Search results

Yes. Let’s fill the team with players too scared to try anything more than a five yard pass in front of the opposition. Thats working great 🙄

Everyone’s saying the same thing. It’s just a difference between Goblin attacking lineup which has the fullback wider and the “wide forward” in basically the 10 position along with one of the “8”s and the basic 433 which is how they nominally line up. In defence it’s 442 with Allen either at RW...

Stick Dasilva and Sakamoto high and wide and MvE on the edge of the box for me, none of them are any use in the box.

Why do I get the feeling all the people who were very concerned about freebies to politicians suddenly will have a problem with this? https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/dec/02/government-may-cap-uk-political-donations-to-limit-foreign-influence

Would have had Johansson but I’m not sure some would after he dropped the ball on Ellis’ head against us.

Not a great draw but another game for Lampard to get his ideas across against a club in our league with no pressure. I wonder if we’ll play a full strength side this year.

Our goalkeepers paint all our goalkeepers in a pretty negative light.

Ask them to turn it off. We all need to start doing it and enforcing social norms again. Be the Karen you wish to see.

You really have become a sulky toddler since the election.

All the teams get beat.

The Tories didn’t do the same. The Tories did much worse and now there’s a desperate attempt to make normal things like donations and expenses as dodgy as the shite we saw for 14 years. And some absolute rubes are falling for it hook line and sinker.

I just think stuff is either allowed or it’s not. This coming after politicians for doing things they’re allowed to cos “optics” is silly.

But that would only help if they die a couple of weeks before the cutoff, the rules around passing on property like this haven’t changed. Maybe they didn’t want to pass it on before the tax, but all they’ve gained is doing that slightly early if anything.

Isn’t it? Should MPs not take up expenses if they’ve made an unpopular decision? What’s the rule you’re proposing here.

What advantage have they gained?

I mean the point is she’s done nothing wrong. This rule has been in place forever. You’re just being reminded of it to make you angry. I don’t think anyone would start from here, but I do think you’d have to raise the salary if you’re asking people to live in London 39 weeks of the year or...

I just don’t buy that. The old pool was still available. What’s helping him trawl that pool is what’s changed.

“over his contract”

But he hasn’t had fewer options. He’s had a squad of about twenty the whole time. He’s not bought players that we dont need, the squad if anything is a little short. We’ve overpaid on a couple but are told that’s Doug’s domain. The problem is that as a whole they’ve not been up to scratch. Is...

Go on. Who cost more than say £500k and was a failure other than Walker?