Search results

I think that's a ridiculous amount and no-one is going to pay that. Maybe as he develops he'll become some world-class player, but I'm just not seeing it. What I'm seeing is hype. But assuming he stays he will probably do well in the Championship.

Loan for tomorrow...?

Did you mean negligent? ;)

Have they had to make a change then? Tonks on the bench according to the teamsheet. Also noticed they have Kyle Finn playing for them. Seem to remember he and Ponticelli both scoring loads when playing together for the academy.

So could have gone either way then?

Apparently can't make it because it's past his girlfriend's bedtime.

Grimes is far more composed on the ball IMO. Sheaf will at some point play us into trouble with a misplaced pass so deeper he plays more likely it will leave the defence exposed.

Two players that haven't impressed me at all this season. Ramsdale has been at fault for a number of goals and Dibling looks like one of those players that flatters to deceive - looks exciting because he tries to run with the ball but generally does nothing with it.

One thing that I wish would come from this is how stupid it is to place so much emphasis on things like stock markets.

For the two weeks they apply it before quietly forgetting about it. It's been suggested refs aren't upholding the current law because they think it's too harsh, why would two seconds extra makes all the difference? I'm not saying it won't work if applied, but then the same is true of the...

Urban Dictionary

To be fair neither would most people. They'd need it to stop.

Won't make the slightest bit of difference adding 2 seconds onto the existing rule. Most hold it for longer than 8 seconds anyway.

Did he misunderstand was seagulling was?

I think he's distantly related to the Duke of Westminster.

Well with a team of him he was almost certainly underrated, overrated, correctly rated, incorrectly rated, loved and hated.

Great keeper. Saves everything and great on crosses.

I agree that if her aims are for growth then that top sentence makes far more sense than what she is doing. However, despite all the evidence that what she is doing will stunt growth it seems that balancing the books short term takes priority. Even though growth can do that eventually it's seen...

Most of what she's been doing is a continuation of Tory policy from the last 14 years. If the Tories were in power and making cuts I doubt you'd be calling them clueless for it (even though I agree that it is. ) Everyone knew growth would be poor because making cuts always restricts growth...