Search results

Maybe, but the fact that he can cover LW, RW, second striker, or even AM, probably suggests that he will be on the bench at least. (Once up to speed)

I think overall he's a good player, yes he can give the ball away too often, but his ability to create chances can't be ignored. He has good control in tight situations, and is a bit of a maverick. Unfortunately his form can be inconsistent and he should get on the score sheet more often. But...

Your Prince Andrew. I fuckin knew it!

FFS, we're not arguing over Blackburn Rovers season, the point is Fadz is 8 years older than Browne, so Browne's age isn't a barrier if we offer a 3 year deal.

That's because they are a poor team hence they were in a relegation scrap, Fadz was brought I to help keep them up, and they/he achieved that. As you pointed out, the fact that he made 12 starts at the back end of the season, proves my point exactly. He's still performing even though he's...

Who said he was?

Looked good against us at their gaff. He even supplied the pass that resulted in Kitching having to drag their striker down and getting a red card in the process. I've no.doubt we'd of picked up more than 1 point out of a possible 18 if we'd of still had Fadz at the back end of the season.

The bigger risk would be allowing him to go to a competitor. Is he better than what we have? I'd say yes (with the possible exception of Sheaf) As things stand, if Sheaf gets injured we are screwed, add to that the fact that both Sheaf and Browne can play In the same team, and all of a...

Exactly, Fadz is 8 years older than Browne and still performing at Championship level. I'd be more than happy for us to sign Browne on a 3 year deal.

That makes no sense. If you pay him £15k a week over 3 years that's less than £2.5million for a player with a proven pedigree at championship level and a natural leader on the pitch. Alternatively you could pay 4 or 5 million in transfer fees, plus 1 or 2 million in wages, for a younger up...

Love take off a day landings, but the bit in-between is boring as hell.

Smarty pants!

Slow news day G?

He should of been given a season ticket and forced to watch that shit every week!

I'd be very disappointed if we were to be outbid by Preston. If he chose to stay for non financial reasons, ie, his family is settled, and he felt he has loyalty to Preston having been there for 10 years etc etc, then fair enough.

Exactly, Usyk had 5 minutes to recover from a shot that was on the belt, of shorts that were nearly covering his tits. No problem with the result last night, I had Usyk ahead by 1 round, and it's set up nicely for the rematch. No idea what John Fury was doing on the corner, may as well...

That's not how things work financially. We're paying Sims £25k a week AND we paid a significant fee to Everton for him. So the cost spread over a 4 year deal equates to around £45k a week. Wright's deal is around £55k weeks. (Roughly) O'hare is available on a free, so if we paid him £25k a...

Boxing was the winner tonight along with Saudi Arabia, both boxers put everything on the line and gave 100% and I'm just glad it didn't end in controversy. The re-match will no doubt be another multi million pound affair and every one connected with the event will be quids in. Let's hope...

I agree, Tyson was comfortably ahead and started show boating, but round 8 was the turning point. Round 9 was Usyk's (just) and after that it was evens. I thought it would be given as a draw, but I really can't argue with Usyk winning by 1 round. Usyk is an amazing fighter, and Fury...

Let's hope they get it on again, Usyk's fitness was the difference for me, Usyk never slowed down, Fury visibly tired from the 8th round. Usyk got a 10-8 round and won by 1 point. That was the difference. But what a great fight.