like basis any more than we could find a clone of Vic. But other teams outperformed us with neither of them, We just have to find similar quality and accept that we might have to play to their strengths for a while

I see we hadn't got a shirt for him to wear

Pay on the gate now announced

Oh, I agree. There was a time when I thought it would be too soon if we were promoted and then I thought no, just take the money and consolidate