Search results

I think you would get 150k for Stevenson at this stage with plenty of sell on clauses. I have heard there is a good sell on for Wilson. I think SISU are preparing or an exit. However I think it is over the next few years and I think it is linked to Ryton and getting a much cheaper rental deal...

1-1 draw back to ours for victory with people who should be starters but don't get in the first 11 having a good game

Simple, pick a random low figure and hope no one checks :cigar:

Sorry I am not saying they intend to. However like with every failed strategy they tried in their tenure this is another one. Their intention is for the club to pay for itself. However I am pointing that by trying to do so the finish line keep moving each time they get to it. Their strategy for...

What doesn't make sense?

Cut budgets to breakeven worse football = less crowds = more cuts and selling anyone who generates interest in fans = lower crowds. It's a vicious cycle alright. The owners creating a slow version of NOPM.

They expected 8-10k at Northampton. They said we would follow them whatever they did. I think they must have surrounded themselves (and still do) by the wrong people when they concluded that. It bothered them.

Not debating whatever the original point is. However on a seperate note. You can't believe that Wasps won't be pissed off at getting dragged into someone else's court case. It means they still have to spend time and money on it as they are an interested party. Plus as you point out a lot they...

You've just repeated it. Where is that from?

I am not doing NOPM. However I can see the rationale of those who do. There is a point where SISU will realise breakeven is not achievable. NOPM speeds up the arrival of that point. At the moment selling players is delaying it.

It's only breakeven if they sell players and as they do cuts to try to get to break even. The crowds dwindle more and the breakeven point moves away. They will get to a point where they can't bridge that gap with a player sale. So why hang onto the club taking that risk. You don't have to own...

Do you think they have been advised that this compensation will be bigger at the point it us agreed if they still own the club?

It's not really much to do with our fans. Our main concern from Thai news is can we either strike deal with them long term as they are not going. If not then let's get on with Plan B. Last thing we want to be doing is playing a waiting game that actually is going nowhere

Wasps fans must view things differently to us then, is there no uproar from them?

Think it shows the 'waiting for Wasps to break plan' is wishful thinking

Same people most the time

If I was a multimillionaire. I would have private talks with Wasps, compass and the council. Make sure I have an option on the Butts or can do a deal with the Ricoh. With them knowing unless I can strike a satisfactory deal I won't even bid. Once I have that agreement in place. I would then make...

I am not clued up on his time as a chairman. Always just assured he was viewed as a legend as both previous manager and chairman. It's good his spell as chairman hasn't ruined his stats due to his manager exploits

Wasn't there for that era myself,

You know more about Jimmy Hills tenure than me. What was Jimmy Hills other Business interest that was influencing his decisions with the club? I take it the fans didn't trust him and couldn't relate to him. Was his solution just to throw money at it without a plan like QPR?