Search results

In your opinion we should never have agreed any rent deal with ACL. You said we should keep pushing and pushing till we destroy them. You agreed with SISU's tactics and was actively encouraging them. That led to us going to Northampton, so well done on that opinion. You initially said we would...

That's up to of course and there will always be some who will turn up no matter what but as long as that eventually becomes a small minority SISU will put us into administration. Crying shame but I can't see any other way sorry. Trust me it's not what I want to be saying in a million years

Two plans 1) turn up SISU keep trying to get it to run at breakeven. Gradual decline eventually administration. After 2-3 years. 2) no one turn up bar season ticket holders, next year season ticket holders don't renew. By September Administration. Both IMO will lead to new owners buying us...

Unfortunately the only option genuinely to remove SISU, is to not attend. (IMO) Season ticket holders have already paid. So if I was a season ticket holder I would attend and not purchase anything. Never thought I would encourage this, but it does seem the only way. What a crying shame. I find...

You think that is why they moved back!!!!

0-0 bore draw horrible football

Then it will again have no credibility. They probably disbanded because non of his mates were prepared to be chair or vice chair anymore. So they may have ended up with someone who asks the harder questions if the owners that the fans do actually want asking.

Don't remind me of that dire anti football. Still disgust me that he has anything to do with England's youth. That will will set us back years. We don't need to aimlessly hoof it to be resilient at the back, so I hope Slade isn't like hoothroyd.

Didn't listen in the end. Which really surprises me as I normally wouldn't miss it for anything. He either doesn't accept or understand that pushing for breakeven is pointless. As you make the cuts the quality drops and revenue will naturally drop. There has to be a point where you can no...

Up next

What does irritate me is with both the CET and Les You get a paragraph of what the article is about. Not much if any digging has been done into that paragraph. With Les it is what the club feeds him. With the CET it's what they pick up off social media. Then for both of them the remaining three...

You could look at that from two angles in terms of readership it's a mistake as the club as oppose to trying to engage with them and prove them wrong was always going to just take the easy option if a ban. The other way if looking at it was as gauntly (I know he is an arse) did. That it was...

He has come out quite strong against the actions of our owners and clashed with Les Reid and the club's previous press officer over it. Also he posted on here and put a few people right quite a few times. Which I guess probably didn't go down too well. After that period he became a bit of a...

Definitely the formation I would prefer and see if Kyle and Jodi can step up to the plate .............New GK/RCC......... DKE....Willis...Turnball..Stokes Jones ..Bigi...Stevenson...Reid .............New Striker x 2........... Sordell Haynes New CM Rose New winger New Striker Harries...

Ironically in that thread Grendel talks about dropping legal action as part of negotiations. Hilarious example of complete hypocrisy where on other threads when it suits he says dropping legal action should not be requested as part of negotiations Funny the bloke can't lie straight in bed. No...

JR2 isn't about the transparency of the process JR2 is that it is was sold too cheaply. So if the same deal was done in public and as SISU stated they would not have done that deal. If they then took out a unwinable JR like JR1. ( their choice to burn their investors money ) Prior to completion...

Good luck to him

It is just not realistic or creadible to suggest that an entire council would agree unanimously to not do a transparent open bid in such a controversial subject in order to stick two fingers at SISU. Now the fact that SISU had allegedly stated that they would tie the council up in legal battles...

They had so many opportunities to bid and didn't. They got a final warning and didn't. They had a good plan in place. I can only assume they couldn't afford the deal Wasps did hence why they said afterwards they would never had done that deal. They legal action they have taken over the Wasps...