Search results

The reasons that were inferred earlier and now have later been pointed out are chicken sh1t. No wonder I missed them. Calling people thick because they don't agree with your opinion is in itself crass. ADVICE : If you stop commenting the threads would be a lot shorter.

They came through after you made the quote there were loads of people. You are arguing about nothing. Whats your agenda? It seems more about stopping any negative effect on Sisu to me as I can't see how it 'really' effects CCFC in any manner. The turn out at Wembley shows that the team gets...

They came after I asked the question and I missed them in the crossfire. I don't read tweets so I'm looking at the news outlets only on here. I think NOPM is a falicy. It's just an excuse not to go. It's obsolete while the team is doing well. Similar sort of argument where NOPM have no facts on...

Okay, What has been explained.?

Nope read through again, just in case. The reports are not factually wrong and people are right in saying that one interpretation they could take is that Sisu are making money from CCFC. But I can't see where anybody reflects on it being more negative for CCFC than Sisu. Unless....... I see...

It's easy. There are no posts in this thread that give the reason why CCFC will be negatively effected by the reports on Sisu profits more than Sisu.

You know my stance on this'd although it's nothing to do with this thread I'll indulge you. I will never again put anything positive forward for Sisu but I will allow them to drop into the background while the club is going in the right direction. As for Wasps being a threat to CCFC I don't see...

No, your just wrong.

Am I not getting all the posts ? No one has explained why CCFC will get any negativity and from where. They have explained that the media has posted Sisu profits, told us they are CCFC owners and more than likely made some people think that they are taking money out the club, but that's it.

No it won't. More like sympathy. No one has explained why it will hurt CCFC more than Sisu although for some reason you think they have. To most it just shows that the owners of CCFC have made a profit.

It's putting Sisu in a bad light. What's not to like ??

I'm explaining the reasoning behind the report and how it WILL give an impression for some but I'm also pointing out that it is factually correct. Detracts from what Sisu have done, means ?

It definitely puts Sisu in a bad light as it could give the impression they are taking money out the club. Don't see how it puts CCFC in a bad light though. You could say that despite the owners the club is advancing. In fact I will say that.

Impression ? Is that impression right or wrong because the statements are correct and its solely the video that will influence people? Answer, unlikely but we don't really know without the facts. Another Answer, we all hate Sisu though so lets take this opportunity to put them in a bad light.

Dave has cleared it up ? LOL

Am I missing the point. This TV report says the owners of CCFC have made a profit whilst showing a film of CCFC. Then SG says the same and shows the accounts. At what point does it say that Sisu made a profit from CCFC?

I think we agree. But whats the problem in putting Sisu in a bad light at every opportunity ??? ;)

He hasn't though has he. He has said there is no evidence either way .... yet. The 'lazy journalism' as suggested is that they are inferring that Sisu profits are directly from CCFC when we don't really know. In reality there are no real facts yet so it allows people to slant it how they want...

Do Sisu accounts include any incomes/losses from CCFC business? They should do, but the detail is not there so depending on your view of Sisu depends which way you bias reporting them. I'm saying most fans want Sisu gone and will interpret them as negative, particularly as they show a big...

... and I replied to your comment that "they are not using the facts" with the question "where are the facts".