Search results

Those in the council who made the decision when looking at Wasps are doing then looking at the way out club is run. Unfortunately if you take them on in a debate you are on a hiding to nothing.

Have made it as a lead story on sky news! Where else have people seen it? I am getting am questions about it from friends from various parts of the country.

It could happen but I would think at maybe 2k levels and it won't be in this league or possibly even division 4. Hence why we are the only club of our stature trying to do it.

We are working on it, may not have anyone to sell this season.

And how has that cycle affected the other roughly 65 odd teams above us?

Yep it's great we should keep striving for it. For some reason though just as we nearly get there, the finishing line moves a tiny bit further away. Can't think why but it kind of reminds me of the picture above But then as you say I am just a tit, I probably have it wrong when I think that...

Closer and closer to breakeven point. Makes me feel warm inside. I will be so chuffed when I can boast to my work colleagues that our club is self reliant !!!! They can stuff wins, promotions and trophies up their bums. We will be "washing our own faces"!!!! None of them will be able to claim...

What if you don't remember how Jimmy Hill used to March?

I just think they would get a normal deal. Where as our current owners just antagonise and repeatedly fail to get any deal on anything and blame everyone else. I assume fan owned clubs employ professionals to do the running of the club who have experience in such matters?

The more cuts and player sales = the poorer the results = even lower crowds. Simple fact of life it's a cycle that will only head to one place.

I am not so sure. A fans ran club approaching Wasps for a long term Ricoh deal. You think it would be 1.2 million a year for 250 years?

The trust answers their questions.

Under the trust yes it would be restricted by finances. The same as it currently under SISU. However it would be better because they could do deals with key partners yes. The only way we will progress is if we have an owner who is prepared to lose money.

I am not doing NOMP. Yet I have given you an explanation of how and why it would work.

The trust would be the same as SISU trying to break even. However they would have a clean slate with potential key partners. Also their decision making would be so key driven by CCFC not an overriding seperate business.

I am no financial whiz but OSB looked at it and said admin is the most likely route if there is no buyer as oppose to liquidation. So I go by that.

And Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea quite amazing really.

If you were to decide to leave the club because you decide you can't get it to break even point. If you can't find a buyer you would place it into admin.

Not doing NOPM myself but I think there is a logic to it. It depends if you believe the owners are going to Build a new stadium Build a new training/academy facility Sign long term rent deals Or Try to get the club to fund itself by cutting as many costs as possible. Try to keep renewing...

Not arguing with you. However unless the FA/FL FIFA UEFA ect do something about it. Then unless you are an Arsenal self sustainability when in Division 3 or 4 means that is where you will stay (if you are lucky) Unfortunately the reality is any football club with ambition for promotion must...