Search results

It’s starting to sound like you’re on a journey down a rabbit hole. Why are you bringing COVID into it? What next? Flat earth? Chem trails? WEF? 15 minute cities?

W WTF are you going on about. Plenty of people from all political view points are worried about immigration. Only the far right use it as an excuse to go out rioting shitting on their own doorstep.

Eh? Where have I said they were supposed too? Hold on. Do you think the far right are the silent majority? I’m talking about the peaceful anti racist protesters, they’re representing the silent majority.

Aren’t the far right getting tetchy after the silent majority outnumbered them in peaceful protests last night. Snowflakes.

Presumably they’re going circumnavigate the minefields Russia has installed across the front line in Ukraine by invading Russia, turning right, re-enter occupied Ukraine and attack the Russian lines from behind in a classic pincer movement. They’ve had little joy attacking across the minefields...

I think the latter at least is indisputable. I said yesterday that some people are just attracted to violence and will always latch onto a cause to excuse their behaviour. Maybe he’s just one of those.

Can’t see it. I thought I’d read that he was a known member of the EDL, maybe I got that wrong.

I think that’s a different argument. I was responding specifically to the comment of what next, ban anyone who’s been to prison. To get a football banning order you don’t even have to have been convicted let alone have had a custodial sentence, the police can request a banning order based upon...

I think it was reported having come up in court.

Plenty of people are on banning orders without having been to prison. I’m not sure why people feel the need to connect the two things. Any club should have the right to refuse his business based on his history. I’d even have a duty of care to other fans. I’m not suggesting indefinite bans...

It doesn’t matter. He is on the front of papers, a club will know who is so have the evidence to ban him if that’s what they wish to do.

This time. His history I believe is littered with violence and racism. At 58 I think you have admit he’s beyond rehabilitation.

There should be a ban for a period of time. Most of the people involved will deserve a second chance, some won’t though. I’m particularly thinking about the 58 year old with a history of this behaviour sentenced yesterday, his mindset is clearly set in still carrying on like this at his age...

I was reading that the right to strike isn’t enshrined in UK law.

Looks like it’s a night for counter protesters. The real silent majority have found their voice.

It was about 60 IIRC. Almost took Russia in a Saturday morning. 4 years later Putin still embarrassing himself on a daily basis failing to take a country nobody expected to last 4 days. The Ukrainians are tough and determined but really the two things are a measure of how awful Putin is at war...

I mean saying it’s because this crime, that crime or another crime was committed isn’t a reason to distract the police from dealing with those crimes by rioting. It’s an excuse, there’s no logic applied in coming to a conclusion that stretching an already overstretched police by rioting is...

Clearly too difficult a question to answer. The answer is of course no. Ask Laurence Fox.

You mean excuses. Reason insinuates that there’s some logic to shitting on your own doorstep. There isn’t.

Do you believe freedom of speech means freedom from consequences? Yes or no?