Search results

Well she's now seen more home games this season than about 20,000 who went to Wembley

If it is her I think it's a good sign that she's here.

We're all in denial about them...................................

Totally agree. What else do people expect. Whatever your opinion of SISU, they need to decide a policy before they make a statement, and as we have seen from previous events, SISU do not declare their hand until the last minute

Isn't part of that debt unrelated to the cost of acquisition. management or value of the stadium, but a loan to pay of Wasp's debt to their owner? In other words, Wasps have loaded a cost onto the stadium that is not inherent in it's value. So why should another party help to pay off that...

Only one

Fisher is a director of companies owned by SISU but he is not a director of SISU, Anyway, directorships do not necessarily mean power because we all know that in matters of this magnitude and significance, decisions are taken by Joy Sepalla. I'm not at all surprised by the silence as I presume...

Have I missed something, Has this come from CCFC or is it speculation?

But if Wasps acted in good faith and paid what was asked and agreed, it is solely the council's problem. Mind you, if there was a stitch up between Wasps and the council................

But that's not in Coventry and it's more than 6 miles.........surely nobody will go....after all principles are principles

Am I the only one who thinks that the grand plan is to install Cov.Utd. at the Ricoh...?

Update doesn't necessarily mean decision. It could just be announcing a date for the decision

You seem to be overlooking the fact that Peterborough are better placed to overtake Doncaster than we are, so even if your scenario pans out we could still be in P7

I agree with your sentiment. You're quite right. You will have to imagine that headline.

I think not playing anywhere because we dont exist would be a lot worse, although for some that seems to be the preferred option

For me Ricoh 20 miles Sixfields 19 Miles Burton 52 miles I'd sooner go the extra mile to the Ricoh

Sorry if I confused you. Council want the existing Harbury Lane site. That's why they are building a replacement.

We know he can cross a ball but only when he gets to the goal line. He just will not make an early cross.

Council want the land for a Travellers Camp.

True but they didn't take the money out as interest which some seem to think they do. That's part of the whole story as well